Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Global Regulatory Policy, Merck Research Laboratories, MSD (Europe) Inc., Brussels, Belgium.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Mar;58(2):336-346. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00601-6. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
This qualitative study aims to analyze current PM regulation and market access requirements and proposes potential solutions to mitigate current challenges.
Twenty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts from pharmaceutical industry, regulatory authorities, national health technology assessment (HTA) bodies, pediatricians, and academia from the Netherlands (NL), Germany (DE), the United Kingdom (UK), and France (FR) to get insight into the pediatric research, the regulatory and reimbursement processes, challenges, and solutions. Themes for further testing were developed on how to facilitate pediatric market access. Atlas.ti 9 was used to analyze the findings.
Heterogeneity in requirements for the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and HTA approvals are noted. By example, DE grants direct reimbursement after regulatory approval, the other countries require additional reimbursement which generate delays and challenges in patient access after marketing authorization. Key components in facilitating PM market access include multi-stakeholder collaboration, transparency, patient representatives, informed consent guidance, real-world evidence, and appropriate clinical trial designs. Pricing models based on the economic capabilities of individual countries could further reduce delays and challenges in market access. The additional specific pediatric incentives should be taken as best practice to encourage innovation in pediatric conditions.
This study highlights differences in requirements for regulatory and reimbursement approval, along with international differences in pricing and reimbursement procedures for pediatric market access.
本定性研究旨在分析当前的儿科药品监管和市场准入要求,并提出潜在解决方案以减轻当前面临的挑战。
在荷兰(NL)、德国(DE)、英国(UK)和法国(FR),对来自制药行业、监管机构、国家卫生技术评估(HTA)机构、儿科医生和学术界的 22 名专家进行了 22 次半结构化访谈,以深入了解儿科研究、监管和报销流程、挑战和解决方案。还针对如何促进儿科市场准入的主题进行了进一步的测试。使用 Atlas.ti 9 对研究结果进行了分析。
注意到欧洲药品管理局(EMA)和 HTA 审批要求存在差异。例如,DE 在监管批准后直接给予报销,而其他国家则需要额外的报销,这导致上市授权后患者获得药物的延迟和困难。促进儿科药品市场准入的关键因素包括多利益相关者合作、透明度、患者代表、知情同意指导、真实世界证据和适当的临床试验设计。基于个别国家经济能力的定价模式也可以进一步减少市场准入的延迟和挑战。此外,儿科激励措施应作为最佳实践,以鼓励儿科疾病的创新。
本研究强调了监管和报销审批要求的差异,以及儿科市场准入在定价和报销程序方面的国际差异。