• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Older Adults' and Family Caregivers' Technological Arrangements on Risk of Institutionalization.老年人及家庭照顾者针对机构化风险的技术安排
Work Aging Retire. 2023 Mar 21;10(1):51-56. doi: 10.1093/workar/waad005. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Family Caregivers' Experiences With Health Care Workers in the Care of Older Adults With Activity Limitations.家庭照顾者在照顾活动受限的老年人方面与医护人员的经历。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919866. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19866.
3
A Care Paradox: The Relationship Between Older Adults' Caregiving Arrangements and Institutionalization and Mortality.一个关怀悖论:老年人的照顾安排与机构化和死亡率之间的关系。
Res Aging. 2024 Aug-Sep;46(7-8):363-385. doi: 10.1177/01640275241229416. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
4
Correlates of caregivers' involvement in the management of older adults' medications.照顾者参与老年人药物管理的相关因素。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Jul-Aug;13(4):840-848. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
5
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
6
Caregivers' Role in In-Home Video Telehealth: National Survey of Occupational Therapy Practitioners.家庭视频远程医疗中护理人员的角色:职业治疗从业者全国调查。
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Mar 14;11:e52049. doi: 10.2196/52049.
7
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
Family Caregiver Factors Associated with Unmet Needs for Care of Older Adults.与老年人护理需求未得到满足相关的家庭照顾者因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Mar;65(3):560-566. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14547. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
Use of provider-sponsored patient portals among older adults and their family caregivers.老年人及其家庭照顾者使用医疗机构赞助的患者门户。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Apr;71(4):1177-1187. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18187. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
10
Internet use among older adults: association with health needs, psychological capital, and social capital.老年人的互联网使用:与健康需求、心理资本和社会资本的关联
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 16;15(5):e97. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2333.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of technology use and cognitive aging.技术使用与认知衰老的荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02159-9.
2
Empowering the Care of Older Adults Through the Use of Technology.通过技术应用增强对老年人的护理。
Work Aging Retire. 2023 Dec 19;10(1):1-5. doi: 10.1093/workar/waad030. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Internet Use and Cognitive Functioning in Later Life: Focus on Asymmetric Effects and Contextual Factors.互联网使用与晚年认知功能:关注非对称效应和情境因素。
Gerontologist. 2022 Mar 28;62(3):425-435. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab149.
2
Health-Related Difficulty in Internet Use Among Older Adults: Correlates and Mediation of Its Association With Quality of Life Through Social Support Networks.老年人互联网使用相关困难:与生活质量的关联及其通过社会支持网络的中介作用的相关因素分析。
Gerontologist. 2021 Jul 13;61(5):693-702. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa096.
3
A Double Burden of Exclusion? Digital and Social Exclusion of Older Adults in Times of COVID-19.双重排斥困境?COVID-19 时代老年群体的数字和社会排斥
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Feb 17;76(3):e99-e103. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa098.
4
When Going Digital Becomes a Necessity: Ensuring Older Adults' Needs for Information, Services, and Social Inclusion During COVID-19.当数字化成为必需品:在 COVID-19 期间确保老年人对信息、服务和社会包容的需求。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):460-470. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1771237. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
5
Technology and Caregiving: Emerging Interventions and Directions for Research.技术与照护:新兴干预措施及研究方向。
Gerontologist. 2020 Feb 14;60(Suppl 1):S41-S49. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz178.
6
Health Information-Seeking Behaviors of Family Caregivers: Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.家庭照顾者的健康信息寻求行为:健康信息国家趋势调查分析
JMIR Aging. 2019 Jan 14;2(1):e11237. doi: 10.2196/11237.
7
Informal Caregivers' Use of Internet-Based Health Resources: An Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.非正式护理人员对基于互联网的健康资源的使用:健康信息国家趋势调查分析
JMIR Aging. 2018 Dec 18;1(2):e11051. doi: 10.2196/11051.
8
Cohort Profile: The National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS).队列简介:美国国家健康与老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;48(4):1044-1045g. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz109.
9
The Digital Divide in Health-Related Technology Use: The Significance of Race/Ethnicity.健康相关技术使用中的数字鸿沟:种族/民族的重要性。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):6-14. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny138.
10
Longitudinal Analysis of the Relationship Between Purposes of Internet Use and Well-being Among Older Adults.老年人互联网使用目的与幸福感的纵向关系分析。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):58-68. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny036.

老年人及家庭照顾者针对机构化风险的技术安排

Older Adults' and Family Caregivers' Technological Arrangements on Risk of Institutionalization.

作者信息

Kim Yijung K, Ang Shannon, Fingerman Karen L

机构信息

Texas Aging & Longevity Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Work Aging Retire. 2023 Mar 21;10(1):51-56. doi: 10.1093/workar/waad005. eCollection 2024 Jan.

DOI:10.1093/workar/waad005
PMID:38196826
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10772965/
Abstract

Internet-enabled resources could facilitate older adults' ability to live in the community longer, but studies have often overlooked how family caregivers utilize the internet to assist older care recipients. We examined whether different family-level arrangements of internet use may affect the risk of institutionalization among older adults. Using the National Health and Aging Trends Study (2015-2020) and National Study on Caregiving (2015), we estimated multinominal logistic regression and inverse-probability weighted Cox proportional hazard models to investigate the determinants of technological arrangements in 2015 (i.e., no internet use, only caregiver use, only care recipient use, both caregiver and care recipient internet use) and how they may affect the risk of moving to an assisted living or nursing facility between 2015 and 2020. The most prevalent technological arrangement in 2015 was the one where neither the care recipient nor their caregiver reported using the internet. Relatively disadvantaged older care recipients (e.g., people of color, fewer years of education, less income, worse cognitive functioning) and caregivers (e.g., older, fewer years of education) were more likely to be in a non-internet use arrangement. Compared to older adults in other categories, older adults who were internet users and had a family caregiver who also used the internet in their caregiving tasks had a much lower risk of relocation during the study period. Findings suggest that digital interventions aimed at serving the older adult population should assess the gap in access and utilization at a family level and consider the role of older adults' social partners.

摘要

具备互联网功能的资源有助于老年人更长时间地在社区生活,但研究往往忽视了家庭照顾者如何利用互联网来帮助老年受照顾者。我们研究了不同的家庭层面互联网使用安排是否可能影响老年人入住机构的风险。利用《国家健康与老龄化趋势研究》(2015 - 2020年)和《国家护理研究》(2015年),我们估计了多项逻辑回归模型和逆概率加权Cox比例风险模型,以研究2015年技术安排的决定因素(即不使用互联网、仅照顾者使用、仅受照顾者使用、照顾者和受照顾者都使用互联网),以及这些安排如何可能影响2015年至2020年期间入住辅助生活设施或养老院的风险。2015年最普遍的技术安排是受照顾者及其照顾者都未报告使用互联网的情况。相对弱势的老年受照顾者(例如有色人种、受教育年限较少、收入较低、认知功能较差)和照顾者(例如年龄较大、受教育年限较少)更有可能处于不使用互联网的安排中。与其他类别的老年人相比,在研究期间,使用互联网且其家庭照顾者在照顾任务中也使用互联网的老年人搬迁风险要低得多。研究结果表明,旨在服务老年人群体的数字干预措施应评估家庭层面在获取和使用方面的差距,并考虑老年人社会伙伴的作用。