• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术与照护:新兴干预措施及研究方向。

Technology and Caregiving: Emerging Interventions and Directions for Research.

机构信息

Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society (CITRIS) and the Banatao Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California.

Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California, Davis, CA.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2020 Feb 14;60(Suppl 1):S41-S49. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz178.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnz178
PMID:32057082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7019659/
Abstract

An array of technology-based interventions has increasingly become available to support family caregivers, primarily focusing on health and well-being, social isolation, financial, and psychological support. More recently the emergence of new technologies such as mobile and cloud, robotics, connected sensors, virtual/augmented/mixed reality, voice, and the evermore ubiquitous tools supported by advanced data analytics, coupled with the integration of multiple technologies through platform solutions, have opened a new era of technology-enabled interventions that can empower and support family caregivers. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for identifying and addressing the challenges that may need to be overcome to effectively apply technology-enabled solutions for family caregivers. The paper identifies a number of challenges that either moderate or mediate the full use of technologies for the benefit of caregivers. The challenges include issues related to equity, inclusion, and access; ethical concerns related to privacy and security; political and regulatory factors affecting interoperability and lack of standards; inclusive/human-centric design and issues; and inherent economic and distribution channel difficulties. The paper concludes with a summary of research questions and issues that form a framework for global research priorities.

摘要

一系列基于技术的干预措施已经越来越多地被用于支持家庭护理人员,主要侧重于健康和福祉、社会隔离、经济和心理支持。最近,新的技术如移动和云、机器人技术、互联传感器、虚拟/增强/混合现实、语音以及越来越多的先进数据分析支持的工具的出现,加上通过平台解决方案整合多种技术,开创了一个新的技术赋能干预时代,可以为家庭护理人员提供赋权和支持。本文提出了一个概念框架,用于识别和解决可能需要克服的挑战,以有效地为家庭护理人员应用技术赋能解决方案。本文确定了一些挑战,这些挑战要么调节,要么在一定程度上影响技术的充分利用,以造福护理人员。这些挑战包括与公平性、包容性和可及性相关的问题;与隐私和安全相关的伦理问题;影响互操作性和缺乏标准的政治和监管因素;包容性/以人为本的设计和问题;以及固有的经济和分销渠道困难。本文最后总结了形成全球研究重点框架的研究问题和议题。

相似文献

1
Technology and Caregiving: Emerging Interventions and Directions for Research.技术与照护:新兴干预措施及研究方向。
Gerontologist. 2020 Feb 14;60(Suppl 1):S41-S49. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz178.
2
REVISITING HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ETHICAL, LEGAL, and SOCIAL ISSUES and EVALUATION: TELEHEALTH/TELEMEDICINE and COVID-19.重新审视健康信息技术的伦理、法律和社会问题及评估:远程医疗/远程医学和 COVID-19。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Nov;143:104239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104239. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
3
DEDICATE: proposal for a conceptual framework to develop dementia-friendly integrated eCare support.奉献:开发面向痴呆症的综合电子关怀支持的概念框架建议。
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 Sep 12;17(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12938-018-0552-y.
4
Stakeholder's experiences of living and caring in technology-rich supported living environments for tenants living with dementia.利益相关者在为患有痴呆症的租户提供的技术丰富的支持性居住环境中的生活和护理体验。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Feb 1;23(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03751-2.
5
Supporting Caregivers of Patients With Cancer: A Summary of Technology-Mediated Interventions and Future Directions.支持癌症患者的护理人员:技术介导干预措施及未来方向综述
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:838-849. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_201397.
6
Technology-Based Interventions to Address Social Isolation and Loneliness Among Informal Dementia Caregivers: A Scoping Review.基于技术的干预措施,以解决非正式痴呆症照顾者的社会隔离和孤独感:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Nov;24(11):1700-1707. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.08.005. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
7
Computer mediated reality technologies: A conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art in healthcare intervention systems.计算机介导现实技术:医疗干预系统的概念框架与技术现状综述
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Feb;90:103102. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103102. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
8
Social isolation in community-dwelling seniors: an evidence-based analysis.社区居住老年人的社会隔离:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(5):1-49. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
9
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
10
Challenges and Recommendations for the Deployment of Information and Communication Technology Solutions for Informal Caregivers: Scoping Review.为非正式护理人员部署信息通信技术解决方案的挑战与建议:范围综述
JMIR Aging. 2020 Jul 29;3(2):e20310. doi: 10.2196/20310.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mobile App (CareFit) Supporting Physical Activity for Informal Carers of People With Dementia: Mixed Methods Feasibility and Adaptation Study.一款支持痴呆症患者非正式照料者进行体育活动的移动应用程序(CareFit):混合方法可行性与适应性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 29;27:e56739. doi: 10.2196/56739.
2
A Qualitative Study Examining Caregivers' Perspectives on Healthcare System Barriers and Facilitators to Foregut Cancer Care.一项定性研究:探究护理人员对前肠癌症护理中医疗系统障碍与促进因素的看法。
J Surg Res. 2025 Jul 30;314:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.06.071.
3
Acceptability of an Intervention to Prevent Older Adult Mistreatment Among Family Caregivers to Persons With Dementia: Multimethod Pilot Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Priorities in Family Caregiving: Process and Outcomes of a Conference on Family-Centered Care Across the Trajectory of Serious Illness.家庭护理研究重点:一场关于贯穿严重疾病轨迹的以家庭为中心的护理的会议的过程和结果。
Gerontologist. 2020 Feb 14;60(Suppl 1):S5-S13. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz138.
2
Needs and preferences for technology among Chinese family caregivers of persons with dementia: A pilot study.中国痴呆症患者家庭照顾者对技术的需求与偏好:一项试点研究。
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2018 Jul 13;5:2055668318775315. doi: 10.1177/2055668318775315. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
3
Mobile Phones May Not Bridge the Digital Divide: A Look at Mobile Phone Literacy in an Underserved Patient Population.
一项针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者预防老年人虐待的干预措施的可接受性:多方法试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 30;9:e73778. doi: 10.2196/73778.
4
Dentists' perception and use of AI and robotics in the care of persons with disabilities.牙医对人工智能和机器人技术在残疾人护理中的认知与应用
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27551. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10988-x.
5
Perceived technology usefulness for caregiving among unpaid caregivers: a National Cross-Sectional Study.无偿照料者对护理技术的感知有用性:一项全国横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 14;13:1578701. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1578701. eCollection 2025.
6
Trends and Shifts in Swedish Telemedicine Consultations During the Pre-COVID-19, COVID-19, and Post-COVID-19 Periods: Retrospective Observational Study.瑞典在新冠疫情前、疫情期间和疫情后远程医疗咨询的趋势与变化:回顾性观察研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 16;9:e60294. doi: 10.2196/60294.
7
Stakeholders and Contextual Factors in the Implementation of Assistive Robotic Arms for Persons With Tetraplegia: Deductive Content Analysis of Focus Group Interviews.四肢瘫痪者辅助机器人手臂实施中的利益相关者和背景因素:焦点小组访谈的演绎性内容分析
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 May 16;12:e65759. doi: 10.2196/65759.
8
Factors related to social disconnectedness among older unpaid caregivers.老年无薪照料者中与社会脱节相关的因素。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 29;13:1589103. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1589103. eCollection 2025.
9
Caregiver Support Program May Decrease Work-Family Conflict: An Intervention Study.照顾者支持项目可能会减少工作-家庭冲突:一项干预研究。
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251332766. doi: 10.1177/00469580251332766. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
10
Co-creation and evaluation of online care maps for children with medical complexity.为患有复杂疾病的儿童共同创建和评估在线护理地图。
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05679-5.
手机可能无法弥合数字鸿沟:对服务不足患者群体手机素养的审视。
Cureus. 2019 Feb 20;11(2):e4104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4104.
4
Exploring Privilege in the Digital Divide: Implications for Theory, Policy, and Practice.探索数字鸿沟中的特权:对理论、政策和实践的启示。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):e1-e15. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny037.
5
Older Adults' Internet Use for Health Information: Digital Divide by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status.老年人对互联网健康信息的使用:按种族/民族和社会经济地位划分的数字鸿沟。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Jan;39(1):105-110. doi: 10.1177/0733464818770772. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
6
Smart Homes for Elderly Healthcare-Recent Advances and Research Challenges.智能家庭在老年医疗保健中的应用——最新进展与研究挑战。
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Oct 31;17(11):2496. doi: 10.3390/s17112496.
7
Pilot testing a digital pet avatar for older adults.针对老年人进行数字宠物化身的试点测试。
Geriatr Nurs. 2017 Nov-Dec;38(6):542-547. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 May 4.
8
Social Health Inequalities and eHealth: A Literature Review With Qualitative Synthesis of Theoretical and Empirical Studies.社会健康不平等与电子健康:一项对理论和实证研究进行定性综合的文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 27;19(4):e136. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6731.
9
Engaging older adults in the visualization of sensor data facilitated by an open platform for connected devices.通过一个用于连接设备的开放平台,促使老年人参与传感器数据可视化。
Technol Health Care. 2016 Mar 11;24(4):541-50. doi: 10.3233/THC-161150.
10
Personalized Telehealth in the Future: A Global Research Agenda.未来的个性化远程医疗:一项全球研究议程。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 1;18(3):e53. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5257.