• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ChatGPT-4.0与谷歌:哪一个能为患者关于关节镜半月板修复的问题提供更多学术性答案?

ChatGPT-4.0 vs. Google: Which Provides More Academic Answers to Patients' Questions on Arthroscopic Meniscus Repair?

作者信息

Eryilmaz Atahan, Aydin Mahmud, Turemis Cihangir, Surucu Serkan

机构信息

Orthopedic Surgery, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.

Orthopedic Surgery, Sisli Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Dec 25;16(12):e76380. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76380. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.76380
PMID:39867098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11760333/
Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of a Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) to provide academic answers to frequently asked questions using a comparison with Google web search FAQs and answers. This study attempted to determine what patients ask on Google and ChatGPT and whether ChatGPT and Google provide factual information for patients about arthroscopic meniscus repair. Method A cleanly installed Google Chrome browser and ChatGPT were used to ensure no individual cookies, browsing history, other side data, or sponsored sites. The term "arthroscopic meniscus repair" was entered into the Google Chrome browser and ChatGPT. The first 15 frequently asked questions (FAQs), answers, and sources of answers to FAQs were identified from both ChatGPT and Google search engines. Results Timeline of recovery (20%) and technical details (20%) were the most commonly asked question categories of a total of 30 questions. Technical details and timeline of recovery questions were more commonly asked on ChatGPT compared to Google (technical detail: 33.3% vs. 6.6%, p=0.168; timeline of recovery: 26.6% vs. 13.3%, p=0.651). Answers to questions were more commonly from academic websites in website categories in ChatGPT compared to Google (93.3% vs. 20%, p=0.0001). The most common answers to frequently asked questions were academic (20%) and commercial (20%) in Google. Conclusion Compared to Google, ChatGPT provided significantly fewer references to commercial content and offered responses that were more aligned with academic sources. ChatGPT may be a valuable adjunct in patient education when used under physician supervision, ensuring information aligns with evidence-based practices.

摘要

目的 本研究的目的是通过与谷歌网络搜索常见问题解答及答案进行比较,评估聊天生成预训练变换器(ChatGPT)提供学术性常见问题答案的能力。本研究试图确定患者在谷歌和ChatGPT上询问的内容,以及ChatGPT和谷歌是否为患者提供有关关节镜半月板修复的事实性信息。方法 使用干净安装的谷歌浏览器和ChatGPT,以确保没有个人cookies、浏览历史、其他附带数据或赞助网站。在谷歌浏览器和ChatGPT中输入“关节镜半月板修复”一词。从ChatGPT和谷歌搜索引擎中识别出前15个常见问题、答案及答案来源。结果 在总共30个问题中,恢复时间线(20%)和技术细节(20%)是最常被问到的问题类别。与谷歌相比,ChatGPT上关于技术细节和恢复时间线的问题更常见(技术细节:33.3%对6.6%,p = 0.168;恢复时间线:26.6%对13.3%,p = 0.651)。与谷歌相比,ChatGPT中问题答案在网站类别上更常见于学术网站(93.3%对20%,p = 0.0001)。在谷歌上,常见问题的最常见答案是学术性的(20%)和商业性的(20%)。结论 与谷歌相比,ChatGPT提供的商业内容参考显著更少,其提供的回答更符合学术来源。在医生监督下使用时,ChatGPT在患者教育中可能是一个有价值的辅助工具,可确保信息符合循证实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165b/11760333/e76d13baea4d/cureus-0016-00000076380-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165b/11760333/4bcb851132b7/cureus-0016-00000076380-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165b/11760333/e76d13baea4d/cureus-0016-00000076380-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165b/11760333/4bcb851132b7/cureus-0016-00000076380-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165b/11760333/e76d13baea4d/cureus-0016-00000076380-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
ChatGPT-4.0 vs. Google: Which Provides More Academic Answers to Patients' Questions on Arthroscopic Meniscus Repair?ChatGPT-4.0与谷歌:哪一个能为患者关于关节镜半月板修复的问题提供更多学术性答案?
Cureus. 2024 Dec 25;16(12):e76380. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76380. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Is ChatGPT a more academic source than google searches for patient questions about hip arthroscopy? An analysis of the most frequently asked questions.对于患者关于髋关节镜检查的问题,ChatGPT 比谷歌搜索是更具学术性的信息来源吗?对最常见问题的分析。
J ISAKOS. 2025 Jun;12:100892. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100892. Epub 2025 May 3.
3
Do ChatGPT and Google differ in answers to commonly asked patient questions regarding total shoulder and total elbow arthroplasty?ChatGPT 和谷歌在回答有关全肩和全肘人工关节置换术的常见患者问题方面是否存在差异?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Aug;33(8):e429-e437. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.014. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
4
Understanding How ChatGPT May Become a Clinical Administrative Tool Through an Investigation on the Ability to Answer Common Patient Questions Concerning Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries.通过对ChatGPT回答有关尺侧副韧带损伤常见患者问题能力的调查,了解其如何成为临床管理工具。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jul 31;12(7):23259671241257516. doi: 10.1177/23259671241257516. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Using a Google Web Search Analysis to Assess the Utility of ChatGPT in Total Joint Arthroplasty.利用谷歌网页搜索分析评估 ChatGPT 在全关节置换中的效用。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7):1195-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
6
ChatGPT-4 Performs Clinical Information Retrieval Tasks Using Consistently More Trustworthy Resources Than Does Google Search for Queries Concerning the Latarjet Procedure.对于有关拉塔热手术的查询,ChatGPT-4在执行临床信息检索任务时,使用的资源始终比谷歌搜索更可靠。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Mar;41(3):588-597. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
7
ChatGPT and Google Provide Mostly Excellent or Satisfactory Responses to the Most Frequently Asked Patient Questions Related to Rotator Cuff Repair.ChatGPT和谷歌对与肩袖修复相关的最常见患者问题大多提供了极佳或令人满意的回答。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Jun 25;6(5):100963. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100963. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Dr. Google vs. Dr. ChatGPT: Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology by Comparing the Accuracy, Safety, and Readability of Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions Regarding Cataracts and Cataract Surgery.谷歌医生与ChatGPT医生:通过比较关于白内障及白内障手术的常见患者问题的回答的准确性、安全性和可读性,探索人工智能在眼科领域的应用。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;39(6):472-479. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2024.2326058. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
9
Evaluating ChatGPT's Utility in Medicine Guidelines Through Web Search Analysis.通过网络搜索分析评估 ChatGPT 在医学指南中的效用。
Perm J. 2024 Jun 14;28(2):55-69. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.126. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
10
Effectiveness of a large language model for clinical information retrieval regarding shoulder arthroplasty.大型语言模型用于肩关节置换临床信息检索的有效性
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Dec 17;11(4):e70114. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70114. eCollection 2024 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Quality, Usefulness, and Reliability of Large Language Models (ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Gemini) in Answering General Questions Regarding Dyslexia and Dyscalculia.评估大型语言模型(ChatGPT、豆包和Gemini)在回答有关阅读障碍和计算障碍的一般问题时的质量、实用性和可靠性。 (注:原文中的DeepSeek在国内一般被称为豆包 )
Psychiatr Q. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s11126-025-10170-6.

本文引用的文献

1
We Need RI and Not Just AI! Thoughts on the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Spine Surgery Specifically.我们需要的是放射影像学(RI)而不仅仅是人工智能(AI)!关于人工智能在医学尤其是脊柱外科领域应用的思考。
Global Spine J. 2024 Nov;14(8):2213-2215. doi: 10.1177/21925682241272348.
2
ChatGPT-4 Performs Clinical Information Retrieval Tasks Using Consistently More Trustworthy Resources Than Does Google Search for Queries Concerning the Latarjet Procedure.对于有关拉塔热手术的查询,ChatGPT-4在执行临床信息检索任务时,使用的资源始终比谷歌搜索更可靠。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Mar;41(3):588-597. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
3
Google Bard and ChatGPT in Orthopedics: Which Is the Better Doctor in Sports Medicine and Pediatric Orthopedics? The Role of AI in Patient Education.
骨科领域的谷歌巴德和ChatGPT:在运动医学和小儿骨科方面,哪个是更出色的“医生”?人工智能在患者教育中的作用。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 13;14(12):1253. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14121253.
4
Using Google web search to analyze and evaluate the application of ChatGPT in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.利用谷歌网页搜索分析和评估 ChatGPT 在股骨髋臼撞击综合征中的应用。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 31;12:1412063. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1412063. eCollection 2024.
5
What are our patients asking Google about acromioclavicular joint injuries?-frequently asked online questions and the quality of online resources.我们的患者在谷歌上询问了哪些关于肩锁关节损伤的问题?——常见的在线问题及在线资源质量
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Feb 27;4(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.02.001. eCollection 2024 May.
6
How Does ChatGPT Use Source Information Compared With Google? A Text Network Analysis of Online Health Information.ChatGPT 与谷歌相比如何使用来源信息?在线健康信息的文本网络分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Apr 1;482(4):578-588. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002995. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
7
GPT-4 as a Source of Patient Information for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparative Analysis Against Google Web Search.GPT-4作为颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术患者信息来源:与谷歌网络搜索的比较分析
Global Spine J. 2024 Nov;14(8):2389-2398. doi: 10.1177/21925682241241241. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
8
ChatGPT Can Offer Satisfactory Responses to Common Patient Questions Regarding Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.ChatGPT能够对有关肘部尺侧副韧带重建的常见患者问题提供令人满意的回答。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 13;6(2):100893. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100893. eCollection 2024 Apr.
9
ChatGPT Provides Unsatisfactory Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.ChatGPT 对前交叉韧带重建相关常见问题的回答不尽如人意。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Jul;40(7):2067-2079.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.017. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
10
Assessment of Quality and Readability of Information Provided by ChatGPT in Relation to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.ChatGPT提供的关于前交叉韧带损伤信息的质量和可读性评估
J Pers Med. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):104. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010104.