• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌切除术手术方法的演变:一项多国登记评估。

Evolution of surgical approach to rectal cancer resection: A multinational registry assessment.

机构信息

Dutch ColoRectal Audit (DCRA), Leiden, Netherlands.

Bowel Cancer Outcomes Registry (BCOR), Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jan 6;39(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04578-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-023-04578-4
PMID:38183451
Abstract

PURPOSE

Surgical approach to rectal cancer has evolved in recent decades, with introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques and local excision. Since implementation might differ internationally, this study is aimed at evaluating trends in surgical approach to rectal cancer across different countries over the last 10 years and to gain insight into patient, tumour and treatment characteristics.

METHODS

Pseudo-anonymised data of patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer between 2010 and 2019 were extracted from clinical audits in the Netherlands (NL), Sweden (SE), England-Wales (EW) and Australia-New Zealand (AZ).

RESULTS

Ninety-nine thousand five hundred ninety-seven patients were included (38,413 open, 55,155 MIS and 5416 local excision). An overall increase in MIS was observed from 29.9% in 2010 to 72.1% in 2019, with decreasing conversion rates (17.5-9.0%). The MIS proportion was highly variable between countries in the period 2010-2014 (54.4% NL, 45.3% EW, 39.8% AZ, 14.1% SE, P < 0.001), but variation reduced over time (2015-2019 78.8% NL, 66.3% EW, 64.3% AZ, 53.2% SE, P < 0.001). The proportion of local excision for the two periods was highly variable between countries: 4.7% and 11.8% in NL, 3.9% and 7.4% in EW, 4.7% and 4.6% in AZ, 6.0% and 2.9% in SE.

CONCLUSIONS

Application and speed of implementation of MIS were highly variable between countries, but each registry demonstrated a significant increase over time. Local excision revealed inconsistent trends over time.

摘要

目的

近几十年来,直肠癌的手术方法不断发展,引入了微创外科(MIS)技术和局部切除术。由于国际上的实施情况可能存在差异,本研究旨在评估过去 10 年不同国家直肠癌手术方法的趋势,并深入了解患者、肿瘤和治疗特征。

方法

从荷兰(NL)、瑞典(SE)、英格兰-威尔士(EW)和澳大利亚-新西兰(AZ)的临床审计中提取 2010 年至 2019 年间接受直肠癌切除术的患者的伪匿名数据。

结果

共纳入 99597 例患者(38413 例开放性手术、55155 例 MIS 和 5416 例局部切除术)。观察到 MIS 的总体比例从 2010 年的 29.9%增加到 2019 年的 72.1%,同时转换率降低(17.5-9.0%)。2010-2014 年间,各国间 MIS 比例差异很大(NL 为 54.4%,EW 为 45.3%,AZ 为 39.8%,SE 为 14.1%,P<0.001),但随着时间的推移,差异逐渐减少(2015-2019 年 NL 为 78.8%,EW 为 66.3%,AZ 为 64.3%,SE 为 53.2%,P<0.001)。两个时期的局部切除术比例在各国之间差异很大:NL 为 4.7%和 11.8%,EW 为 3.9%和 7.4%,AZ 为 4.7%和 4.6%,SE 为 6.0%和 2.9%。

结论

MIS 的应用和实施速度在各国之间存在很大差异,但每个登记处都显示出随着时间的推移显著增加。局部切除术的趋势随时间变化不一致。

相似文献

1
Evolution of surgical approach to rectal cancer resection: A multinational registry assessment.直肠癌切除术手术方法的演变:一项多国登记评估。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jan 6;39(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04578-4.
2
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.微创与开放直肠切除术治疗直肠癌的结果:基于两国结直肠癌症审核数据的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jun;63(6):778-787. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001654.
3
Influence of Minimally Invasive Resection Technique on Sphincter Preservation and Short-term Outcome in Low Rectal Cancer in the Netherlands.荷兰低位直肠癌微创切除术对肛门括约肌保留和短期疗效的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Dec 1;64(12):1488-1500. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001906.
4
National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes.国家间微创结直肠癌手术实施的差异及其对短期结局的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):5986-6001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08974-1. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.微创直肠癌切除术相较于开放性切除术具有更好的病理和临床结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3435-3448. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07120-2. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
International evaluation of circumferential resection margins after rectal cancer resection: insights from the Swedish and Dutch audits.直肠癌切除术后环周切缘评估的国际评价:来自瑞典和荷兰审计的见解。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Apr;22(4):416-429. doi: 10.1111/codi.14903. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
7
Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).老年直肠癌患者的微创外科手术:一项来自英联邦结直肠肿瘤登记处(BCCA)的分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;46(9):1649-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.224. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
8
Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.腹腔镜、开放和机器人手术治疗直肠癌的肿瘤学和围手术期结果:一项多中心、倾向评分加权队列研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jan;63(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001534.
9
Abdominoperineal excision in Australasia: clinical outcomes, predictive factors and recent trends of nonrestorative rectal cancer surgery.澳大利亚和亚洲地区的腹会阴联合切除术:非修复性直肠癌手术的临床结果、预测因素和近期趋势。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Nov;22(11):1614-1625. doi: 10.1111/codi.15263. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
10
Predictors of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer: A Current Audit of the National Cancer Database.直肠癌环周切缘阳性的预测因素:国家癌症数据库的当前审计。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Sep 1;64(9):1096-1105. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002115.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery: a multicenter cross-sectional study of minimally invasive versus open techniques in Germany.结直肠癌手术的趋势和结果:德国微创与开放技术的多中心横断面研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6338-6346. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11210-1. Epub 2024 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

1
National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes.国家间微创结直肠癌手术实施的差异及其对短期结局的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):5986-6001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08974-1. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
2
Can we Save the rectum by watchful waiting or TransAnal surgery following (chemo)Radiotherapy versus Total mesorectal excision for early REctal Cancer (STAR-TREC)? Protocol for the international, multicentre, rolling phase II/III partially randomized patient preference trial evaluating long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus short-course radiotherapy organ preservation approaches.可否通过观察等待或经肛门手术(放化疗后)来保留直肠,而非行经腹直肠全系膜切除术(TME)治疗早期直肠癌(STAR-TREC)?一项国际性、多中心、滚动二期/三期部分随机患者偏好试验的方案,旨在评估长程同期放化疗与短程放疗器官保留方法。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 May;24(5):639-651. doi: 10.1111/codi.16056. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
3
STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.STROCSS 2021:加强外科学队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究报告规范。
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106165. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
Local Recurrence and Disease-Free Survival After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: Results From the International TaTME Registry.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术后的局部复发和无病生存期:国际经肛门全直肠系膜切除术登记处的结果
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Aug 17;19(11):1232-1240. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7012.
5
Surgical approach for rectal cancer: A network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal TME approaches.直肠癌的手术入路:一项比较开腹、腹腔镜、机器人和经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;47(2):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.037. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
6
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Outcomes Improved After National Training Program (LAPCO) for Specialists in England.英国专家的腹腔镜结直肠手术国家培训计划(LAPCO)后,腹腔镜结直肠手术结果得到改善。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jun 1;275(6):1149-1155. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004584. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
Robotic surgery in colorectal cancer: the way forward or a passing fad.结直肠癌的机器人手术:是前进的方向还是一时的潮流。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Dec;10(6):1222-1228. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2019.04.01.
8
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway.挪威暂停经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):121-130. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11459. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
9
Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.经肛门直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门手术的系统评价与网络荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):59-68. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003227.
10
Evaluation of the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry: an overview of completeness, timeliness, comparability and validity.瑞典结直肠癌登记处评估:完整性、及时性、可比性和有效性概述。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Dec;57(12):1611-1621. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1529425. Epub 2018 Nov 26.