Suppr超能文献

CT 血管造影和 CT 灌注成像诊断远端中等血管闭塞的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。

Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography and CT perfusion imaging for detecting distal medium vessel occlusions: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Neurology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 10;18(4):e0284116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284116. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) represent 25-40% of all acute ischemic strokes (AIS). DMVO clinical syndromes are heterogenous, but as eloquent brain regions are frequently involved, they are often disabling. Since current intravenous fibrinolytic therapies may fail to recanalize up to two-thirds of DMVOs, endovascular treatment is progressively being considered in this setting. Nevertheless, the optimal imaging method for diagnosis remains to be defined. Stroke centers that use computed tomography as a routine stroke imaging approach rely on either isolated computed tomography angiography (CTA) or combined perfusion (CTP) studies. Despite a simplified non-CTP-dependent approach seeming reasonable for large vessel occlusion AIS diagnosis, CTP may still hold advantages for DMVOs workup. Therefore, this systematic review aims to compare the diagnostic performance of CTA and CTP in detecting DMVOs.

METHODS

We will perform a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. In addition, grey literature and ClinicalTrials.gov will be scanned. We will include any type of study that presents data on the diagnostic accuracy of CTA and/or CTP for detecting DMVOs. Two authors will independently review retrieved studies, and any discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or with a third reviewer. Reviewers will extract the data and assess the risk of bias in the selected studies. Data will be combined in a quantitative meta-analysis following the guidelines provided by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We will assess cumulative evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

DISCUSSION

This will be the first systematic review and meta-analysis that compares two different imaging approaches for detecting DMVOs. This study may help to define optimal acute ischemic stroke imaging work-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration: CRD42022344006.

摘要

背景

远端中等血管闭塞(DMVO)占所有急性缺血性中风(AIS)的 25-40%。DMVO 的临床综合征具有异质性,但由于经常涉及到有表达能力的大脑区域,因此它们通常会导致残疾。由于目前的静脉内溶栓治疗可能无法使三分之二的 DMVO 再通,因此在这种情况下,血管内治疗正在逐渐被考虑。然而,用于诊断的最佳成像方法仍有待确定。使用计算机断层扫描作为常规中风成像方法的中风中心依赖于单独的计算机断层血管造影(CTA)或联合灌注(CTP)研究。尽管简化的非 CTP 依赖性方法对于大血管闭塞性 AIS 的诊断似乎是合理的,但 CTP 对于 DMVO 的评估可能仍具有优势。因此,本系统评价旨在比较 CTA 和 CTP 在检测 DMVO 方面的诊断性能。

方法

我们将在 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 核心合集和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中进行系统搜索。此外,还将扫描灰色文献和 ClinicalTrials.gov。我们将纳入任何类型的研究,这些研究提供了 CTA 和/或 CTP 检测 DMVO 的诊断准确性数据。两位作者将独立审查检索到的研究,任何分歧将通过共识或第三位审稿人解决。审稿人将提取数据并评估所选研究的偏倚风险。将按照《干预措施系统评价 Cochrane 手册》提供的指南对数据进行定量荟萃分析。我们将使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法评估累积证据。

讨论

这将是首次比较两种不同成像方法检测 DMVO 的系统评价和荟萃分析。这项研究可能有助于确定最佳的急性缺血性中风成像评估。

试验注册

PROSPERO 注册:CRD42022344006。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6fb/10085008/5c68ab27cfdd/pone.0284116.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验