Costa P T, Busch C M, Zonderman A B, McCrae R R
J Pers Assess. 1986 Winter;50(4):640-50. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5004_10.
Two recent item factor analyses of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) classified the resulting factors according to a conceptual scheme offered by Norman's (1963) five factor model. The present article empirically evaluates those classifications by correlating MMPI factor scales with self-report and peer rating measures of the five factor model in a sample of 153 adult men and women. Both sets of predictions were generally supported, although MMPI factors derived in a normal sample showed closer correspondences with the five normal personality dimensions. MMPI factor scales were also correlated with 18 scales measuring specific traits within the broader domains of Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Openness. The nine Costa, Zonderman, McCrae, and Williams (1985) MMPI factor scales appear to give useful global assessments of four of the five factors; other instruments are needed to provide detailed information on more specific aspects of normal personality. The use of the five factor model in routine clinical assessment is discussed.
最近对明尼苏达多相人格量表（MMPI）进行的两项项目因素分析，根据诺曼（1963）的五因素模型所提供的概念框架对得出的因素进行了分类。本文通过在153名成年男性和女性样本中，将MMPI因素量表与五因素模型的自我报告和同伴评定测量进行关联，对这些分类进行了实证评估。尽管在正常样本中得出的MMPI因素与五个正常人格维度显示出更紧密的对应关系，但两组预测总体上都得到了支持。MMPI因素量表还与18个量表相关，这些量表测量神经质、外向性和开放性更广泛领域内的特定特质。科斯塔、宗德曼、麦克雷和威廉姆斯（1985）的九个MMPI因素量表似乎对五个因素中的四个给出了有用的总体评估；需要其他工具来提供关于正常人格更具体方面的详细信息。文中还讨论了五因素模型在常规临床评估中的应用。
