Zacarías-Pons Lluís, Turró-Garriga Oriol, Saez Marc, Garre-Olmo Josep
Research Group on Aging, Disability and Health, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Catalonia, Spain.
Glòria Compte Research Institute, Fundació Salut Empordà, Figueres, Girona, Spain.
Eur J Ageing. 2024 Jan 3;21(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s10433-023-00795-6.
Multimorbidity, the concurrence of several chronic conditions, is a rising concern that increases the years lived with disability and poses a burden on healthcare systems. Little is known on how it interacts with socioeconomic deprivation, previously associated with poor health-related outcomes. We aimed to characterize the association between multimorbidity and these outcomes and how this relationship may change with socioeconomic development of regions. 55,915 individuals interviewed in 2017 were drawn from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, a population-based study. A Latent Class Analysis was conducted to fit multimorbidity patterns based on 16 self-reported conditions. Physical limitation, quality-of-life and healthcare utilization outcomes were regressed on those patterns adjusting for additional covariates. Those analyses were then extended to assess whether such associations varied with the region socioeconomic status. We identified six different patterns, labelled according to their more predominant chronic conditions. After the "healthy" class, the "metabolic" and the "osteoarticular" classes had the best outcomes involving limitations and the lowest healthcare utilization. The "neuro-affective-ulcer" and the "several conditions" classes yielded the highest probabilities of physical limitation, whereas the "cardiovascular" group had the highest probability of hospitalization. The association of multimorbidity over physical limitations appeared to be stronger when living in a deprived region, especially for metabolic and osteoarticular conditions, whereas no major effect differences were found for healthcare use. Multimorbidity groups do differentiate in terms of limitation and healthcare utilization. Such differences are exacerbated with socioeconomic inequities between regions even within Europe.
多种慢性病并存,即同时患有几种慢性疾病,是一个日益受到关注的问题,它增加了失能生存年数,并给医疗保健系统带来负担。对于它如何与社会经济剥夺相互作用,人们知之甚少,而社会经济剥夺此前被认为与健康相关的不良后果有关。我们旨在描述多种慢性病并存与这些后果之间的关联,以及这种关系如何随着地区的社会经济发展而变化。2017年接受访谈的55915人来自欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查,这是一项基于人群的研究。我们进行了潜在类别分析,以根据16种自我报告的疾病来拟合多种慢性病并存模式。根据这些模式对身体功能受限、生活质量和医疗保健利用结果进行回归分析,并对其他协变量进行调整。然后扩展这些分析,以评估这种关联是否因地区社会经济地位而异。我们确定了六种不同的模式,并根据其更主要的慢性病进行标记。在“健康”类别之后,“代谢性”和“骨关节性”类别在身体功能受限方面的结果最佳,医疗保健利用率最低。“神经-情感-溃疡”和“多种疾病”类别出现身体功能受限的概率最高,而“心血管”组住院的概率最高。生活在贫困地区时,多种慢性病并存与身体功能受限之间的关联似乎更强,尤其是对于代谢性和骨关节性疾病,而在医疗保健使用方面未发现重大影响差异。多种慢性病并存的群体在身体功能受限和医疗保健利用方面确实存在差异。即使在欧洲内部,这些差异也会因地区之间的社会经济不平等而加剧。