*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2023 Nov-Dec;113(6). doi: 10.7547/21-135.
The Sanders classification is a widely used method for classifying calcaneal fractures. Type IV fractures (>4 fragments) are known to vary in the number of fracture fragments. However, all relevant cases are classified as type IV irrespective of the number of fragments. We investigated the need for evaluation of postoperative prognoses based on radiologic factors and subtypes of Sanders classification type IV fractures.
Fifty-six Sanders type IV calcaneal fractures were enrolled between 2010 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups according to the number of fragments: four fragments (group 1) and more than four fragments (group 2). Radiologic evaluation was performed using a postoperative recovery percentage calculated from postoperative reduction of the Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and vertical height. Radiologic evaluation was divided into two groups according to postoperative recovery: good and bad recovery groups. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used for clinical outcome evaluation.
There was no significant difference in AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score (P = .909) or VAS score (P = .963) between groups 1 and 2. However, there was a significant (P = .001) difference in AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score or VAS score between good and bad recovery groups.
Clinical results of Sanders type IV fractures were not related to the number of bone fragments but to the degree of injury to the Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and vertical height. Therefore, subtype classification of type IV calcaneal fractures is superfluous, and it is important to try to restore these parameters during surgery.
桑德斯分类法是一种广泛用于分类跟骨骨折的方法。已知 IV 型骨折(>4 块碎片)在骨折碎片数量上有所不同。然而,所有相关病例均被分类为 IV 型,而不论碎片数量如何。我们研究了根据放射学因素和桑德斯 IV 型骨折亚型评估术后预后的必要性。
2010 年至 2018 年期间共纳入 56 例桑德斯 IV 型跟骨骨折患者。根据骨折块的数量将患者分为两组:4 块骨折块(组 1)和 4 块以上骨折块(组 2)。术后采用从 Böhler 角、Gissane 角和垂直高度的术后复位百分比来进行放射学评估。根据术后恢复情况将放射学评估分为两组:恢复良好组和恢复不良组。美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝关节后足评分和视觉模拟评分(VAS)用于临床结果评估。
组 1 和组 2 之间 AOFAS 踝关节后足评分(P=0.909)或 VAS 评分(P=0.963)无显著差异。然而,在恢复良好组和恢复不良组之间 AOFAS 踝关节后足评分或 VAS 评分有显著差异(P=0.001)。
桑德斯 IV 型骨折的临床结果与骨碎片数量无关,而与 Böhler 角、Gissane 角和垂直高度的损伤程度有关。因此,IV 型跟骨骨折的亚型分类是多余的,在手术中尝试恢复这些参数很重要。