Brubaker C E
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1986 Oct;23(4):19-26.
Clearly, all considerations for wheelchair performance and their applicability to optimization of mobility are related to user position relative to the main wheel axis. It is also obvious that wheelchair performance is enhanced by a center of gravity position rearward of that which is characteristic of the generic wheelchair. The only obvious features of the generic wheelchair are excessive static stability and limitation of body motion. Perhaps at this stage the reader may be ready to accept some of the arguments presented above, but have reservations about prescribing a less stable wheelchair for the more severely disabled (e.g., quadraplegics). Consider that the reduction of rolling resistance, decrease in downhill turning tendancy, and required turning force would likely be even more important to the user with marginal physical capacity. This would appear as an attractive trade for reduction in static stability. The number of factors unfavorably affected by increased static stability would suggest the use of an anti-tipping device rather than designed static stability if this is thought to be an important consideration.
显然,所有关于轮椅性能及其对优化移动性适用性的考量都与使用者相对于主轮轴的位置有关。同样明显的是,当重心位置处于普通轮椅特征位置后方时,轮椅性能会得到提升。普通轮椅唯一明显的特点是过度的静态稳定性和身体运动受限。也许在此阶段,读者可能准备好接受上述一些观点,但对于为重度残疾者(如四肢瘫痪者)开具稳定性较低的轮椅会有所保留。要考虑到,对于身体能力有限的使用者而言,降低滚动阻力、减少下坡转弯倾向以及所需的转向力可能更为重要。这对于降低静态稳定性来说似乎是一个有吸引力的权衡。如果认为这是一个重要考量因素,那么受静态稳定性增加不利影响的因素数量会表明应使用防倾翻装置而非设计的静态稳定性。