Scarpelli Maíra C, Nóbrega Sanmy R, Santanielo Natalia, Alvarez Ieda F, Otoboni Gabriele B, Ugrinowitsch Carlos, Libardi Cleiton A
MUSCULAB-Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil ; and.
School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Apr 1;36(4):1153-1157. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003558.
Scarpelli, MC, Nóbrega, SR, Santanielo, N, Alvarez, IF, Otoboni, GB, Ugrinowitsch, C, and Libardi, CA. Muscle hypertrophy response is affected by previous resistance training volume in trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res 36(4): 1153-1157, 2022-The purpose of this study was to compare gains in muscle mass of trained individuals after a resistance training (RT) protocol with standardized (i.e., nonindividualized) volume (N-IND), with an RT protocol using individualized volume (IND). In a within-subject approach, 16 subjects had one leg randomly assigned to N-IND (22 sets·wk-1, based on the number of weekly sets prescribed in studies) and IND (1.2 × sets·wk-1 recorded in training logs) protocols. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was assessed by ultrasound imaging at baseline (Pre) and after 8 weeks (Post) of RT, and the significance level was set at p < 0.05. Changes in the vastus lateralis CSA (difference from Pre to Post) were significantly higher for the IND protocol (p = 0.042; mean difference: 1.08 cm2; confidence interval [CI]: 0.04-2.11). The inferential analysis was confirmed by the CI of the effect size (0.75; CI: 0.03-1.47). Also, the IND protocol had a higher proportion of individuals with greater muscle hypertrophy than the typical error of the measurement (chi-square, p = 0.0035; estimated difference = 0.5, CI: 0.212-0.787). In conclusion, individualizing the weekly training volume of research protocols provides greater gains in muscle CSA than prescribing a group standard RT volume.
斯卡佩利,MC;诺布雷加,SR;桑塔涅洛,N;阿尔瓦雷斯,IF;奥托博尼,GB;乌格里诺维茨,C;利巴尔迪,CA。肌肉肥大反应受训练个体先前抗阻训练量的影响。《力量与体能研究杂志》36(4): 1153 - 1157,2022年——本研究的目的是比较训练个体在采用标准化(即非个体化)训练量(N - IND)的抗阻训练(RT)方案后与采用个体化训练量(IND)的RT方案后的肌肉量增加情况。在一项受试者自身对照研究中,16名受试者的一条腿被随机分配到N - IND方案(每周22组,基于研究中规定的每周组数)和IND方案(根据训练日志记录的每周组数的1.2倍)。在RT开始前(Pre)和8周后(Post)通过超声成像评估肌肉横截面积(CSA),显著性水平设定为p < 0.05。IND方案的股外侧肌CSA变化(从Pre到Post的差值)显著更高(p = 0.042;平均差值:1.08平方厘米;置信区间[CI]:0.04 - 2.11)。效应量的CI(0.75;CI:0.03 - 1.47)证实了推断性分析。此外,与测量的典型误差相比,IND方案中肌肉肥大程度更高的个体比例更高(卡方检验,p = 0.0035;估计差值 = 0.5,CI:0.212 - 0.787)。总之,与规定一组标准的RT训练量相比,个体化研究方案的每周训练量能使肌肉CSA获得更大的增长。