Applied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group-School of Physical Education and Sport and Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Center of Lifestyle Medicine; Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024 Feb 1;136(2):421-429. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00670.2023. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
The magnitude of muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training (RT) is highly variable between individuals (response heterogeneity). Manipulations in RT variables may modulate RT-related response heterogeneity; yet, this remains to be determined. Using a within-subject unilateral design, we aimed to investigate the effects of RT volume manipulation on whole muscle hypertrophy [quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area (qCSA)] among nonresponders and responders to a low RT dose (single-set). We also investigated the effects of RT volume manipulation on muscle strength in these responsiveness groups. Eighty-five older individuals [41M/44F, age = 68 ± 4 yr; body mass index (BMI) = 26.4 ± 3.7 kg/m] had one leg randomly allocated to a single (1)-set and the contralateral leg allocated to four sets of unilateral knee-extension RT at 8-15 repetition maximum (RM) for 10-wk 2 days/wk. Pre- and postintervention, participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and unilateral knee-extension 1-RM strength testing. MRI typical error (2× TE = 3.27%) was used to classify individuals according to responsiveness patterns. = 51 were classified as nonresponders (≤2× TE) and = 34 as responders (>2× TE) based on pre- to postintervention change qCSA following the single-set RT protocol. Nonresponders to single-set training showed a dose response, with significant time × set interactions for qCSA and 1-RM strength, indicating greater gains in response to the higher volume prescription (time × set: < 0.05 for both outcomes). Responders improved qCSA (time: < 0.001), with a tendency toward higher benefit from the four sets RT protocol (time × set: = 0.08); on the other hand, 1-RM increased similarly irrespectively of RT volume prescription (time × set: > 0.05). Our findings support the use of higher RT volume to mitigate nonresponsiveness among older adults. Using a within-subject unilateral design, we demonstrated that increasing resistance training (RT) volume may be a simple, effective strategy to improve muscle hypertrophy and strength gains among older adults who do not respond to low-volume RT. In addition, it could most likely be used to further improve hypertrophic outcomes in responders.
抗阻训练(RT)引起的肌肉肥大程度在个体之间差异很大(反应异质性)。RT 变量的操作可能会调节与 RT 相关的反应异质性;然而,这仍有待确定。本研究采用单因素设计,旨在探讨 RT 量的操作对低 RT 剂量(单组)无反应者和有反应者的整体肌肉肥大[股四头肌横截面积(qCSA)]的影响。我们还研究了 RT 量的操作对这些反应性组肌肉力量的影响。85 名老年人[41M/44F,年龄=68±4 岁;体重指数(BMI)=26.4±3.7kg/m]的一条腿随机分配到单组(1 组),另一条腿分配到四组单侧膝关节伸展 RT,每组 8-15 次重复最大(RM),每周 2 天,共 10 周。干预前后,参与者接受磁共振成像(MRI)和单侧膝关节伸展 1-RM 力量测试。MRI 典型误差(2×TE=3.27%)用于根据预干预后 qCSA 的变化,根据反应模式对个体进行分类。根据单组 RT 方案后 qCSA 的变化,51 名参与者被归类为无反应者(≤2×TE),34 名参与者被归类为有反应者(>2×TE)。无反应者对单组训练表现出剂量反应,qCSA 和 1-RM 强度均显示出时间×组间的显著交互作用,表明对更高体积处方的反应更大(时间×组:均<0.05)。有反应者 qCSA 增加(时间:<0.001),对四组 RT 方案的获益趋势更高(时间×组:=0.08);另一方面,1-RM 增加的方式相似,与 RT 体积处方无关(时间×组:>0.05)。我们的研究结果支持使用更高的 RT 量来减轻老年人的无反应性。采用单因素设计,我们证明增加抗阻训练(RT)量可能是一种简单有效的策略,可以提高对低 RT 量无反应的老年人的肌肉肥大和力量增加。此外,它很可能用于进一步提高有反应者的肥大效果。