• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

权威机构与信任纳税人的影响:来自奥地利、芬兰和匈牙利的扩展滑坡框架证据。

The impact of powerful authorities and trustful taxpayers: evidence for the extended slippery slope framework from Austria, Finland, and Hungary.

作者信息

Gangl Katharina, Hofmann Eva, Hartl Barbara, Berkics Mihály

机构信息

Department of Economic and Social Psychology, University Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Competence Center of Empirical Research Methods, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Policy Stud. 2019 Feb 11;41(1):98-111. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1577375. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1080/01442872.2019.1577375
PMID:32406419
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7194257/
Abstract

Tax authorities utilize a wide range of instruments to motivate honest taxpaying ranging from strict audits to fair procedures or personalized support, differing from country to country. However, little is known about how these different instruments and taxpayers' trust influence the generation of interaction climates between tax authorities and taxpayers, motivations to comply, and particularly, tax compliance. The present research examines the extended slippery slope framework (eSSF), which distinguishes tax authorities' instruments into different qualities of power of authority (coercive and legitimate) and trust in authorities (reason-based and implicit), to shed light on the effect of differences between power and trust. We test eSSF assumptions with survey data from taxpayers from three culturally different countries ( = 700) who also vary concerning their perceptions of power, trust, interaction climates, and tax motivations. Results support assumptions of the eSSF. Across all countries, the relation of coercive power and tax compliance was mediated by implicit trust. The connection from legitimate power to tax compliance is partially mediated by reason-based trust. The relationship between implicit trust and tax compliance is mediated by a confidence climate and committed cooperation. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

摘要

税务机关运用一系列广泛的手段来激励诚实纳税,从严格审计到公平程序或个性化支持,各国情况各不相同。然而,对于这些不同手段以及纳税人信任如何影响税务机关与纳税人之间互动氛围的形成、纳税动机,尤其是税收遵从,我们却知之甚少。本研究考察了扩展的滑坡框架(eSSF),该框架将税务机关的手段区分为不同性质的权威力量(强制力和合法性)以及对权威的信任(基于理性和隐性),以阐明权力与信任差异的影响。我们用来自三个文化不同国家(n = 700)纳税人的调查数据来检验eSSF假设,这些纳税人在对权力、信任、互动氛围和纳税动机的认知方面也存在差异。结果支持了eSSF的假设。在所有国家中,强制力与税收遵从之间的关系由隐性信任介导。从合法权力到税收遵从的联系部分由基于理性的信任介导。隐性信任与税收遵从之间通过信任氛围和承诺合作介导。本文讨论了理论和实践意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd94/7194257/683ef96442e2/CPOS_A_1577375_F0002_OB.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd94/7194257/c1b9bbc8f558/CPOS_A_1577375_F0001_OB.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd94/7194257/683ef96442e2/CPOS_A_1577375_F0002_OB.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd94/7194257/c1b9bbc8f558/CPOS_A_1577375_F0001_OB.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd94/7194257/683ef96442e2/CPOS_A_1577375_F0002_OB.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of powerful authorities and trustful taxpayers: evidence for the extended slippery slope framework from Austria, Finland, and Hungary.权威机构与信任纳税人的影响:来自奥地利、芬兰和匈牙利的扩展滑坡框架证据。
Policy Stud. 2019 Feb 11;41(1):98-111. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1577375. eCollection 2020.
2
Tax authorities' interaction with taxpayers: A conception of compliance in social dilemmas by power and trust.税务机关与纳税人的互动:基于权力和信任的社会困境中的遵从概念。
New Ideas Psychol. 2015 Feb;37:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.001.
3
Enhancing Tax Compliance through Coercive and Legitimate Power of Tax Authorities by Concurrently Diminishing or Facilitating Trust in Tax Authorities.通过税务机关的强制力和合法权力来提高税收遵从度,同时减少或促进对税务机关的信任。
Law Policy. 2014 Jul;36(3):290-313. doi: 10.1111/lapo.12021.
4
Authorities' Coercive and Legitimate Power: The Impact on Cognitions Underlying Cooperation.当局的强制力与合法权力:对合作背后认知的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 18;8:5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00005. eCollection 2017.
5
The Relationship Between Austrian Tax Auditors and Self-Employed Taxpayers: Evidence From a Qualitative Study.奥地利税务审计员与个体经营纳税人之间的关系:来自定性研究的证据
Front Psychol. 2019 May 13;10:1034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01034. eCollection 2019.
6
A dataset on declared tax evasion attitudes of students and entrepreneurs from Poland under the slippery slope framework.在滑坡框架下,关于波兰学生和企业家申报逃税态度的数据集。
Data Brief. 2023 Apr 25;48:109183. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109183. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Does the sole description of a tax authority affect tax evasion?--the impact of described coercive and legitimate power.税务机关的单一描述会影响逃税行为吗?——所描述的强制力和合法权力的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 29;10(4):e0123355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123355. eCollection 2015.
8
Tax Talk: An Exploration of Online Discussions Among Taxpayers.税务话题:纳税人在线讨论探究
J Bus Ethics. 2018;149(4):931-944. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3032-y. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
9
The economic crisis during the COVID-19 pandemic has a negative effect on tax compliance: Results from a scenario study in Austria.新冠疫情期间的经济危机对纳税遵从产生负面影响:奥地利一项情景研究的结果
J Econ Psychol. 2022 Dec;93:102572. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2022.102572. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
10
Do taxpayers consider quality labels as a form of recommendation for good tax-preparation services? Evidence from Germany.纳税人是否将质量标签视为优质税务申报服务的一种推荐形式?来自德国的证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 19;10(1):e23357. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23357. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Coercive and legitimate authority impact tax honesty: evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments.强制性和合法权威对纳税诚信的影响:来自行为和ERP实验的证据
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jul 1;12(7):1108-1117. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx029.
2
Authorities' Coercive and Legitimate Power: The Impact on Cognitions Underlying Cooperation.当局的强制力与合法权力:对合作背后认知的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 18;8:5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00005. eCollection 2017.
3
Patriotism's Impact on Cooperation with the State: An Experimental Study on Tax Compliance.
爱国主义对与国家合作的影响:一项关于纳税遵从的实验研究
Polit Psychol. 2016 Dec;37(6):867-881. doi: 10.1111/pops.12294. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
4
On sanction-goal justifications: How and why deterrence justifications undermine rule compliance.关于制裁目的的论证:威慑论证如何以及为何破坏规则遵从。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Apr;112(4):577-588. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000084. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
5
Trust, Punishment, and Cooperation Across 18 Societies: A Meta-Analysis.信任、惩罚与合作:跨越 18 个社会的综合分析。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul;8(4):363-79. doi: 10.1177/1745691613488533.
6
Enhancing Tax Compliance through Coercive and Legitimate Power of Tax Authorities by Concurrently Diminishing or Facilitating Trust in Tax Authorities.通过税务机关的强制力和合法权力来提高税收遵从度,同时减少或促进对税务机关的信任。
Law Policy. 2014 Jul;36(3):290-313. doi: 10.1111/lapo.12021.
7
Does the sole description of a tax authority affect tax evasion?--the impact of described coercive and legitimate power.税务机关的单一描述会影响逃税行为吗?——所描述的强制力和合法权力的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 29;10(4):e0123355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123355. eCollection 2015.
8
Tax authorities' interaction with taxpayers: A conception of compliance in social dilemmas by power and trust.税务机关与纳税人的互动:基于权力和信任的社会困境中的遵从概念。
New Ideas Psychol. 2015 Feb;37:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.001.
9
Effects of supervision on tax compliance: Evidence from a field experiment in Austria.监管对纳税遵从的影响:来自奥地利一项实地实验的证据。
Econ Lett. 2014 Jun;123(3):378-382. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.03.027.
10
Bases of social power, leadership styles, and organizational commitment.社会权力基础、领导风格和组织承诺。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(6):1122-34. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.733398. Epub 2012 Oct 16.