• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Youtube 作为迷走神经刺激信息源:一项质量分析。

Youtube as a source of information vagal nerve stimulation: A quality analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Neurology , Gaziantep University School of Medicine , Gaziantep, Turkey.

Department of Public Health, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2024 Feb;151:109597. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109597. Epub 2024 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109597
PMID:38181534
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the quality of available information on Youtube videos about VNS as a "source of health information" for patients with drug resistant epilepsy.

METHODS

Youtube videos were searched and screened using the terms "VNS for seizures," and "VNS surgery," "VNS epilepsy" in May 2023. The quality of the videos was evaluated the Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information (DISCERN) and Global Quality Scale (GQS). The videos were analyzed in terms of content, accuracy, reliability, and quality.

RESULTS

A total of 104 videos were searched. After excluding duplicate or inappropriate videos, 51 videos were analyzed. Youtube videos about vagal nerve stimulation are mostly on general information, surgical procedures, patient experiences and magnet use. When video sources are examined according to the quality, according to GQS, 75 % of high quality videos were narrated by physicians, all intermediate quality videos were narrated by physicians, and low quality ones narrated by physicians were 47.4 % and 28.9 % by the patients. All of the videos narrated by the patients were of low quality. There was a significant and strong correlation between GQS and Discern score (r = 0.807, p < 0.001). Only GQS scores of videos with different content were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). Two pediatric neurologists independently reviewed the videos and classified the videos as useful or misleading according to the GQS, DISCERN scala. The overall κ value for interobserver consistency according to Global Quality Scale was 0.781 (p < 0.001). (95 % confidence interval), indicating a very good level of agreement.

CONCLUSION

Youtube videos may provide a worthful source for patients and parents seeking to find more information about VNS However incorrect information could easily be disseminated by high number of views of videos with low quality. High skilled and experienced professionals should create videos on Youtube to ensure that patients and parents can access more useful, high-quality, and accurate information on VNS.

摘要

目的

评估 YouTube 视频中关于迷走神经刺激(VNS)作为耐药性癫痫患者“健康信息来源”的可用信息的质量。

方法

2023 年 5 月,使用“癫痫发作的 VNS”和“VNS 手术”、“VNS 癫痫”等术语在 YouTube 上搜索和筛选视频。使用消费者健康信息质量标准(DISCERN)和全球质量量表(GQS)评估视频质量。从内容、准确性、可靠性和质量方面对视频进行分析。

结果

共搜索到 104 个视频。排除重复或不适当的视频后,分析了 51 个视频。关于迷走神经刺激的 YouTube 视频主要是关于一般信息、手术程序、患者体验和磁铁使用。根据质量检查视频来源,根据 GQS,75%的高质量视频由医生解说,所有中等质量的视频由医生解说,低质量的视频中由医生解说的分别为 47.4%和 28.9%,由患者解说的为低质量。所有由患者解说的视频质量都较低。GQS 和 Discern 评分之间存在显著且强的相关性(r=0.807,p<0.001)。仅发现不同内容视频的 GQS 评分具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。两名儿科神经科医生独立审查视频,并根据 GQS 和 Discern 量表将视频分类为有用或误导。根据全球质量量表,观察者间一致性的总体κ值为 0.781(p<0.001)(95%置信区间),表明存在非常好的一致性水平。

结论

YouTube 视频可能为寻求了解更多 VNS 信息的患者和家长提供有价值的来源。但是,低质量视频的高浏览量可能会轻易传播错误信息。应让高技能和经验丰富的专业人员在 YouTube 上制作视频,以确保患者和家长可以访问更多关于 VNS 的有用、高质量和准确的信息。

相似文献

1
Youtube as a source of information vagal nerve stimulation: A quality analysis.Youtube 作为迷走神经刺激信息源:一项质量分析。
Epilepsy Behav. 2024 Feb;151:109597. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109597. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
2
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.YouTube 上遗尿症视频的质量分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
The efficacy and reliability of English YouTube videos as a source of information for pregnant rheumatoid arthritis patients.英文 YouTube 视频作为类风湿关节炎孕妇信息来源的疗效和可靠性。
Clin Rheumatol. 2023 Dec;42(12):3311-3320. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06780-9. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
4
YouTube as a source of information on systemic sclerosis.YouTube 作为系统性硬皮病信息来源。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2022 Aug;25(8):887-892. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14363. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
5
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
6
YouTube as a Source of Information for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke: A Quality, Reliability and Accuracy Analysis.YouTube 作为脑卒中患者经颅磁刺激的信息来源:一项质量、可靠性和准确性分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105309. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105309. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
7
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
8
Evaluation of educational value of YouTube videos addressing robotic pyeloplasty in children.评估针对儿童机器人肾盂成形术的 YouTube 视频的教育价值。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Jun;17(3):390.e1-390.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.12.025. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
9
Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.评估 YouTube 视频作为经皮神经电刺激信息源的可靠性和质量。
PeerJ. 2023 Jul 21;11:e15412. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15412. eCollection 2023.
10
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.