Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; The Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh Division of General Internal Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Pain. 2024 Jun;25(6):104456. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.12.013. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
Low back pain (LBP) significantly affects global health, with associated detrimental outcomes such as physical impairment, emotional distress, and exacerbated mental health symptoms. This study evaluated the representation of marginalized groups, including racialized, gender minority, pregnant/lactating, and elderly individuals in randomized controlled trials for pharmacological interventions treating LBP from 2011 to 2020. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL in December 2021, and 139 studies were eligible. Most trials (n = 113, 81%) reported participant sex; however, no study collected data on sexual and gender minorities, and the majority (n = 99, 71%) excluded pregnant/lactating individuals. Most trials (n = 105, 76%) reported no data on participant race or ethnicity. We limited within-country analyses of race and ethnicity to US-based trials because US-based trials were more likely to report race and/or ethnicity (48%) compared to non-US-based trials (8%). Black participants were the only racialized group whose composition was comparable to US Census estimates. About half (n = 73, 53%) of all trials had an upper age limit for eligibility (range: 40-85 years old) and 24% (n = 33) excluded adults aged >65 years. Our findings confirm that trials for pharmacological LBP interventions underreport demographic data, and the trials that include this data have unrepresentative samples. There is an urgent need for more inclusive and representative patient samples to ensure generalizability and equitable benefits. Standardizing demographic data reporting and integrating community-based participatory research methods can help foster inclusive research practices. This review was registered with prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO), ID 296017. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review investigates patient representation in pharmacological-based clinical trials for low back pain, LBP, the most prevalent pain condition worldwide. Improvements in reporting demographic data and recruiting diverse participant populations-across different racialized, gender and sexual minority, and age groups-will help clinical research generalizability and provide equitable benefits.
下背痛(LBP)严重影响全球健康,会导致身体残疾、情绪困扰和心理健康症状恶化等不良后果。本研究评估了 2011 年至 2020 年间,用于治疗 LBP 的药物干预随机对照试验中边缘化群体(包括种族化、性别少数、孕妇/哺乳期和老年人)的代表性。我们于 2021 年 12 月检索了 Embase、MEDLINE 和 CINAHL,共有 139 项研究符合纳入标准。大多数试验(n=113,81%)报告了参与者的性别;然而,没有研究收集性少数群体和性别少数群体的数据,大多数(n=99,71%)排除了孕妇/哺乳期妇女。大多数试验(n=105,76%)没有报告参与者的种族或民族数据。我们将国家内种族和民族的分析仅限于基于美国的试验,因为与非基于美国的试验相比,基于美国的试验更有可能报告种族和/或民族(48%对 8%)。黑人参与者是唯一种族构成与美国人口普查估计数相当的种族化群体。大约一半(n=73,53%)的所有试验都有资格的年龄上限(范围:40-85 岁),24%(n=33)排除了年龄>65 岁的成年人。我们的研究结果证实,用于药物性 LBP 干预的试验报告的人口统计学数据不足,而包含这些数据的试验样本代表性不足。迫切需要更具包容性和代表性的患者样本,以确保研究的普遍性和公平性受益。标准化人口统计学数据报告和整合基于社区的参与式研究方法可以帮助促进包容性研究实践。本综述在系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)中进行了注册,登记号为 296017。观点:本系统评价调查了全球最常见的疼痛病症——下背痛(LBP)药物治疗临床试验中患者的代表性。改善人口统计学数据报告和招募不同种族、性别和性少数群体以及不同年龄组的多样化患者群体,将有助于临床研究的普遍性并提供公平的收益。