Suppr超能文献

评估中国城市大学的食物供应和更健康的选择:使用中国营养环境商店调查(C-NEMS-S)的案例研究。

Assessing food availability and healthier options in an urban Chinese university: a case study using the Chinese Nutrition Environment Measurement Survey for Stores (C-NEMS-S).

机构信息

Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.

The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050031, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17415-8.

Abstract

Young adults (18-24 years) in universities are frequently exposed to an environment that promotes unhealthy eating behaviors. Using a validated tool, the Chinese Nutrition Environment Measurement Survey for Stores (C-NEMS-S), we assess the food availability and healthier options in a large, urban Chinese university. We employed C-NEMS-S for scoring criteria and weighting. A total of 52 on-campus canteen outlets were audited in an urban university located in Shijiazhuang City, China. General food outlets (n 43) and self-served food outlets (n 7) were further categorized into eight subtypes. Beverage outlets (n 2) were discussed separately from food outlets. C-NEMS-S scores were significantly different across food outlet types (P = 0.0024), especially between noodle and rice outlets (P = 0.0415). Food availability scores for starchy tubers (P < 0.001), dry beans (P < 0.001), vegetables (P = 0.0225), and fruits (P < 0.001) were significantly different across food outlet subtypes. Healthier options were scarce and only appeared in "grains" (n 2) and "meat and poultry" (n 2) categories. Further research on improving the accustomed audit tool and assessing university student diet quality is warranted.

摘要

年轻人(18-24 岁)在大学中经常接触到促进不健康饮食行为的环境。我们使用经过验证的工具,即中国营养环境测量调查商店工具(C-NEMS-S),评估了一所大型城市中国大学中食物的可获得性和更健康的选择。我们采用 C-NEMS-S 进行评分标准和加权。在中国河北省石家庄市的一所城市大学中,对 52 个校内食堂进行了审核。一般食品店(n=43)和自助食品店(n=7)进一步分为八个亚类。饮料店(n=2)与食品店分开讨论。C-NEMS-S 得分在食品店类型之间存在显著差异(P=0.0024),尤其是在面条和米饭店之间(P=0.0415)。淀粉类块茎(P<0.001)、干豆(P<0.001)、蔬菜(P=0.0225)和水果(P<0.001)的食品供应得分在食品店亚类之间存在显著差异。更健康的选择稀缺,仅出现在“谷物”(n=2)和“肉类和家禽”(n=2)类别中。进一步研究改进习惯性审核工具和评估大学生饮食质量是有必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e16d/10759656/6416a2c9e531/12889_2023_17415_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验