Suppr超能文献

网络媒体来源的政治倾向与新冠疫苗心肌炎报道。

Political orientation of online media sources and reporting of Covid-19 vaccine myocarditis.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH, United States of America.

Internal Medicine Residency Program, Geisinger Health System, Wilkes-Barre, PA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0296295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296295. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Political orientation may play a formative role in perceptions of risk associated with COVID-19 vaccination including vaccine myocarditis (CVM). Whether political alignment of news sources plays a role in perception of this risk is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the relationship between political orientation of online media sites and aspects of reporting of CVM.

METHODS

Media sites were classified as "left" or "right" biased using the Allsides media bias rating report. For each site "COVID vaccine myocarditis" was searched in articles posted May 2021 to December 2022. Each search return was reviewed for the following: 1) Did it contain numerical data regarding CVM risk? 2) Did it report benefits of covid vaccination? 3) Did it mention covid infection-related myocarditis? Monthly reports of vaccine-related adverse events were obtained from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).

RESULTS

A total of 487 online reports regarding CVM were reviewed. Comparison of monthly report volumes from left vs. right biased media sources demonstrated significant correlation (r = 0.546, p = 0.013). Additionally monthly reporting of CVM was temporally related to monthly volume of VAERS reporting (r = 0.519, p = 0.023). These data suggest that monthly reporting volumes were driven by availability of information regarding CVM rather than media political alignment. Left biased media sources were significantly more likely to include numerical CVM data vs. right biased sources (76.6% vs. 24.3%, p<0.001) and likewise were more likely to include data supporting benefits of covid vaccination (85.1% vs. 21.7%. p<0.001). In contrast, there was no difference regarding mention of COVID-19 infection-related myocarditis (24.5% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.957).

CONCLUSION

Political orientation of online news sites was not associated with frequency of CVM reports but was related to report content, most notably whether reports included numerical data regarding CVM risk. These differential reporting characteristics may contribute to the relationship between political orientation and patient conceptualization of risk of CVM.

摘要

背景

政治倾向可能在与 COVID-19 疫苗接种相关的风险认知中发挥作用,包括疫苗性心肌炎 (CVM)。新闻来源的政治立场是否会影响对这种风险的认知尚不清楚。

目的

我们研究了在线媒体网站的政治倾向与 CVM 报道方面之间的关系。

方法

使用 Allsides 媒体偏见评级报告将媒体网站归类为“左”或“右”有偏见。对于每个网站,在 2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 12 月发布的文章中搜索“COVID 疫苗性心肌炎”。对每次搜索结果进行以下审查:1)是否包含有关 CVM 风险的数值数据?2)是否报告了 COVID 疫苗接种的益处?3)是否提到了 COVID 感染相关的心肌炎?从疫苗不良事件报告系统 (VAERS) 获取与疫苗相关的不良事件月度报告。

结果

共审查了 487 份关于 CVM 的在线报告。比较来自左倾与右倾媒体来源的每月报告量显示出显著相关性(r = 0.546,p = 0.013)。此外,CVM 的每月报告与 VAERS 报告的每月量之间存在时间相关性(r = 0.519,p = 0.023)。这些数据表明,每月报告量是由 CVM 的信息可用性驱动的,而不是媒体的政治立场。左倾媒体来源更有可能包含 CVM 的数值数据,而右倾媒体来源则不太可能(76.6%对 24.3%,p<0.001),并且更有可能包含支持 COVID 疫苗接种益处的数据(85.1%对 21.7%,p<0.001)。相比之下,提及 COVID-19 感染相关心肌炎的情况没有差异(24.5%对 24.3%,p = 0.957)。

结论

在线新闻网站的政治倾向与 CVM 报告的频率无关,但与报告内容有关,尤其是报告是否包含有关 CVM 风险的数值数据。这些不同的报告特征可能会影响政治倾向与患者对 CVM 风险认知之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca5/10760870/233df8ba5b65/pone.0296295.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验