CTA and CTP for Detecting Distal Medium Vessel Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

The optimal imaging method for detecting distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) remains undefined.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of CTA with CTP in detecting DMVOs.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to March 31, 2023 (PROSPERO: CRD42022344006).

STUDY SELECTION

A total of 12 studies reporting accuracy values of CTA and/or CTP were included, comprising 2607 patients with 479 cases (18.3%) of DMVOs.

DATA ANALYSIS

Pooled sensitivity and specificity of both imaging methods were compared using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the technique used in CTA (multi or single-phase) and the subtype of DMVOs (M2-only vs. M2 and other DMVOs). We applied Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) quality assessment criteria.

DATA SYNTHESIS

CTA demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity compared to CTP in detecting DMVOs [0.74, 95%CI (0.63-0.82) vs. 0.89, 95% CI (0.82-0.93), < 0.01]. When subgrouped into single-phase and multi-phase CTA, multi-phase CTA exhibited higher sensitivity for DMVO detection than single-phase CTA [0.91, 95%CI (0.85-0.94) vs. 0.64, 95%CI (0.56-0.71), < .01], while reaching similar levels to CTP. The sensitivity of single-phase CTA substantially decreased when extending from M2 to other non-M2 DMVOs [0.74, 95%CI (0.63-0.83) vs. 0.61, 0.95%CI (0.53-0.68), = .02].

LIMITATIONS

We identified an overall high risk of bias and low quality of evidence, attributable to the design and reference standards of most studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight a significantly lower sensitivity of single-phase CTA compared to multi-phase CTA and CTP in diagnosing DMVOs.