Suppr超能文献

评估神经外科受训者对扩展现实的使用及其对神经外科学教育影响的看法和态度:一项调查。

Assessing views and attitudes toward the use of extended reality and its implications in neurosurgical education: a survey of neurosurgical trainees.

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, North Carolina.

2Department of Neuroscience, Chicago Medical School of Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2024 Jan;56(1):E18. doi: 10.3171/2023.10.FOCUS23647.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Extended reality (XR) systems, including augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality, have rapidly emerged as new technologies capable of changing the way neurosurgeons prepare for cases. Thus, the authors sought to evaluate the perspectives of neurosurgical trainees on the integration of these technologies into neurosurgical education.

METHODS

A 20-question cross-sectional survey was administered to neurosurgical residents and fellows to evaluate perceptions of the use of XR in neurosurgical training. Respondents evaluated each statement using a modified Likert scale (1-5).

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen responses were recorded, with 59.5% of participants completing more than 90% of the questions. Approximately 59% of participants reported having institutional access to XR technologies. The majority of XR users (72%) believed it was effective for simulating surgical situations, compared with only 41% for those who did not have access to XR. Most respondents (61%) agreed that XR could become a standard in neurosurgical education and a cost-effective training tool (60%). Creating patient-specific anatomical XR models was considered relatively easy by 56% of respondents. Those with XR access reported finding it easier to create intraoperative models (58%) than those without access. A significant percentage (79%) agreed on the need for technical skill training outside the operating room (OR), especially among those without XR access (82%). There was general agreement (60%) regarding the specific need for XR. XR was perceived as effectively simulating stress in the OR. Regarding clinical outcomes, 61% believed XR improved efficiency and safety and 48% agreed it enhanced resection margins. Major barriers to XR integration included lack of ample training hours and/or time to use XR amid daily clinical obligations (63%).

CONCLUSIONS

The data presented in this study indicate that there is broad agreement among neurosurgical trainees that XR holds potential as a training modality in neurosurgical education. Moreover, trainees who have access to XR technologies tend to hold more positive perceptions regarding the benefits of XR in their training. This finding suggests that the availability of XR resources can positively influence trainees' attitudes and beliefs regarding the utility of these technologies in their education and training.

摘要

目的

扩展现实(XR)系统,包括增强现实(AR)、虚拟现实(VR)和混合现实,已迅速成为能够改变神经外科医生准备手术方式的新技术。因此,作者试图评估神经外科受训者对将这些技术融入神经外科教育的看法。

方法

向神经外科住院医师和研究员发放了 20 个问题的横断面调查,以评估他们对 XR 在神经外科培训中的应用的看法。回答者使用改良的李克特量表(1-5)对每个陈述进行评估。

结果

共记录了 116 份回复,其中 59.5%的参与者完成了超过 90%的问题。大约 59%的参与者报告其所在机构可获得 XR 技术。大多数 XR 用户(72%)认为它对模拟手术情况有效,而没有 XR 访问权限的用户仅为 41%。大多数受访者(61%)同意 XR 可以成为神经外科教育的标准和具有成本效益的培训工具(60%)。56%的受访者认为创建患者特定的解剖 XR 模型相对容易。有 XR 访问权限的受访者报告说,与没有访问权限的受访者相比,他们更容易创建术中模型(58%)。有相当大比例的受访者(79%)同意需要在手术室(OR)之外进行技术技能培训,尤其是那些没有 XR 访问权限的受访者(82%)。大多数受访者(60%)普遍认为需要特定的 XR。XR 被认为能够有效地模拟 OR 中的压力。关于临床结果,61%的人认为 XR 提高了效率和安全性,48%的人认为它增强了切除边缘。XR 整合的主要障碍包括缺乏充足的培训时间和/或在日常临床任务中使用 XR 的时间(63%)。

结论

本研究中的数据表明,神经外科受训者普遍认为 XR 作为神经外科教育的一种培训模式具有潜力。此外,有 XR 技术访问权限的受训者对 XR 在其培训中的益处持更积极的看法。这一发现表明,XR 资源的可用性可以积极影响受训者对这些技术在其教育和培训中的效用的态度和信念。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验