• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BRCA1/2基因携带者遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险及死亡率的预防性干预措施

Prophylactic Interventions for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks and Mortality in BRCA1/2 Carriers.

作者信息

Liu Taoran, Yu Jing, Gao Yangyang, Ma Xinyang, Jiang Shan, Gu Yuanyuan, Ming Wai-Kit

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.

Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School and Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 24;16(1):103. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010103.

DOI:10.3390/cancers16010103
PMID:38201529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10778044/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancers (HBOCs) pose significant health risks worldwide and are mitigated by prophylactic interventions. However, a meta-analysis of their efficacy and the impact of different genetic variants on their effectiveness is lacking.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, adhering to Cochrane guidelines. The review encompassed studies that involved prophylactic interventions for healthy women with BRCA variants, focusing on cancer incidence and mortality outcomes. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for risk of bias assessment. We pooled the extracted outcomes using random effects models and conducted subgroup analyses stratified by intervention, variant, and cancer types.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that prophylactic interventions significantly reduced cancer risk and mortality. The subgroup analysis showed a greater protective effect for BRCA2 than BRCA1 variant carriers. Risk-reducing surgeries (RRS) were more effective than chemoprevention, with RRS notably reducing cancer risk by 56% compared to 39% for chemoprevention. Prophylactic oophorectomy significantly reduced HBOC risks, while the effect of prophylactic mastectomy and chemoprevention on mortality was less conclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic interventions significantly reduce the risk of HBOC and associated mortality. This comprehensive analysis provides insights for future economic evaluations and clinical decision-making in HBOC interventions.

摘要

背景

遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOCs)在全球范围内构成重大健康风险,预防性干预措施可降低这些风险。然而,目前缺乏对其疗效以及不同基因变异对其有效性影响的荟萃分析。

方法

按照Cochrane指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。该评价纳入了针对携带BRCA变异的健康女性进行预防性干预的研究,重点关注癌症发病率和死亡率结局。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行偏倚风险评估。我们使用随机效应模型汇总提取的结局,并按干预措施、变异类型和癌症类型进行亚组分析。

结果

共有21项研究符合纳入标准。荟萃分析表明,预防性干预措施显著降低了癌症风险和死亡率。亚组分析显示,BRCA2变异携带者比BRCA1变异携带者的保护作用更大。降低风险的手术(RRS)比化学预防更有效,RRS显著降低癌症风险56%,而化学预防为39%。预防性卵巢切除术显著降低了HBOC风险,而预防性乳房切除术和化学预防对死亡率的影响则不太明确。

结论

预防性干预措施显著降低了HBOC风险及相关死亡率。这一综合分析为未来HBOC干预措施的经济学评估和临床决策提供了见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/3f6a7d3137bb/cancers-16-00103-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/16e8513b63fc/cancers-16-00103-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/ffe55ab7c4fd/cancers-16-00103-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/362ad9370ea2/cancers-16-00103-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/6cced9c3d458/cancers-16-00103-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/2728413eac1f/cancers-16-00103-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/5188febd634a/cancers-16-00103-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/3f6a7d3137bb/cancers-16-00103-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/16e8513b63fc/cancers-16-00103-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/ffe55ab7c4fd/cancers-16-00103-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/362ad9370ea2/cancers-16-00103-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/6cced9c3d458/cancers-16-00103-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/2728413eac1f/cancers-16-00103-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/5188febd634a/cancers-16-00103-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0e/10778044/3f6a7d3137bb/cancers-16-00103-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Prophylactic Interventions for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks and Mortality in BRCA1/2 Carriers.BRCA1/2基因携带者遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险及死亡率的预防性干预措施
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 24;16(1):103. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010103.
2
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: what surgeons need to know.BRCA 突变携带者的双侧预防性乳房切除术:外科医生需要了解的内容。
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:1-2.
3
Intra-abdominal carcinomatosis after prophylactic oophorectomy in women of hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome kindreds associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.与BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变相关的遗传性乳腺癌卵巢癌综合征家族中女性接受预防性卵巢切除术后的腹腔内癌转移
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 May;97(2):457-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.01.039.
4
Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.对携带BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变的女性进行降低风险的双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012464.pub2.
5
Association between clinical characteristics and risk-reduction interventions in women who underwent BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing: a single-institution study.接受BRCA1和BRCA2检测的女性临床特征与风险降低干预措施之间的关联:一项单机构研究。
Cancer. 2006 Dec 15;107(12):2745-51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22352.
6
Effectiveness of Prophylactic Surgeries in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.预防性手术在 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 基因突变携带者中的效果:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Aug 1;22(15):3971-81. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1465. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
9
10
[Current clinical issues and recent trends in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Japan-genetic testing for HBOC and risk-reducing surgery].[日本遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的当前临床问题及近期趋势——HBOC的基因检测与降低风险手术]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014 Nov;41(11):1333-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Redefining Risk, Biomarkers, and Precision Therapy for Hereditary Ovarian Cancer: A Review.重新定义遗传性卵巢癌的风险、生物标志物和精准治疗:综述
ACS Omega. 2025 Aug 16;10(33):36890-36903. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c05260. eCollection 2025 Aug 26.
2
Advancements and emerging trends in photodynamic therapy: innovations in cancer treatment and beyond.光动力疗法的进展与新兴趋势:癌症治疗及其他领域的创新
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s43630-025-00765-0.
3
The Spectrum of Genetic Mutations Among Patients with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Chemoprevention and Lifestyle Modifications for Risk Reduction in Sporadic and Hereditary Breast Cancer.化学预防和生活方式改变以降低散发性和遗传性乳腺癌的风险
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 21;11(16):2360. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162360.
2
Tamoxifen and the risk of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.他莫昔芬与携带 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变的女性乳腺癌风险。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Sep;201(2):257-264. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06991-3. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
Breast Cancer Screening Should Embrace Precision Medicine: Evidence by Reviewing Economic Evaluations in China.
遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者的基因突变谱
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 26;14(13):4536. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134536.
4
Title of report: second primary ovarian carcinomas after breast cancer diagnosis- an analysis of a single cancer centre in China.报告标题:乳腺癌诊断后发生的第二原发性卵巢癌——来自中国一家癌症中心的分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 3;15:1553366. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1553366. eCollection 2025.
5
Exploring the application of herbal photosensitizers in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy against .探索草药光敏剂在抗……抗菌光动力疗法中的应用
3 Biotech. 2025 Feb;15(2):48. doi: 10.1007/s13205-024-04205-1. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
6
Secondary Risk-Reducing Strategies for Contralateral Breast Cancer in BRCA1/2 Variant Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.BRCA1/2基因变异携带者对侧乳腺癌的二级风险降低策略:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Adv Ther. 2025 Jan;42(1):106-131. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03054-x. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
7
Harnessing bacterial metabolites for enhanced cancer chemotherapy: unveiling unique therapeutic potentials.利用细菌代谢物增强癌症化疗:揭示独特的治疗潜力。
Arch Microbiol. 2024 Oct 29;206(11):449. doi: 10.1007/s00203-024-04179-x.
8
Hypericin-mediated photodynamic therapy inhibits metastasis and EMT of colorectal cancer cells by regulating RhoA-ROCK1 signaling pathway.金丝桃素介导的光动力疗法通过调节 RhoA-ROCK1 信号通路抑制结直肠癌细胞的转移和 EMT。
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2024 Jul;23(7):1361-1372. doi: 10.1007/s43630-024-00601-x. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
乳腺癌筛查应拥抱精准医学:基于中国经济评估研究的证据。
Adv Ther. 2023 Apr;40(4):1393-1417. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02450-z. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
4
Patient Preferences in Targeted Pharmacotherapy for Cancers: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.患者对癌症靶向药物治疗的偏好:离散选择实验的系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Jan;41(1):43-57. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01198-8. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
5
Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China.将生产力损失纳入健康经济评估:对全球指南和实践的综述,以及对中国研究议程的启示。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009777.
6
Uptake Rates of Risk-Reducing Surgeries for Women at Increased Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Applied to Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Scoping Systematic Review.应用于成本效益分析的遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险增加女性的降低风险手术的接受率:一项范围界定性系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 31;14(7):1786. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071786.
7
Incorporating future unrelated medical costs in cost-effectiveness analysis in China.将未来无关医疗费用纳入中国成本效益分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Oct;6(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006655.
8
Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy and the Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy Below the Age of Natural Menopause: Scientific Impact Paper No. 66 October 2021: Scientific Impact Paper No. 66.预防性输卵管卵巢切除术及绝经前激素替代治疗的应用:科学影响评估报告 66 号,2021 年 10 月:科学影响评估报告 66 号。
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):e16-e34. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16896. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
9
Addressing methodological and ethical issues in practicing health economic evaluation in China.解决中国卫生经济评价实践中的方法学和伦理问题。
J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020322. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.020322.
10
Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, natural menopause, and breast cancer risk: an international prospective cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术、自然绝经与乳腺癌风险:BRCA1 和 BRCA2 突变携带者的国际前瞻性队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Jan 16;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-1247-4.