OBJECTIVE

The incidence of hip fracture in the elderly is increasing. Robot navigation technology has the advantages of minimally invasive and accurate. To explore the difference between the clinical effects of proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA) assisted by robot navigation in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture and traditional PFNA in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly; analyze the advantages and feasibility of PFNA assisted by robot navigation in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 2021 to October 2022, the elderly (>65 years old) with femoral intertrochanteric fracture underwent surgery in our center. Divided the patients included in the study into 2 groups based on the surgical method. The surgical method of robot group was PFNA fixation assisted by robot navigation, while the surgical method of traditional group was classic PFNA fixation, Baseline data (general condition, Evans classification, time from injury to operation, preoperative hemoglobin) and observation indicators (intraoperative bleeding, operation time, the length of incision for mail nail insertion, postoperative hemoglobin drop, blood transfusion rate and the Harris score of hip joint 1 year after operation) of the two groups were collected to compare whether there were differences between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative bleeding in the robot group was 68.17±10.66 mL, the intraoperative bleeding in the traditional group was 174±8.11mL (P<0.001). The operation time in the robot group was 68.81 ± 6.89 min, in the traditional group, the operation time was 76.94 ± 8.18 min (P<0.001). The length of incision for mail nail insertion in the robot group was 3.53 ± 0.63 cm, the length of the incision for mail nail insertion in the traditional group was 4.23 ± 0.71 cm (P<0.001). 5 patients (13.9%) in the robot group received blood transfusion treatment, and 13 patients (36.1%) in the traditional group received blood transfusion treatment (P=0.029). The hemoglobin in the robot group decreased by 14.81 ± 3.27 g/l after operation compared with that before operation, while that in the traditional group decreased by 16.69 ± 3.32 g/l (P=0.018). The Harris score of the hip joint of the affected limb in the robot group was excellent in 25 cases, good in 8 cases and poor in 3 cases one year after the operation; In the traditional group, Harris scores were excellent in 18 cases, good in 11 cases and poor in 7 cases (P=0.021).

CONCLUSION

PFNA fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with robot navigation assistance has the advantages of minimally invasive and accurate, shorter operation time, less bleeding and lower blood transfusion rate than traditional surgical methods, and has certain advantages in reducing postoperative complications of elderly patients.