Martinot Martin, Mohseni-Zadeh Mahsa, Gravier Simon, Ion Ciprian, Eyriey Magali, Beigue Severine, Coutan Christophe, Ongagna Jean-Claude, Henric Anais, Schieber Anne, Jochault Loic, Kempf Christian
Infectious Diseases Department, Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar, 68000 Colmar, France.
Clinical Research Department, Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar, 68000 Colmar, France.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 25;12(1):46. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010046.
Nosocomial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major airborne health threat for inpatients. Architecture and ventilation are key elements to prevent nosocomial COVID-19 (NC), but real-life data are challenging to collect. We aimed to retrospectively assess the impact of the type of ventilation and the ratio of single/double rooms on the risk of NC (acquisition of COVID-19 at least 48 h after admission). This study was conducted in a tertiary hospital composed of two main structures (one historical and one modern), which were the sites of acquisition of NC: historical (H) (natural ventilation, 53% single rooms) or modern (M) hospital (double-flow mechanical ventilation, 91% single rooms). During the study period (1 October 2020 to 31 May 2021), 1020 patients presented with COVID-19, with 150 (14.7%) of them being NC (median delay of acquisition, 12 days). As compared with non-nosocomial cases, the patients with NC were older (79 years vs. 72 years; < 0.001) and exhibited higher mortality risk (32.7% vs. 14.1%; < 0.001). Among the 150 NC cases, 99.3% were diagnosed in H, mainly in four medical departments. A total of 73 cases were diagnosed in single rooms versus 77 in double rooms, including 26 secondary cases. Measured air changes per hour were lower in H than in M. We hypothesized that in H, SARS-CoV-2 transmission was favored by short-range transmission within a high ratio of double rooms, but also during clusters, via far-afield transmission through virus-laden aerosols favored by low air changes per hour. A better knowledge of the mechanism of airborne risk in healthcare establishments should lead to the implementation of corrective measures when necessary. People's health is improved using not only personal but also collective protective equipment, i.e., ventilation and architecture, thereby reinforcing the need to change institutional and professional practices.
医院获得性新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)是住院患者面临的主要空气传播健康威胁。建筑结构和通风是预防医院获得性COVID-19(NC)的关键因素,但实际数据收集具有挑战性。我们旨在回顾性评估通风类型和单人间/双人间比例对NC风险(入院至少48小时后感染COVID-19)的影响。本研究在一家三级医院进行,该医院由两个主要建筑(一个历史建筑和一个现代建筑)组成,这两个建筑均为NC感染地点:历史建筑(H)(自然通风,53%为单人间)或现代建筑(M)医院(双向机械通风,91%为单人间)。在研究期间(2020年10月1日至2021年5月31日),1020例患者确诊为COVID-19,其中150例(14.7%)为NC(感染中位延迟时间为12天)。与非医院获得性病例相比,NC患者年龄更大(79岁对72岁;<0.001),且死亡风险更高(32.7%对14.1%;<0.001)。在150例NC病例中,99.3%在H建筑中被诊断,主要集中在四个医疗科室。单人间诊断出73例,双人间诊断出77例,包括26例二代病例。H建筑每小时的换气次数低于M建筑。我们推测,在H建筑中,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的传播因高比例双人间内的短程传播而加剧,但在聚集性感染期间,也会通过每小时换气次数低而有利于携带病毒气溶胶的远距离传播。更好地了解医疗机构中空气传播风险的机制应能在必要时促使采取纠正措施。不仅通过个人防护设备,还通过集体防护设备,即通风和建筑结构来改善人们的健康,从而强化改变机构和专业做法的必要性。