Lakomkin Nikita, Eastlack Robert K, Uribe Juan S, Park Paul, Ryu Stephen I, Kretzer Ryan, Mimran Ronnie I, Holman Paul, Veeravagu Anand, Hassanzadeh Hamid, Johnson Michele M, Sullivan Linda, Clark Aaron, Mundis Gregory M
Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):1099-1105. doi: 10.1177/21925682231224394. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
Cadaveric study.
The purpose of this study was to compare a novel, integrated 3D navigational system (NAV) and conventional fluoroscopy in the accuracy, efficiency, and radiation exposure of thoracolumbar percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement.
Twelve skeletally mature cadaveric specimens were obtained for twelve individual surgeons. Each participant placed bilateral PS at 11 segments, from T8 to S1. Prior to insertion, surgeons were randomized to the sequence of techniques and the side (left or right). Following placement, a CT scan of the spine was obtained for each cadaver, and an independent reviewer assessed the accuracy of screw placement using the Gertzbein grading system. Outcome metrics of interest included a comparison of breach incidence/severity, screw placement time, total procedure time, and radiation exposure between the techniques. Bivariate statistics were employed to compare outcomes at each level.
A total of 262 screws (131 using each technique) were placed. The incidence of cortical breaches was significantly lower with NAV compared to FG (9% vs 18%; = .048). Of breaches with NAV, 25% were graded as moderate or severe compared to 39% in the FG subgroup ( = .034). Median time for screw placement was significantly lower with NAV (2.7 vs 4.1 min/screw; = .012), exclusive of registration time. Cumulative radiation exposure to the surgeon was significantly lower for NAV-guided placement (9.4 vs 134 μGy, = .02).
The use of NAV significantly decreased the incidence of cortical breaches, the severity of screw breeches, screw placement time, and radiation exposure to the surgeon when compared to traditional FG.
尸体研究。
本研究旨在比较一种新型的集成三维导航系统(NAV)与传统透视在胸腰椎经皮椎弓根螺钉(PPS)置入的准确性、效率和辐射暴露方面的差异。
为12位外科医生获取了12个骨骼成熟的尸体标本。每位参与者在从T8至S1的11个节段置入双侧椎弓根螺钉。在置入前,外科医生被随机分配技术顺序和置入侧(左侧或右侧)。置入后,对每个尸体进行脊柱CT扫描,由一名独立的评估者使用Gertzbein分级系统评估螺钉置入的准确性。感兴趣的结果指标包括两种技术之间在突破发生率/严重程度、螺钉置入时间、总手术时间和辐射暴露方面的比较。采用双变量统计比较各节段的结果。
共置入262枚螺钉(每种技术各131枚)。与传统透视(FG)相比,NAV组皮质骨突破的发生率显著更低(9%对18%;P = 0.048)。在NAV组的突破中,25%被评为中度或重度,而FG亚组为39%(P = 0.034)。排除注册时间后,NAV组螺钉置入的中位时间显著更低(2.7对4.1分钟/枚螺钉;P = 0.012)。NAV引导置入时外科医生的累积辐射暴露显著更低(9.4对134微戈瑞,P = 0.02)。
与传统的FG相比,使用NAV显著降低了皮质骨突破的发生率、螺钉突破的严重程度、螺钉置入时间以及外科医生的辐射暴露。