Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07109-y.
Different fixation methods in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been associated with different revision rates, specifically in the early postoperative period. However, most previous research has either grouped together different fixation types or evaluated femoral-sided fixation or tibial-sided fixation separately. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine ACL revision rates for specific combinations of femoral and tibial fixation methods within 2 years of primary hamstring tendon autograft ACLR based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry (SNKLR).
Patients that underwent primary hamstring tendon autograft ACLR between 2005 and 2018 in the SNKLR were included. The collected data included patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index [BMI]), activity at time of injury, surgical information (concomitant injuries, time from injury to surgery, fixation types at the femur and tibia), and subsequent revision ACLR. Revision rate within 2 years of the index procedure was chosen, as ACLR fixation is most likely to contribute to ACLR revision within the first 2 years, during graft maturation.
Of the 23,238 included patients undergoing primary hamstring ACLR, 581 (2.5%) underwent revision ACLR within 2 years of the index procedure. Among the combinations used for > 300 patients, the femoral metal interference screw/tibial metal interference screw fixation combination had the highest revision rate followed by metal interference screw/resorbable screw and Endobutton/AO screw fixation combinations, with respective revision rates of 4.0, 3.0, and 3.0%. The lowest revision rate within 2 years of ACLR was found in the Endobutton/metal interference screw with backup Osteosuture fixation combination, used in 433 cases, with a failure rate of 0.9%.
Different early ACL revision rates were found across different combinations of femoral and tibial fixation devices within 2 years of primary hamstring tendon autograft ACLR. Metal interference screw fixation, particularly when performed on both the femoral and tibial sides, most frequently resulted in revision ACLR. These findings may be helpful for surgeons in selecting appropriate fixation devices for hamstring ACLR.
IV.
在 ACLR 中,不同的固定方法与不同的翻修率有关,尤其是在术后早期。然而,大多数之前的研究要么将不同的固定类型混为一谈,要么分别评估股骨侧固定或胫骨侧固定。因此,本研究的目的是根据瑞典全国膝关节韧带登记处(SNKLR)的数据,确定在初次腘绳肌腱自体移植物 ACLR 后 2 年内,特定的股骨和胫骨固定方法组合的 ACL 翻修率。
纳入 2005 年至 2018 年期间在 SNKLR 中接受初次腘绳肌腱自体移植物 ACLR 的患者。收集的数据包括患者特征(年龄、性别、体重指数 [BMI])、受伤时的活动情况、手术信息(伴随损伤、受伤至手术的时间、股骨和胫骨的固定类型)以及随后的 ACL 翻修。选择在索引手术后 2 年内的翻修率,因为 ACLR 固定最有可能在最初的 2 年内导致 ACLR 翻修,在此期间移植物成熟。
在 23238 名接受初次腘绳肌腱 ACLR 的患者中,有 581 名(2.5%)在索引手术后 2 年内进行了 ACL 翻修。在 >300 例患者使用的组合中,股骨金属干扰螺钉/胫骨金属干扰螺钉固定组合的翻修率最高,其次是金属干扰螺钉/可吸收螺钉和 Endobutton/AO 螺钉固定组合,分别为 4.0%、3.0%和 3.0%。在初次腘绳肌腱 ACLR 后 2 年内,Endobutton/金属干扰螺钉加备用 Osteosuture 固定组合的翻修率最低,在 433 例中失败率为 0.9%。
在初次腘绳肌腱自体移植物 ACLR 后 2 年内,不同的股骨和胫骨固定装置组合的早期 ACL 翻修率不同。金属干扰螺钉固定,特别是在股骨和胫骨两侧均进行时,最常导致 ACL 翻修。这些发现可能有助于外科医生选择合适的腘绳肌腱 ACLR 固定装置。
IV。