Ramachandran Amrutha, Kuriakose Santhosh, Vimalraj Sajala, Guhan Beena, Chandran Jyoti Ramesh, Vijaykumar Dehannathparambil Kottarathil
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala India.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala India.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;14(4):935-938. doi: 10.1007/s13193-023-01807-8. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
The number of cancer survivors is increasing steadily due to an aging population, continuing improvement in early detection, and treatment. Comparative effectiveness studies and clinical trials are being done to assess late effects of treatment and health-related quality of life. This is in addition to long-term follow-up to assess survival. The aim of the review was to summarize the literature on commonly used quality of life instruments for patients with gynecological cancers with special focus on patient reported outcomes. A literature review was done to summarize the commonly used health-related quality of life instruments in gynecological cancer survivors. Most items assess general quality of life, sexual function, and/or treatment-related toxicity. The commonly reported instruments are the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30) with disease specific modules for cervix, ovary, and endometrium. Another tool is the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) questionnaire with similar disease specific modules. The questionnaires were accessed with permission from these organizations. These instruments typically have about 10-30 questions that assess treatment related bowel and bladder toxicity. This is connected to the patients' self-reported quality of life, generally ranked using a 5-point scale. Length and emphasis vary in different questionnaires. The validated tools in cancer populations allow better quantification and assessment of quality of life. However, there may be limitations. Some of the general instruments may be too broad to assess treatment-related long-term side effects. Others may be too narrow to generalize closely related patient groups. Also, some questions may not be culturally appropriate in certain situations.
由于人口老龄化、早期检测和治疗的持续改善,癌症幸存者的数量正在稳步增加。正在进行比较效果研究和临床试验,以评估治疗的晚期影响和与健康相关的生活质量。这是除了评估生存情况的长期随访之外的工作。本综述的目的是总结关于妇科癌症患者常用生活质量工具的文献,特别关注患者报告的结果。进行了一项文献综述,以总结妇科癌症幸存者常用的与健康相关的生活质量工具。大多数项目评估总体生活质量、性功能和/或与治疗相关的毒性。常用的工具包括欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30(EORTC QLQ C30)以及针对子宫颈、卵巢和子宫内膜的特定疾病模块。另一个工具是癌症治疗功能评估(FACT)问卷,也有类似的特定疾病模块。这些问卷已获得这些组织的许可。这些工具通常有大约10 - 30个问题,用于评估与治疗相关的肠道和膀胱毒性。这与患者自我报告的生活质量相关,通常使用5分制进行排名。不同问卷的长度和重点各不相同。在癌症人群中经过验证的工具能够更好地量化和评估生活质量。然而,可能存在局限性。一些通用工具可能过于宽泛,无法评估与治疗相关的长期副作用。其他工具可能过于狭窄,无法概括密切相关的患者群体。此外,在某些情况下,一些问题可能在文化上不合适。