• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国成年人中新冠疫苗接种后风险沟通形式与不良事件感知风险之间的关联

Association between Risk Communication Format and Perceived Risk of Adverse Events after COVID-19 Vaccination among US Adults.

作者信息

Rosen Joshua E, Chang Sylvia Seo Eun, Williams Spencer, Lee Joy S, Han DaHee, Agrawal Nidhi, Joo Joseph H, Hsieh Gary, Reinecke Katharina, Liao Joshua M

机构信息

Surgical Outcomes Research Center, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 29;11(3):380. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030380.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11030380
PMID:36766956
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9914684/
Abstract

The format used to communicate probability-verbal versus numerical descriptors-can impact risk perceptions and behaviors. This issue is salient for the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), where concerns about vaccine-related risks may reduce uptake and verbal descriptors have been widely used by public health, news organizations and on social media, to convey risk. Because the effect of risk-communication format on perceived COVID-19 vaccine-related risks remains unknown, we conducted an online randomized survey among 939 US adults. Participants were given risk information, using verbal or numerical descriptors and were asked to report their perceived risk of experiencing headache, fever, fatigue or myocarditis from COVID-19 vaccine. Associations between risk communication format and perceived risk were assessed using multivariable regression. Compared to numerical estimates, verbal descriptors were associated with higher perceived risk of headache (β = 5.0 percentage points, 95% CI = 2.0-8.1), fever (β = 27 percentage points, 95% CI = 23-30), fatigue (β = 4.9 percentage points, 95% = CI 1.8-8.0) and myocarditis (β = 4.6 percentage points, 95% CI = 2.1-7.2), as well as greater variability in risk perceptions. Social media influence was associated with differences in risk perceptions for myocarditis, but not side effects. Verbal descriptors may lead to greater, more inaccurate and variable vaccine-related risk perceptions compared to numerical descriptors.

摘要

用于传达概率的形式——文字描述与数字描述——会影响风险认知和行为。这个问题在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)中很突出,在这种情况下,对疫苗相关风险的担忧可能会降低疫苗接种率,而文字描述已被公共卫生部门、新闻机构和社交媒体广泛用于传达风险。由于风险沟通形式对感知到的COVID-19疫苗相关风险的影响尚不清楚,我们对939名美国成年人进行了一项在线随机调查。参与者被给予使用文字或数字描述的风险信息,并被要求报告他们认为因接种COVID-19疫苗而出现头痛、发烧、疲劳或心肌炎的风险。使用多变量回归评估风险沟通形式与感知风险之间的关联。与数字估计相比,文字描述与更高的头痛感知风险(β = 5.0个百分点,95%可信区间 = 2.0 - 8.1)、发烧(β = 27个百分点,95%可信区间 = 23 - 30)、疲劳(β = 4.9个百分点,95% = 可信区间1.8 - 8.0)和心肌炎(β = 4.6个百分点,95%可信区间 = 2.1 - 7.2)相关,以及风险认知的更大变异性。社交媒体影响与心肌炎的风险认知差异相关,但与副作用无关。与数字描述相比,文字描述可能导致更大、更不准确且更具变异性的疫苗相关风险认知。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff9/9914684/69749448c627/healthcare-11-00380-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff9/9914684/a02c773da8a4/healthcare-11-00380-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff9/9914684/69749448c627/healthcare-11-00380-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff9/9914684/a02c773da8a4/healthcare-11-00380-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff9/9914684/69749448c627/healthcare-11-00380-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between Risk Communication Format and Perceived Risk of Adverse Events after COVID-19 Vaccination among US Adults.美国成年人中新冠疫苗接种后风险沟通形式与不良事件感知风险之间的关联
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 29;11(3):380. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030380.
2
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
3
Verbal Descriptions of the Probability of Treatment Complications Lead to High Variability in Risk Perceptions: A Survey Study.口头描述治疗并发症的概率会导致风险感知的高度变化:一项调查研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Apr 1;277(4):e766-e771. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005255. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
4
Direct and Indirect Associations of Media Use With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Korea: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey.直接和间接关联的媒体使用与 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫在韩国:横断面网络调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 6;24(1):e32329. doi: 10.2196/32329.
5
Communicating tailored risk information of cancer treatment side effects: Only words or also numbers?传达癌症治疗副作用的个体化风险信息:只有文字还是也有数字?
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 27;20(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01296-7.
6
Factors Associated With US Adults' Likelihood of Accepting COVID-19 Vaccination.与美国成年人接受 COVID-19 疫苗意愿相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2025594. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25594.
7
Multilevel Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among South Asian Ethnic Minorities in Hong Kong: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey.香港南亚少数族裔对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的多层次决定因素:基于网络的横断面调查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 9;7(11):e31707. doi: 10.2196/31707.
8
Side Effects and Perceptions of COVID-19 Vaccination in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯新冠疫苗接种的副作用及认知:一项横断面研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 7;9:899517. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.899517. eCollection 2022.
9
Association between risk perception and influenza vaccine hesitancy for children among reproductive women in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national online survey.新冠疫情期间中国育龄期女性对儿童的风险认知与流感疫苗犹豫的相关性:一项全国性在线调查。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;22(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12782-0.
10
Communicating the risk of side effects to patients: an evaluation of UK regulatory recommendations.向患者传达副作用风险:对英国监管建议的评估
Drug Saf. 2009;32(10):837-49. doi: 10.2165/11316570-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Political orientation of online media sources and reporting of Covid-19 vaccine myocarditis.网络媒体来源的政治倾向与新冠疫苗心肌炎报道。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0296295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296295. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Climate Changes, Natural Resources Depletion, COVID-19 Pandemic, and Russian-Ukrainian War: What Is the Impact on Habits Change and Mental Health?气候变化、自然资源枯竭、COVID-19 大流行和俄乌战争:对习惯改变和心理健康有何影响?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;19(19):11929. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911929.
2
Misinformation About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media: Rapid Review.社交媒体上关于 COVID-19 疫苗的错误信息:快速综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 4;24(8):e37367. doi: 10.2196/37367.
3
Verbal Descriptions of the Probability of Treatment Complications Lead to High Variability in Risk Perceptions: A Survey Study.
口头描述治疗并发症的概率会导致风险感知的高度变化:一项调查研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Apr 1;277(4):e766-e771. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005255. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
4
Imprecision and Preferences in Interpretation of Verbal Probabilities in Health: a Systematic Review.健康领域中言语概率解释的不精确性和偏好:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Dec;36(12):3820-3829. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07050-7. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
5
Current Best Practice for Presenting Probabilities in Patient Decision Aids: Fundamental Principles.当前患者决策辅助工具中呈现概率的最佳实践:基本原则。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):821-833. doi: 10.1177/0272989X21996328. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
6
Social media and vaccine hesitancy.社交媒体与疫苗犹豫
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004206. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
7
The numerical translation of verbal probability expressions by patients and clinicians in the context of peri-operative risk communication.患者和临床医生在围手术期风险沟通中对口头概率表达的数值翻译。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75 Suppl 1:e39-e45. doi: 10.1111/anae.14871.
8
Tapped out or barely tapped? Recommendations for how to harness the vast and largely unused potential of the Mechanical Turk participant pool.已枯竭还是尚未充分开发?关于如何利用 Mechanical Turk 参与者群体这一巨大但尚未充分开发的潜力的建议。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 16;14(12):e0226394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226394. eCollection 2019.
9
Are Mechanical Turk worker samples representative of health status and health behaviors in the U.S.?Mechanical Turk 工人样本是否能代表美国的健康状况和健康行为?
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):e0198835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198835. eCollection 2018.
10
Who Are the Turkers? A Characterization of MTurk Workers Using the Personality Assessment Inventory.《土耳其工人是谁?使用人格评估量表对 MTurk 工人的特征描述》
Assessment. 2019 Jul;26(5):759-766. doi: 10.1177/1073191118760709. Epub 2018 Feb 28.