• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Curriculum implementation challenges: Development and validation of an integrated curriculum implementation challenges tool.课程实施挑战:一种综合课程实施挑战工具的开发与验证
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Feb;40(1Part-I):89-94. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.1.7258.
2
Measuring assessment standards in undergraduate medical programs: Development and validation of AIM tool.本科医学课程评估标准的衡量:AIM工具的开发与验证
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Jan-Feb;34(1):164-169. doi: 10.12669/pjms.341.14354.
3
Psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire to evaluate organizational capacity development for faculty development programs.一份用于评估教师发展项目组织能力发展的问卷的心理测量学评估。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Sep 28;9:233. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_292_20. eCollection 2020.
4
Validation Of An Assessment Tool For Professionalism In Medical Students: A Mixed Method Study.医学生职业素养评估工具的验证:混合方法研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2023 Nov;73(11):2177-2182. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.7770.
5
Determining Critical Topics for Undergraduate Surgical Education in Rwanda: Results of a Modified Delphi Process and a Consensus Conference.确定卢旺达本科外科教育的关键主题:改良德尔菲法及共识会议的结果
Cureus. 2023 Aug 17;15(8):e43625. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43625. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Development and validation of questionnaire to assess exposure of children to enteric infections in the rural northwest Ethiopia.评估埃塞俄比亚西北部农村儿童肠道感染暴露情况的问卷的制定和验证。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 25;12(1):6740. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10811-x.
7
Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to measure the perceived implementation of the mission statement of a competency based curriculum.开发和评估了一份问卷,用于测量对基于能力课程的使命宣言的感知实施情况。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Nov 7;12:109. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-109.
8
Development and validation of a new tool to identify factors that influence users' motivation toward the use of teleconsultation systems: A modified Delphi study.一种用于识别影响用户使用远程会诊系统动机因素的新工具的开发与验证:一项改良的德尔菲研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Jan;157:104618. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104618. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
9
Dimensions of challenges in transformation from traditional to integrated modular curriculum - Experiences from Pakistan.从传统课程向综合模块化课程转变中的挑战维度——来自巴基斯坦的经验
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Nov-Dec;39(6):1730-1736. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.6.6730.
10
Content validation of needs assessment survey for remote education initiative in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚远程教育倡议需求评估调查的内容效度
Afr J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;13(4):328-330. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2023.11.004. Epub 2023 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges and opportunities in the implementation of competency-based medical education - A cross-sectional survey among medical faculty in India.基于能力的医学教育实施中的挑战与机遇——印度医学教师的横断面调查
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jun 30;11:206. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1130_21. eCollection 2022.
2
Curriculum development: a how to primer.课程开发:入门指南
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 8;7(2):e000046. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000046. eCollection 2019.
3
A novel approach to the program evaluation committee.一种新颖的方案评估委员会方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Dec 16;19(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1899-x.
4
Healthcare educational leadership in the twenty-first century.二十一世纪的医疗保健教育领导力。
Med Teach. 2019 Jun;41(6):614-618. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1595555. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
5
An approach for developing integrated undergraduate medical curriculum.一种开发综合性本科医学课程的方法。
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Jul-Aug;34(4):804-810. doi: 10.12669/pjms.344.14565.
6
Curriculum reform: Why? What? How? and how will we know it works?课程改革:为何?是什么?如何进行?以及我们如何知晓其成效?
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Jun 7;7(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0221-4.
7
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
8
Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87.为教育研究编制问卷:医学教育促进与发展协会指南第87号
Med Teach. 2014 Jun;36(6):463-74. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.889814. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
9
Problems and issues in implementing innovative curriculum in the developing countries: the Pakistani experience.发展中国家实施创新课程中的问题与挑战:巴基斯坦的经验
BMC Med Educ. 2012 May 16;12:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-31.
10
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.内容效度指数:你确定你知道所报告的内容吗?评论与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.

课程实施挑战:一种综合课程实施挑战工具的开发与验证

Curriculum implementation challenges: Development and validation of an integrated curriculum implementation challenges tool.

作者信息

Aslam Kinza, Khan Rehan Ahmed, Aslam Mohammad Annas, Zaidi Fatima Zia

机构信息

Kinza Aslam, BDS, MMEd, Department of Medical Education, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

Rehan Ahmed Khan, MBBS, FCPS, FRCS, PhD HPE Department of Surgery & Department of Medical Education, Riphah International University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Feb;40(1Part-I):89-94. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.1.7258.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.40.1.7258
PMID:38196468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10772420/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop an instrument to identify the challenges faced by faculty while implementing an integrated curriculum in an undergraduate dentistry program.

METHODS

The study was conducted between September 2020 and October 2021 at the University College of Medicine and Dentistry (UCMD), University of Lahore (UOL). A preliminary questionnaire, developed through literature review and faculty interviews was sent to 10 medical education experts for content validation via the Delphi technique. Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated for individual items (I-CVI) as well as for the composite scale (S-CVI). A panel agreement of more than 75% was considered as the criterion for the inclusion of items in the questionnaire. Cognitive pretesting of five faculty members was conducted and pilot testing was subsequently done with 27 faculty members. The reliability of the tool was determined by Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS

After the Delphi process, the final Integrated Curriculum Implementation Challenges (ICIC) questionnaire had 42 items. S-CVI was 0.87 and the cut-off value for I-CVI was taken as 0.78 as the criterion for item deletion. Cognitive interviews and pretesting revealed good item interpretation. Cronbach's alpha for this tool was 0.87.

CONCLUSION

ICIC is a useful instrument with good reliability and content validity. It can be used to identify the presence and extent of challenges faced by the faculty while implementing an integrated curriculum.

摘要

目的

开发一种工具,以识别牙科本科专业实施整合课程时教师所面临的挑战。

方法

该研究于2020年9月至2021年10月在拉合尔大学医学院和牙科学院(UCMD)进行。通过文献综述和教师访谈编制的初步问卷,通过德尔菲技术发送给10位医学教育专家进行内容效度验证。计算各个项目的内容效度指数(I-CVI)以及综合量表的内容效度指数(S-CVI)。超过75%的专家小组共识被视为问卷项目纳入的标准。对5名教师进行了认知预测试,随后对27名教师进行了试点测试。该工具的信度由克朗巴赫α系数确定。

结果

经过德尔菲过程,最终的整合课程实施挑战(ICIC)问卷有42个项目。S-CVI为0.87,I-CVI的截止值定为0.78作为项目删除的标准。认知访谈和预测试显示项目解释良好。该工具的克朗巴赫α系数为0.87。

结论

ICIC是一种具有良好信度和内容效度的有用工具。它可用于识别教师在实施整合课程时所面临挑战的存在情况和程度。