• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估电子用药标签的设计和结构以提高患者健康知识和安全性:系统评价。

Evaluation of the design and structure of electronic medication labels to improve patient health knowledge and safety: a systematic review.

机构信息

Belmont University College of Pharmacy, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.

Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 2;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02413-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-023-02413-z
PMID:38167495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10763215/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient misunderstanding of instructions on medication labels is a common cause of medication errors and can result in ineffective treatment. One way to better improve patient comprehension of medication labels is by optimizing the content and display of the information.

OBJECTIVES

To review comparative studies that have evaluated the design of a medication label to improve patient knowledge or safety.

METHODS

Studies were selected from systematic computerized literature searches performed in PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Central (EBSCO), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature-CINAHL (EBSCO), and Web of Science (Thomson Reuters). Eligible studies included comparative studies that evaluated the design of a medication label to improve patient knowledge or safety.

RESULTS

Of the 246 articles identified in the primary literature search, 14 studies were selected for data abstraction. Thirteen of these studies significantly impacted the patient understanding of medication labels. Three studies included a measure of patient safety in terms of medication adherence and dosing errors. The utilization of patient-centered language, pictograms/graphics, color/white space, or font optimization was seen to have the most impact on patient comprehension.

CONCLUSION

It is essential to present medication information in an optimal manner for patients. This can be done by standardizing the content, display, and format of medication labels to improve understanding and medication usage. Evidence-based design principles can, therefore, be used to facilitate the standardization of the structure of label content for both print and electronic devices. However, more research needs to be done on validating the implications of label content display to measure its impact on patient safety.

SYSTEMIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022347510 ( http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ).

摘要

简介

患者对药物标签上的用药说明理解有误,是导致用药错误的常见原因,可能会使治疗无效。改善患者对药物标签理解的一种方法是优化信息的内容和呈现方式。

目的

综述评估药物标签设计以提高患者知识或安全性的对比研究。

方法

从 PubMed、Embase(Elsevier)、Cochrane Central(EBSCO)、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature-CINAHL(EBSCO)和 Web of Science(Thomson Reuters)中进行了系统的计算机文献检索,筛选出评估药物标签设计以提高患者知识或安全性的对比研究。符合条件的研究包括评估药物标签设计以提高患者知识或安全性的对比研究。

结果

在初步文献检索中确定的 246 篇文章中,有 14 篇文章被选中进行数据提取。其中 13 项研究显著影响了患者对药物标签的理解。有 3 项研究从药物依从性和剂量错误方面衡量了患者安全。使用以患者为中心的语言、象形图/图形、颜色/空白或字体优化,对患者理解的影响最大。

结论

以最佳方式向患者呈现药物信息至关重要。可以通过标准化药物标签的内容、呈现和格式来实现这一点,以提高理解和药物使用。因此,可以利用基于证据的设计原则来促进标签内容结构的标准化,包括印刷和电子设备。然而,需要进一步研究验证标签内容显示对患者安全的影响。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42022347510(http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57c4/10763215/bf2ddc1a2c1f/13643_2023_2413_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57c4/10763215/f2e41073f5a4/13643_2023_2413_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57c4/10763215/1753e0d9b296/13643_2023_2413_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57c4/10763215/bf2ddc1a2c1f/13643_2023_2413_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57c4/10763215/f2e41073f5a4/13643_2023_2413_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57c4/10763215/1753e0d9b296/13643_2023_2413_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57c4/10763215/bf2ddc1a2c1f/13643_2023_2413_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the design and structure of electronic medication labels to improve patient health knowledge and safety: a systematic review.评估电子用药标签的设计和结构以提高患者健康知识和安全性:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 2;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02413-z.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Medication administration in aged care facilities: A mixed-methods systematic review.老年护理机构中的药物管理:一项混合方法的系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Feb;81(2):621-640. doi: 10.1111/jan.16318. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
7
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacist-led surgical medicines prescription optimization and prediction service improves patient outcomes - a machine learning based study.由药剂师主导的外科用药处方优化与预测服务可改善患者预后——一项基于机器学习的研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 14;16:1534552. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1534552. eCollection 2025.
2
Evidence-Based Design of Prescription Medication Information: An Updated Scoping Review.基于证据的处方药信息设计:一项更新的范围综述。
Drug Saf. 2025 Jun;48(6):607-641. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01527-8. Epub 2025 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Users' preferences and perceptions of the comprehensibility and readability of medication labels.患者对药品标签的理解度和易读性的偏好和看法。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 22;14(2):e0212173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212173. eCollection 2019.
2
Improving Information Processing: The Effect of Label Format Among Current and Potential Over-the-Counter Medication Users.改善信息处理:标签格式对当前及潜在非处方药使用者的影响
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Sep;50(5):560-568. doi: 10.1177/2168479016641718. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
3
Best-practices for the design and development of prescription medication information: A systematic review.
处方药物信息设计与开发的最佳实践:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1351-1367. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
4
Bilingual Text With or Without Pictograms Improves Elderly Singaporeans' Understanding of Prescription Medication Labels.带或不带象形图的双语文本可提高新加坡老年人对处方药标签的理解。
Gerontologist. 2019 Mar 14;59(2):378-390. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx169.
5
Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: An overview of systematic reviews.患者及公众参与临床试验设计:系统评价概述
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):240-253. doi: 10.1111/jep.12805. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
6
Pictograms, Units and Dosing Tools, and Parent Medication Errors: A Randomized Study.象形图、单位和给药工具与原药用药错误:一项随机研究。
Pediatrics. 2017 Jul;140(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3237.
7
Developing alternative over-the-counter medicine label formats: How do they compare when evaluated by consumers?开发替代非处方药标签格式:消费者评估时它们如何比较?
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Mar;14(3):248-261. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
8
United States Food and Drug Administration Product Label Changes.美国食品药品监督管理局产品标签变更
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017 Feb;10(2):20-29. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
A Patient-Centered Prescription Drug Label to Promote Appropriate Medication Use and Adherence.一份以患者为中心的处方药标签,以促进合理用药和依从性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec;31(12):1482-1489. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3816-x. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
10
FDA drug labeling: rich resources to facilitate precision medicine, drug safety, and regulatory science.FDA 药品标签:丰富资源助力精准医学、药物安全和监管科学。
Drug Discov Today. 2016 Oct;21(10):1566-1570. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 15.