• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性子宫切除术不同手术入路的相关结局:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。

Outcomes associated with different surgical approaches to radical hysterectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Guo Xinmeng, Tian Shuang, Wang Hui, Zhang Jinning, Cheng Yanfei, Yao Yuanqing

机构信息

College of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;160(1):28-37. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14209. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.14209
PMID:35373333
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of five different approaches to cervical cancer surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search for comparative studies on different radical hysterectomy types for cervical cancer in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. All included observational studies used survival analyses to compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing different radical hysterectomy types. All studies were assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale with scores of at least seven points. We extracted the relevant data and conducted a network meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes among five surgical approaches.

RESULTS

Thirty studies (n = 11 353) were included. Robotic surgery had the lowest blood loss volume and hospitalization duration; open surgery had the shortest operative time. Vaginal assisted laparoscopic surgery was associated with the highest number of resected lymph nodes and lowest rate of perioperative complications. Survival outcomes and tumor recurrence outcomes were similar among the approaches.

CONCLUSION

The current approaches to cervical cancer surgery have comparable efficacies.

摘要

目的

评估五种不同宫颈癌手术方法的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和科学网数据库中对不同类型宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的比较研究进行了系统检索。所有纳入的观察性研究均采用生存分析来比较接受不同类型根治性子宫切除术患者的临床结局。所有研究均采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估,得分至少为7分。我们提取了相关数据并进行了网络荟萃分析,以比较五种手术方法的临床结局。

结果

纳入30项研究(n = 11353)。机器人手术的失血量和住院时间最短;开放手术的手术时间最短。阴道辅助腹腔镜手术切除的淋巴结数量最多,围手术期并发症发生率最低。各手术方法的生存结局和肿瘤复发结局相似。

结论

目前的宫颈癌手术方法疗效相当。

相似文献

1
Outcomes associated with different surgical approaches to radical hysterectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.根治性子宫切除术不同手术入路的相关结局:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;160(1):28-37. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14209. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
3
Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.与传统腹腔镜手术和开腹手术相比,机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的手术及临床安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;43(6):994-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.017. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
4
Laparo-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy as a safe option for Minimal Invasive Surgery in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助阴道根治性子宫切除术作为早期宫颈癌微创手术的一种安全选择:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jul;166(1):188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 May 2.
5
Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.不同手术入路在早期宫颈癌围手术期发病率的比较:微创与开腹广泛子宫切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Aug;306(2):295-314. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06248-8. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
6
Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.根治性子宫切除术联合放化疗与单纯根治性子宫切除术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的疗效比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8(8):CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub3.
7
Radical Hysterectomy With Preoperative Conization in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis.早期宫颈癌术前锥切根治性子宫切除术:系统评价及网状 Meta 分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024 Mar;31(3):193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.11.019. Epub 2023 Nov 26.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.早期宫颈癌行微创根治性子宫切除术且不使用子宫操纵器的生存情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2023 Jan;130(2):176-183. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17339. Epub 2022 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis comparing open and minimally invasive cervical tumor surgery wound infection and postoperative complications.一项比较开放性与微创性宫颈肿瘤手术伤口感染及术后并发症的荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02713-8.
2
Cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopy for the management of early-stage cervical cancer: a model-based economic evaluation in China.机器人手术与传统腹腔镜治疗早期宫颈癌的成本效益比较:基于模型的中国经济学评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 20;14(11):e087113. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087113.
3
3D versus 4K laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure after hysterectomy by surgeons in training: a prospective randomised trial.
接受培训的外科医生在子宫切除术后进行3D与4K腹腔镜阴道断端闭合术的前瞻性随机试验
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Sep;16(3):317-323. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.3.029.
4
Comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between different surgical approaches for overweight or obese cervical cancer patients.超重或肥胖宫颈癌患者不同手术方式的手术及肿瘤学结局比较
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 4;18(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01863-4.
5
A meta-analysis examining the impact of open surgical therapy versus minimally invasive surgery on wound infection in females with cervical cancer.一项荟萃分析研究了开放式手术治疗与微创手术治疗对女性宫颈癌患者伤口感染的影响。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14535. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14535. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
6
Comparison of survival outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical hysterectomies for early-stage cervical cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的生存结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Jan;35(1):e9. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e9. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
7
Effect of minimally invasive surgery and laparotomy on wound infection and postoperative and intraoperative complications in the management of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.微创外科与剖腹手术治疗宫颈癌的术中及术后并发症和伤口感染的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Apr;20(4):1061-1071. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13962. Epub 2022 Sep 16.