• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于患者安全模型的系统工程倡议,护士对改善感染预防与控制行为干预措施的偏好:一项离散选择实验

Nurses' preferences for interventions to improve infection prevention and control behaviors based on systems engineering initiative to patient safety model: a discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Zhou Qian, Liu Junjie, Zheng Feiyang, Wang Qianning, Zhang Xinping, Li Hui, Tan Li, Luo Wanjun

机构信息

Department of Hospital Infection Management, Wuhan Children's Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , No.100 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2024 Jan 10;23(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01701-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-01701-w
PMID:38200529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10777601/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evidence of preferences for infection prevention and control (IPC) intervention from system perspective was lacked. This study aimed to elicit nurses' preferences for the intervention designed to improve IPC behaviors based on the Systems Engineering Initiative to Patient Safety (SEIPS) model using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE).

METHODS

A DCE was conducted among nurses who were on active duty and willing to participate from July 5th to 10th, 2021 in a tertiary hospital in Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, using convenience sampling. A self-administered questionnaire included scenarios formed by six attributes with varying levels based on SEIPS model: person, organization, tools and technology, tasks, internal environment and external environment. A conditional logit and latent class logit model were performed to analyze the data.

RESULTS

A total of 257 valid questionnaires were analyzed among nurses. The results from the latent class logit model show that nurses' preferences can be divided into three classes. For nurses in multifaceted-aspect-preferred class (41.9%), positive coefficients were obtained in those six attributes. For person-preferred class (19.7%), only person was positively significant. For environment-preferred class (36.4%), the most important attribute were tasks, tools and technology, internal environment and external environment.

CONCLUSIONS

This finding suggest that nurses have three latent-class preferences for interventions. Multifaceted interventions to improve IPC behaviors based on the SEIPS model are preferred by most nurses. Moreover, relevant measured should be performed targeted the latent class of person-preferred and external-environment-preferred nurses.

摘要

背景

从系统角度来看,缺乏关于感染预防与控制(IPC)干预偏好的证据。本研究旨在运用离散选择实验(DCE),基于患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS)模型,引出护士对旨在改善IPC行为的干预措施的偏好。

方法

2021年7月5日至10日,在江西省赣州市一家三级医院,采用便利抽样法,对在职且愿意参与的护士进行了DCE。一份自填式问卷包含基于SEIPS模型由六个具有不同水平的属性构成的情景:人员、组织、工具与技术、任务、内部环境和外部环境。运用条件logit模型和潜在类别logit模型对数据进行分析。

结果

共分析了257份护士有效问卷。潜在类别logit模型的结果显示,护士的偏好可分为三类。对于多方面偏好类护士(41.9%),这六个属性均获得正系数。对于人员偏好类护士(19.7%),只有人员属性具有显著正相关。对于环境偏好类护士(36.4%),最重要的属性是任务、工具与技术、内部环境和外部环境。

结论

这一发现表明护士对干预措施有三种潜在类别偏好。大多数护士更倾向于基于SEIPS模型的改善IPC行为的多方面干预措施。此外,应针对人员偏好类和外部环境偏好类护士这两个潜在类别采取相关措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bddb/10777601/8ed4050f0baa/12912_2024_1701_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bddb/10777601/8ed4050f0baa/12912_2024_1701_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bddb/10777601/8ed4050f0baa/12912_2024_1701_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Nurses' preferences for interventions to improve infection prevention and control behaviors based on systems engineering initiative to patient safety model: a discrete choice experiment.基于患者安全模型的系统工程倡议,护士对改善感染预防与控制行为干预措施的偏好:一项离散选择实验
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jan 10;23(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01701-w.
2
Patients' Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Applications Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in China: Discrete Choice Experiment.中国 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,患者对人工智能应用与临床医生在疾病诊断中的偏好:离散选择实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 23;23(2):e22841. doi: 10.2196/22841.
3
Optimizing the Practice Environment for Medical Staff in the Post-pandemic Era: A Discrete Choice Experiment.优化后疫情时代医务人员的执业环境:离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 18;10:911868. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.911868. eCollection 2022.
4
Infection prevention and control in CT Part 2: Radiographers' and radiology nurses' perceptions of high-risk scenarios contributing to non-adherence to IPC protocols.CT中的感染预防与控制 第2部分:放射技师和放射科护士对导致不遵守感染预防与控制协议的高风险场景的看法。
Radiography (Lond). 2024 Jan;30(1):265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.11.014. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
5
Nurses' job preferences on the internet plus nursing service program: a discrete choice experiment.护士对互联网+护理服务项目的工作偏好:一项离散选择实验
BMC Nurs. 2024 Feb 15;23(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01692-0.
6
COPD-treating nurses' preferences for inhaler attributes - a discrete choice experiment.慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗护士对吸入器属性的偏好——一项离散选择实验
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jan;33(1):71-75. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1238353. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
7
Public Preference Heterogeneity and Predicted Uptake Rate of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening Programs in Rural China: Discrete Choice Experiments and Latent Class Analysis.公众偏好异质性与中国农村上消化道癌筛查项目的预期参与率:离散选择实验和潜在类别分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jul 10;9:e42898. doi: 10.2196/42898.
8
Should I stay or should I go home? A latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment on hospital-at-home.我是留还是回家?居家住院的离散选择实验的潜在类别分析。
Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):588-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
9
Heterogeneous Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Germany: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.德国结直肠癌筛查的异质性偏好:一项离散选择实验的结果
Value Health. 2023 Jan;26(1):104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.07.012. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
10
Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Clinicians Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Discrete Choice Experiment and Propensity Score Matching Study.人工智能临床医生在 COVID-19 大流行前后的偏好:离散选择实验和倾向评分匹配研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 2;23(3):e26997. doi: 10.2196/26997.

本文引用的文献

1
Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.当前健康相关离散选择实验中偏好异质性会计的实践:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Oct;40(10):943-956. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01178-y. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of disease burden of healthcare-associated infections in China: an economic burden perspective from general hospitals.一项针对中国医疗保健相关性感染疾病负担的系统评价和荟萃分析:从综合医院的经济负担角度。
J Hosp Infect. 2022 May;123:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
3
What are healthcare workers' preferences for hand hygiene interventions? A discrete choice experiment.
医护人员对手卫生干预措施有哪些偏好?一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 3;11(11):e052195. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052195.
4
Identification of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Health Information Technology by Nurses Who Are Digitally Lagging: In-Depth Interview Study.识别影响数字化落后护士采用健康信息技术的因素:深度访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 14;22(8):e15630. doi: 10.2196/15630.
5
Ways in which healthcare interior environments are associated with perceived safety against infectious diseases and coping behaviours.医疗保健内部环境与对传染病的感知安全性及应对行为相关联的方式。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Sep;106(1):107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.06.022. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
6
Will healthcare workers improve infection prevention and control behaviors as COVID-19 risk emerges and increases, in China?医护人员在中国 COVID-19 风险出现和增加时,会改善感染预防和控制行为吗?
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jun 11;9(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00746-1.
7
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.物理隔离、口罩和眼部防护预防 SARS-CoV-2 和 COVID-19 的人际传播:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1973-1987. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
8
Trajectories of hospital infection control: Using non-representational theory to understand and improve infection prevention and control.医院感染控制的轨迹:运用非表象理论理解和改善感染预防与控制。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jul;256:113023. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113023. Epub 2020 May 5.
9
Characteristics of Health Care Personnel with COVID-19 - United States, February 12-April 9, 2020.2020 年 2 月 12 日-4 月 9 日美国 COVID-19 患者医护人员特征。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):477-481. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e6.
10
SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.SEIPS 3.0:以患者安全为中心的患者就医流程的人因工程设计。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. Epub 2020 Jan 10.