Kjerrumgaard Amalie, Hvedstrup Jeppe, Carlsen Louise Ninett, Dyre Kristine, Schytz Henrik
Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark.
Center for IT and Medical Technology, Department Patient at Home, Team Prevention and Outpatient Treatment, The Capital Region of Denmark, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 22;14(1):21. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010021.
Headache calendars are essential tools in monitoring changes in headache frequency and type. They are used in clinical practice for long-term monitoring, but their validation remains limited. The aim of this study was to validate the use of a digital calendar in monitoring single migraine and tension-type headache attacks.
From July 2022 to February 2023, patients diagnosed with migraine and tension-type headache were enrolled. The validation of the digital calendar involved the comparison of self-reported single headache attacks in the digital calendar with the diagnostic headache diary based on the ICHD-3 criteria for migraine and tension-type headache. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to assess reliability, and the level of agreement was calculated using kappa statistics.
This study included 30 patients (87% women) diagnosed with migraine and tension-type headache. The level of agreement in the classification of a single migraine attack revealed a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 78%, representing a substantial level of agreement (κ = 0.60). The classification of a single tension-type headache attack revealed a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 72%, with a moderate level of agreement (κ = 0.54).
The digital calendar proves effective in monitoring single headache attacks in patients with migraine and tension-type headache. In clinical practice, we recommend using the digital calendar as a monitoring tool for headache patients, as they can accurately identify true migraine and tension-type headache days.
头痛日历是监测头痛频率和类型变化的重要工具。它们在临床实践中用于长期监测,但其验证仍然有限。本研究的目的是验证数字日历在监测单次偏头痛和紧张型头痛发作中的应用。
2022年7月至2023年2月,招募了被诊断为偏头痛和紧张型头痛的患者。数字日历的验证包括将数字日历中自我报告的单次头痛发作与基于国际头痛疾病分类第三版(ICHD-3)偏头痛和紧张型头痛标准的诊断性头痛日记进行比较。计算敏感性和特异性以评估可靠性,并使用kappa统计量计算一致性水平。
本研究纳入了30例被诊断为偏头痛和紧张型头痛的患者(87%为女性)。单次偏头痛发作分类的一致性水平显示敏感性为82%,特异性为78%,表示一致性水平较高(κ = 0.60)。单次紧张型头痛发作的分类显示敏感性为84%,特异性为72%,一致性水平为中等(κ = 0.54)。
数字日历被证明在监测偏头痛和紧张型头痛患者的单次头痛发作方面是有效的。在临床实践中,我们建议将数字日历用作头痛患者的监测工具,因为它们可以准确识别真正的偏头痛和紧张型头痛日。