Bakatchina Sadate, Weissland Thierry, Brassart Florian, Alberca Ilona, Vigie Opale, Pradon Didier, Faupin Arnaud
Laboratory Physical Activity Impact on Health (IAPS), University of Toulon, Toulon, France.
Laboratory of Material to System Integration (IMS), University of Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Jun 3;4:861592. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.861592. eCollection 2022.
In wheelchair rugby, players use either an offensive or defensive wheelchair depending on their field position and level of impairment. Performance of wheelchair rugby players is related to several parameters, however it is currently unclear if differences in performance are related to wheelchair type or no: the effect of wheelchair type on performance variables has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare offensive and defensive wheelchairs on performance variables during a straight-line sprint.
Thirteen able-bodied people performed two 20 m sprint trials: one with an offensive and one with a defensive wheelchair. Data were collected using inertial measurement units fixed on the wheelchair. Peak wheelchair velocities and left-right asymmetries in peak wheel velocities were measured during the acceleration and constant peak velocity phases. Sprint time, cycle frequency, and mean and maximum velocity were calculated over the entire sprint.
The peak velocities of the first 2 pushes (acceleration phase) were significantly higher with the defensive than the offensive wheelchair ( < 0.04 and < 0.02). Mean and maximum sprint velocity were significantly higher ( < 0.03 and < 0.04, respectively) with the defensive wheelchair. Cycle frequency and asymmetry did not differ between wheelchairs.
Performance was higher with the defensive than the offensive wheelchair, suggesting that the frequent finding that the higher performance of offensive as compared to defensive players is not related to the use of an offensive wheelchair.
在轮椅橄榄球运动中,运动员根据其场上位置和损伤程度使用进攻型或防守型轮椅。轮椅橄榄球运动员的表现与多个参数相关,然而目前尚不清楚表现差异是否与轮椅类型有关:轮椅类型对表现变量的影响尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是比较直线冲刺过程中进攻型和防守型轮椅在表现变量方面的差异。
13名身体健全的人进行了两次20米冲刺试验:一次使用进攻型轮椅,一次使用防守型轮椅。使用固定在轮椅上的惯性测量单元收集数据。在加速阶段和恒定峰值速度阶段测量轮椅的峰值速度以及峰值轮速的左右不对称性。计算整个冲刺过程中的冲刺时间、周期频率以及平均速度和最大速度。
在前两次推动(加速阶段)中,防守型轮椅的峰值速度显著高于进攻型轮椅(分别为<0.04和<0.02)。防守型轮椅的平均冲刺速度和最大冲刺速度显著更高(分别为<0.03和<0.04)。轮椅之间的周期频率和不对称性没有差异。
防守型轮椅的表现高于进攻型轮椅,这表明与防守型运动员相比,进攻型运动员表现更高这一常见发现与进攻型轮椅的使用无关。