Rolin O, Bouanchaud D H
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1986;12(11):885-7.
The in vivo efficacy of habekacin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic obtained by chemical derivation from dibekacin, was compared to that of gentamicin (GEN), tobramycin (TOB), kanamycin (KAN) and amikacin (AMI) in a protection test in mice. The 50% effective dose (ED50) was determined in groups of animals challenged with bacterial suspensions injected intraperitoneally together with mucin, and treated subcutaneously 1 h and 6 h later. The bacterial strains used were: Escherichia coli (three GEN sensitive strains and one GEN-KAN-TOB resistant strain), Enterobacter cloacae (one GEN-KAN resistant strain), Serratia marcescens and Klebsiella pneumoniae (one GEN sensitive strain and one GEN resistant strain). In this model, habekacin was found to be as active as GEN against GEN sensitive strains and more active than AMI on GEN, GEN-KAN and GEN-KAN-TOB resistant strains.
在小鼠保护试验中,将通过地贝卡星化学衍生得到的氨基糖苷类抗生素哈贝卡星的体内疗效与庆大霉素(GEN)、妥布霉素(TOB)、卡那霉素(KAN)和阿米卡星(AMI)进行了比较。在腹腔注射细菌悬液与粘蛋白一起攻击并在1小时和6小时后皮下治疗的动物组中测定50%有效剂量(ED50)。所使用的细菌菌株为:大肠杆菌(3株GEN敏感菌株和1株GEN-KAN-TOB耐药菌株)、阴沟肠杆菌(1株GEN-KAN耐药菌株)、粘质沙雷氏菌和肺炎克雷伯菌(1株GEN敏感菌株和1株GEN耐药菌株)。在该模型中,发现哈贝卡星对GEN敏感菌株的活性与GEN相当,对GEN、GEN-KAN和GEN-KAN-TOB耐药菌株的活性比AMI更强。