Bergus Katherine, Barash Brandon, Justice Lauren, Srinivas Shruthi, Fabia Renata, Schwartz Dana, Thakkar Rajan
Nationwide Children's Hospital, Burn Center 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.
The Ohio State University 281 West Lane Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Int J Burns Trauma. 2023 Dec 15;13(6):204-213. eCollection 2023.
Hand burn injuries are common among pediatric patients. Management of deep partial thickness and full thickness hand burns varies by center, with some favoring upfront autografting and others using dermal substrates (DS) as biologic dressings to accelerate burn wound healing. Achieving best outcomes is critical in children given the propensity of burn wound scars to affect hand function as a child grows and develops. Given potential complications associated with autografting in children, our center often prefers to treat pediatric hand burns initially with DS, with subsequent autografting if there is failure to heal. In this case series, we examined the outcomes of this practice.
We conducted a retrospective review of pediatric burn patients with <10% total body surface area (TBSA) burns who underwent application of DS to hand burn injuries between 2013 and 2021. Burn mechanism, patient demographics, wound treatment details, healing and functional outcomes, and complications were collected. Descriptive statistics were computed.
Fifty patients with hand burns and overall <10% TBSA burns underwent application of DS to hands. Median age at the time of injury was 4.1 years (IQR: 1.8, 10.7) and 29 patients (58%) were male. Eighteen (36%) patients had bilateral hand burns, 10 (20%) had burns to their dominant hand, 6 (12%) their non-dominant hand, and 16 (32%) had unestablished or unknown hand dominance. Subsequent autografting was required in 5 (10%) patients treated initially with DS; four of these patients had full thickness injuries. Five (10%) patients developed contracture at the site of DS application for which two underwent scar release with tissue rearrangement, one underwent laser treatment, and two were managed conservatively. Most patients had splints (94%), or compression garments (54%) prescribed to aid in functional recovery.
Children with hand burns who underwent DS application healed well with few requiring autografting or developing contractures. Most patients who needed autografting had deeper injuries. Most patients who developed a contracture required additional procedural intervention. Recognizing factors that contribute to the need for autografting after initial treatment with DS can help direct intervention decisions in pediatric patients with hand burn injuries.
手部烧伤在儿科患者中很常见。深度部分厚度和全层手部烧伤的治疗方法因中心而异,一些中心倾向于早期自体植皮,而其他中心则使用真皮基质(DS)作为生物敷料来加速烧伤创面愈合。鉴于烧伤创面瘢痕在儿童生长发育过程中影响手部功能的倾向,在儿童中取得最佳治疗效果至关重要。考虑到儿童自体植皮相关的潜在并发症,我们中心通常更倾向于先用DS治疗小儿手部烧伤,如果未能愈合则进行后续自体植皮。在本病例系列中,我们研究了这种治疗方法的效果。
我们对2013年至2021年间手部烧伤且烧伤总面积小于10%的儿科烧伤患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者接受了DS治疗手部烧伤。收集了烧伤机制、患者人口统计学资料、伤口治疗细节、愈合和功能结果以及并发症。计算了描述性统计数据。
50例手部烧伤且烧伤总面积小于10%的患者接受了手部DS治疗。受伤时的中位年龄为4.1岁(四分位间距:1.8,10.7),29例(58%)为男性。18例(36%)患者双手烧伤,10例(20%)优势手烧伤,6例(12%)非优势手烧伤,16例(32%)优势手情况未明确或未知。最初接受DS治疗的5例(10%)患者需要进行后续自体植皮;其中4例患者为全层损伤。5例(10%)患者在DS应用部位出现挛缩,其中2例接受了瘢痕松解和组织重排,1例接受了激光治疗,2例采用保守治疗。大多数患者(94%)使用了夹板,或(54%)使用了加压服装来辅助功能恢复。
接受DS治疗的手部烧伤儿童愈合良好,很少需要自体植皮或出现挛缩。大多数需要自体植皮的患者损伤较深。大多数出现挛缩的患者需要额外的手术干预。识别初次用DS治疗后导致需要自体植皮的因素有助于指导小儿手部烧伤患者的干预决策。