• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络的头痛诊断问卷的开发和验证。

Development and validation of a web-based headache diagnosis questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.

Hankook Research, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 29;12(1):7032. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11008-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-11008-y
PMID:35488015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9052186/
Abstract

Information technology advances may help in conducting epidemiological studies using web-based surveys. Questionnaire-based headache diagnosis should be validated against the doctor's diagnosis. This study aimed to develop and validate a web-based diagnostic questionnaire for migraine, probable migraine (PM), and tension-type headache (TTH). We constructed a seven-item questionnaire for diagnosing migraine, PM, and TTH. A web-based survey was conducted among adults aged 20-59 years; migraine, PM, and TTH were diagnosed based on the responses. Validation interview was performed via telephone by a neurologist within 1 month after the web-based interview. Finally, 256 participants completed both web-based survey and validation interview. Of them, 121 (47.3%), 65 (25.4%), 61 (23.8%), and 9 (3.5%) were diagnosed with migraine, PM, TTH, and unclassified headache (UH), respectively in the web-based survey, whereas 119 (46.5%), 60 (23.4%), 74 (28.9%), 2 (0.8%), and 1 (0.4%) were diagnosed with migraine, PM, TTH, UH, and primary stabbing headache, respectively in the validation interview. The best agreement was found in migraine (sensitivity: 92.6%; specificity: 94.8%; kappa coefficient: 0.875), followed by TTH (sensitivity: 78.4%; specificity: 98.4%; kappa coefficient: 0.809). PM showed the least agreement (sensitivity: 85.0%; specificity: 92.9%; kappa coefficient: 0.757). In conclusion, our questionnaire is valid in identifying these headache disorders.

摘要

信息技术的进步可能有助于利用基于网络的调查进行流行病学研究。基于问卷的头痛诊断应与医生的诊断相验证。本研究旨在开发和验证一种用于偏头痛、可能偏头痛(PM)和紧张型头痛(TTH)的基于网络的诊断问卷。我们构建了一个用于诊断偏头痛、PM 和 TTH 的七项问卷。对 20-59 岁的成年人进行了基于网络的调查;根据回答诊断偏头痛、PM 和 TTH。在网络调查后的 1 个月内,由神经病学家通过电话进行验证访谈。最后,256 名参与者完成了网络调查和验证访谈。其中,121 人(47.3%)、65 人(25.4%)、61 人(23.8%)和 9 人(3.5%)在网络调查中分别被诊断为偏头痛、PM、TTH 和未分类头痛(UH),而 119 人(46.5%)、60 人(23.4%)、74 人(28.9%)、2 人(0.8%)和 1 人(0.4%)在验证访谈中分别被诊断为偏头痛、PM、TTH、UH 和原发性刺痛性头痛。在偏头痛方面发现了最佳的一致性(敏感性:92.6%;特异性:94.8%;kappa 系数:0.875),其次是 TTH(敏感性:78.4%;特异性:98.4%;kappa 系数:0.809)。PM 的一致性最低(敏感性:85.0%;特异性:92.9%;kappa 系数:0.757)。总之,我们的问卷在识别这些头痛障碍方面是有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/519b/9055052/7667b8719751/41598_2022_11008_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/519b/9055052/7667b8719751/41598_2022_11008_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/519b/9055052/7667b8719751/41598_2022_11008_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a web-based headache diagnosis questionnaire.基于网络的头痛诊断问卷的开发和验证。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 29;12(1):7032. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11008-y.
2
The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 2006-2008.基于问卷的诊断的有效性:第三次北特伦德拉格健康研究 2006-2008。
J Headache Pain. 2010 Feb;11(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s10194-009-0174-7. Epub 2009 Nov 28.
3
The HUNT4 study: the validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses.HUNT4 研究:基于问卷的诊断的有效性。
J Headache Pain. 2019 Jun 13;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1021-0.
4
Development and psychometric validation of the headache screening questionnaire - Dutch Version.头痛筛查问卷的制定与心理计量学验证 - 荷兰语版。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Oct;31:52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
5
Reliability and Validity of the Persian HIT-6 Questionnaire in Migraine and Tension-type Headache.波斯语版HIT-6问卷在偏头痛和紧张型头痛中的信度和效度
Pain Pract. 2014 Sep;14(7):625-31. doi: 10.1111/papr.12120. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
6
Validation of a german language questionnaire for screening for migraine, tension-type headache, and trigeminal autonomic cephalgias.一份用于筛查偏头痛、紧张型头痛和三叉自主神经性头痛的德语问卷的验证
Headache. 2007 Apr;47(4):546-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00758.x.
7
Development and Validation of a Japanese-Language Questionnaire to Screen for Tension-Type Headaches and Migraines.用于筛查紧张型头痛和偏头痛的日语问卷的开发与验证
Cureus. 2023 Sep 4;15(9):e44633. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44633. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence online engine in migraine: A multi-center study.人工智能在线引擎在偏头痛诊断中的准确性:一项多中心研究。
Headache. 2022 Jul;62(7):870-882. doi: 10.1111/head.14324. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
Time preference of headache attack and chronotype in migraine and tension-type headache.偏头痛和紧张型头痛的头痛发作时间偏好和昼夜类型。
Chronobiol Int. 2019 Nov;36(11):1528-1536. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2019.1658202. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
10
Characteristic and overlapping features of migraine and tension-type headache.偏头痛和紧张型头痛的特征及重叠特征。
Headache. 2006 Mar;46(3):461-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00377.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the Individual Potentials Questionnaire (IP-Q).个人潜能问卷(IP-Q)的编制与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 28;15(1):10708. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90868-6.
2
Coffee consumption and migraine: a population-based study.咖啡消费与偏头痛:一项基于人群的研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 12;14(1):6007. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56728-5.
3
Validation of a Digital Headache Calendar at a Tertiary Referral Center.三级转诊中心数字头痛日历的验证

本文引用的文献

1
Primary headaches during the COVID-19 lockdown in Germany: analysis of data from 2325 patients using an electronic headache diary.新冠疫情封锁期间德国的原发性头痛:使用电子头痛日记对 2325 名患者数据的分析。
J Headache Pain. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01273-z.
2
Hospital-based headache care during the Covid-19 pandemic in Denmark and Norway.丹麦和挪威新冠疫情期间的基于医院的头痛治疗。
J Headache Pain. 2020 Oct 29;21(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01195-2.
3
Validation of an algorithm for automated classification of migraine and tension-type headache attacks in an electronic headache diary.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 22;14(1):21. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010021.
4
Most bothersome symptom in migraine and probable migraine: A population-based study.偏头痛和可能的偏头痛中最困扰的症状:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 29;18(11):e0289729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289729. eCollection 2023.
5
Letter to the Editor: Frequency of Visual Aura in Non-Migraine Headache Strongly Depends on the Underlying Pathophysiology.致编辑的信:非偏头痛性头痛中视觉先兆的发生率很大程度上取决于潜在的病理生理学。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Oct 23;38(41):e368. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e368.
6
Development and Validation of a Japanese-Language Questionnaire to Screen for Tension-Type Headaches and Migraines.用于筛查紧张型头痛和偏头痛的日语问卷的开发与验证
Cureus. 2023 Sep 4;15(9):e44633. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44633. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Visual Aura in Non-Migraine Headaches: A Population Study.非偏头痛性头痛中的视觉先兆:一项人群研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Aug 7;38(31):e237. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e237.
8
Relationship Between Asthma and Headache Attacks in the Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯卡西姆地区哮喘与头痛发作之间的关系。
Cureus. 2023 May 31;15(5):e39784. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39784. eCollection 2023 May.
验证一种用于电子头痛日记中偏头痛和紧张型头痛发作自动分类的算法。
J Headache Pain. 2020 Jun 12;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01139-w.
4
The applicability of web-based solutions in headache epidemiology research.基于网络的解决方案在头痛流行病学研究中的适用性。
J Headache Pain. 2020 Jun 1;21(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01141-2.
5
The HUNT4 study: the validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses.HUNT4 研究:基于问卷的诊断的有效性。
J Headache Pain. 2019 Jun 13;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1021-0.
6
A web-based, branching logic questionnaire for the automated classification of migraine.一个基于网络的、分支逻辑的问卷,用于自动分类偏头痛。
Cephalalgia. 2019 Sep;39(10):1257-1266. doi: 10.1177/0333102419847749. Epub 2019 May 1.
7
My Migraine Voice survey: a global study of disease burden among individuals with migraine for whom preventive treatments have failed.我的偏头痛声音调查:一项针对预防治疗失败的偏头痛患者疾病负担的全球研究。
J Headache Pain. 2018 Nov 27;19(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0946-z.
8
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition.国际头痛协会(IHS)头痛分类委员会《国际头痛疾病分类》第三版
Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202.
9
Reasons for non-participation and ways to enhance participation in health examination surveys-the Health 2011 Survey.不参与健康检查调查的原因及提高参与度的方法——“健康 2011 调查”。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(5):909-911. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx098.
10
Anxiety and Depression in Tension-Type Headache: A Population-Based Study.紧张型头痛中的焦虑与抑郁:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 26;11(10):e0165316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165316. eCollection 2016.