Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, CYCERON, CHU Caen, COMETE UMR 1075, Caen, France.
Institut des Sciences du Sport, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Suisse.
Chronobiol Int. 2024 Jan;41(1):81-92. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2023.2297960. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
The aim of this study was to validate a French version (FMEQ) of the morningness-eveningness questionnaire (MEQ). Study 1 consisted of a translation by experts and an evaluation. The FMEQ and MEQ were proposed to 19 bilingual participants (age = 38.7 ± 13.7 years). Strong correlations between MEQ and FMEQ were obtained for most items. Study 2 tested the factorial structure and reliability of the FMEQ on a sample of 187 participants (20.46 ± 1.31 years). The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model had a good fit (χ/df = 1.8; SRMR = 0.057) and a good reliability (Cronbach's alphas = 0.8). Concerning the temporal stability (20 participants: 20.48 ± 1.04 years), the Pearson r correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.87 ( < 0.001). Study 3 examined the predictive validity with 42 participants (19.52 ± 2.08 years). The global score of the FMEQ was significantly correlated with the time of peak temperature, wake-up time and bedtime. We did not observe superiority of a three-factors solution of the FMEQ. From now on, French subjects chronotype could be rigorously scored, and results from MEQ and FMEQ could be compared.
这项研究的目的是验证一份法语版(FMEQ)的 Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire(MEQ)。研究 1 由专家翻译和评估组成。FMEQ 和 MEQ 被提供给 19 名双语参与者(年龄=38.7±13.7 岁)。MEQ 和 FMEQ 的大多数项目之间都存在很强的相关性。研究 2 在 187 名参与者(20.46±1.31 岁)的样本中测试了 FMEQ 的因子结构和可靠性。验证性因子分析表明该模型具有良好的拟合度(χ/df=1.8;SRMR=0.057)和良好的可靠性(Cronbach 的 α=0.8)。关于时间稳定性(20 名参与者:20.48±1.04 岁),重测信度的 Pearson r 相关系数为 0.87(<0.001)。研究 3 使用 42 名参与者(19.52±2.08 岁)检验了预测效度。FMEQ 的总分与峰值体温、起床时间和就寝时间显著相关。我们没有观察到 FMEQ 的三因素解决方案具有优越性。从现在开始,法国被试的昼夜节律类型可以被严格评分,并且可以比较 MEQ 和 FMEQ 的结果。