• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A survey of what legal populations believe and know about inattentional blindness and visual detection.关于注意瞬脱和视觉检测,法律人群的信念和认知调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 5;19(1):e0296489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296489. eCollection 2024.
2
Are Familiar Objects More Likely to Be Noticed in an Inattentional Blindness Task?在无意视盲任务中,熟悉的物体是否更易被注意到?
J Cogn. 2024 Feb 22;7(1):28. doi: 10.5334/joc.352. eCollection 2024.
3
Inattentional blindness for a gun during a simulated police vehicle stop.在模拟警车拦截过程中对一把枪的无意视盲。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0074-3. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
4
Similarity of an unexpected object to the attended and ignored objects affects noticing in a sustained inattentional blindness task.在持续的非注意盲视任务中,意外物体与被关注和被忽略物体的相似性会影响对其的察觉。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Oct;85(7):2150-2169. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02794-2. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
5
Now or never: noticing occurs early in sustained inattentional blindness.机不可失:持续性注意力不集中失明中察觉出现得很早。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Nov 20;6(11):191333. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191333. eCollection 2019 Nov.
6
Inattentional blindness in medicine.医学中的无意视盲。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Mar 27;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00537-x.
7
Moderate movement, more vision: effects of physical exercise on inattentional blindness.适度运动,视野更开阔:体育锻炼对非注意盲视的影响
Perception. 2012;41(8):963-75. doi: 10.1068/p7294.
8
Individual differences in inattentional blindness.注意盲视的个体差异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1471-1502. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02431-x. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
9
Does experiencing inattentional blindness for crime influence eyewitness recall?注意缺陷盲视对犯罪目击者的回忆是否有影响?
Memory. 2022 Feb;30(2):206-216. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.2002906. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
10
The invisible 800-pound gorilla: expertise can increase inattentional blindness.看不见的 800 磅大猩猩:专业知识会增加非注意盲视。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 May 29;8(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00486-x.

本文引用的文献

1
The visible gorilla: Unexpected fast-not physically salient-Objects are noticeable.可见的大猩猩:意想不到的快速——不是物理上显著的——物体是显而易见的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 30;120(22):e2214930120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214930120. Epub 2023 May 22.
2
Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA.在线人体研究中的数据质量:MTurk、ProLific、CloudResearch、Qualtrics 和 SONA 之间的比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 14;18(3):e0279720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279720. eCollection 2023.
3
Laypeople's perceptions of the effects of event repetition, reporting delay, and emotion on children's and adults' memory.非专业人士对事件重复、报告延迟和情绪对儿童和成人记忆的影响的看法。
Memory. 2023 Feb;31(2):205-217. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2135737. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
4
Does Expertise Reduce Rates of Inattentional Blindness? A Meta-Analysis.专业知识是否能降低疏忽性盲视的发生率?一项荟萃分析。
Perception. 2022 Feb;51(2):131-147. doi: 10.1177/03010066211072466. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
5
Does experiencing inattentional blindness for crime influence eyewitness recall?注意缺陷盲视对犯罪目击者的回忆是否有影响?
Memory. 2022 Feb;30(2):206-216. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.2002906. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
6
The effects of stress on eyewitness memory: A survey of memory experts and laypeople.压力对目击证人记忆的影响:一项针对记忆专家和普通民众的调查。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Apr;49(3):401-421. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01115-4. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
7
Legal Representatives' Opinions regarding Psychologists Engaging in Expert Witness Services in Australian Courts and Tribunals.法定代表人关于心理学家在澳大利亚法院和法庭提供专家证人服务的意见。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2016 Nov 24;24(2):223-232. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1254589. eCollection 2017.
8
Exploiting failures in metacognition through magic: Visual awareness as a source of visual metacognition bias.通过魔法利用元认知的失败:视觉意识作为视觉元认知偏差的来源。
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Oct;65:152-168. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
9
Alcohol increases inattentional blindness when cognitive resources are not consumed by ongoing task demands.当认知资源不被持续任务需求消耗时,酒精会增加非注意盲视。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Jan;235(1):309-315. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4772-9. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
10
Inattentional blindness for a gun during a simulated police vehicle stop.在模拟警车拦截过程中对一把枪的无意视盲。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0074-3. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

关于注意瞬脱和视觉检测,法律人群的信念和认知调查。

A survey of what legal populations believe and know about inattentional blindness and visual detection.

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jan 5;19(1):e0296489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296489. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0296489
PMID:38180989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10769081/
Abstract

Inattentional blindness refers to when people fail to notice obvious and unexpected events when their attention is elsewhere. Existing research suggests that inattentional blindness is a poorly understood concept that violates the beliefs that are commonly held by the public about vision and attention. Given that legal cases may involve individuals who may have experienced inattentional blindness, it is important to understand the beliefs legal populations and members of the community have about inattentional blindness, and their general familiarity and experience with the concept. Australian police officers (n = 94) and lawyers (n = 98), along with psychology students (n = 99) and community members (n = 100) completed a survey where they: a) stated whether an individual would have noticed an event in six legal vignettes, b) rated whether factors would make an individual more, less, or just as likely to notice an unexpected event, c) reported their familiarity with and personal experiences of inattentional blindness, and d) indicated whether they believed individuals could make themselves more likely to notice unexpected events. Respondents in all populations frequently responded "yes" to detecting the unexpected event in most legal vignettes. They also held misconceptions about some factors (expertise and threat) that would influence the noticing of unexpected events. Additionally, personal experiences with inattentional blindness were commonly reported. Finally, respondents provided strategies for what individuals can do to make themselves more likely to notice of unexpected events, despite a lack of evidence to support them. Overall, these findings provide direction for where education and training could be targeted to address misconceptions about inattentional blindness held by legal populations, which may lead to improved decision-making in legal settings.

摘要

疏忽性盲视是指当人们的注意力不在某个地方时,他们会忽略明显且意料之外的事件。现有研究表明,疏忽性盲视是一个人们理解甚少的概念,它违反了公众普遍持有的关于视觉和注意力的信念。鉴于法律案件可能涉及可能经历过疏忽性盲视的个人,了解法律人群体和社区成员对疏忽性盲视的信念,以及他们对该概念的一般熟悉程度和经验,是很重要的。澳大利亚警察(n = 94)和律师(n = 98),以及心理学学生(n = 99)和社区成员(n = 100)完成了一项调查,他们:a)在六个法律案例中陈述一个人是否会注意到一个事件,b)评估哪些因素会使人更有可能、不太可能或同样注意到一个意外事件,c)报告他们对疏忽性盲视的熟悉程度和个人经验,以及 d)表明他们是否认为个人可以使自己更有可能注意到意外事件。所有人群的受访者在大多数法律案例中都经常回答“是”,可以检测到意外事件。他们还对一些会影响意外事件注意的因素(专业知识和威胁)存在误解。此外,人们经常报告自己有疏忽性盲视的经历。最后,受访者提供了一些策略,说明个人可以做些什么来提高自己注意到意外事件的可能性,尽管缺乏证据支持这些策略。总的来说,这些发现为针对法律人群体对疏忽性盲视的误解进行教育和培训指明了方向,这可能会导致法律环境中的决策得到改善。