人工智能回答的关于高级生命支持的临床问题。ChatGPT、谷歌巴德和微软必应助手之间的比较。 - Suppr

Clinical questions on advanced life support answered by artificial intelligence. A comparison between ChatGPT, Google Bard and Microsoft Copilot.

作者信息

Semeraro Federico, Gamberini Lorenzo, Carmona Francesc, Monsieurs Koenraad G

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Prehospital Emergency, Maggiore Hospital Carlo Alberto Pizzardi, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2024 Feb;195:110114. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110114. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110114

PMID:38211808

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Clinical questions on advanced life support answered by artificial intelligence. A comparison between ChatGPT, Google Bard and Microsoft Copilot.人工智能回答的关于高级生命支持的临床问题。ChatGPT、谷歌巴德和微软必应助手之间的比较。

Resuscitation. 2024 Feb;195:110114. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110114. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

How AI Responds to Common Lung Cancer Questions: ChatGPT vs Google Bard.人工智能如何回答常见肺癌问题：ChatGPT 与 Google Bard 对比。

Radiology. 2023 Jun;307(5):e230922. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230922.

Quality of information about urologic pathology in English and Spanish from ChatGPT, BARD, and Copilot.ChatGPT、BARD 和 Copilot 提供的英文和西班牙文泌尿科病理学信息的质量。

Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2024 Jun;48(5):398-403. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.02.009. Epub 2024 Feb 17.

Artificial intelligence chatbots as sources of patient education material for obstructive sleep apnoea: ChatGPT versus Google Bard.人工智能聊天机器人作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者教育材料的来源：ChatGPT 与 Google Bard 对比。

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):985-993. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08319-9. Epub 2023 Nov 2.

Evaluation of the Performance of Generative AI Large Language Models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in Supporting Evidence-Based Dentistry: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.评估生成式 AI 大语言模型 ChatGPT、Google Bard 和 Microsoft Bing Chat 在支持循证牙科方面的性能：比较混合方法研究。

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 28;25:e51580. doi: 10.2196/51580.

The performance of artificial intelligence large language model-linked chatbots in surgical decision-making for gastroesophageal reflux disease.人工智能大语言模型关联型聊天机器人在胃食管反流病手术决策中的应用。

Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2320-2330. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10807-w. Epub 2024 Apr 17.

Can artificial intelligence replace biochemists? A study comparing interpretation of thyroid function test results by ChatGPT and Google Bard to practising biochemists.人工智能能否取代生物化学家？一项将 ChatGPT 和 Google Bard 对甲状腺功能测试结果的解释与执业生物化学家进行比较的研究。

Ann Clin Biochem. 2024 Mar;61(2):143-149. doi: 10.1177/00045632231203473. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

Assessment of readability, reliability, and quality of ChatGPT®, BARD®, Gemini®, Copilot®, Perplexity® responses on palliative care.评估 ChatGPT®、BARD®、 Gemini®、Copilot®、Perplexity® 在姑息治疗方面的可读性、可靠性和质量。

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 16;103(33):e39305. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039305.

Evaluating the performance of large language models: ChatGPT and Google Bard in generating differential diagnoses in clinicopathological conferences of neurodegenerative disorders.评估大型语言模型的性能：ChatGPT 和 Google Bard 在神经退行性疾病临床病理会议中生成鉴别诊断的能力。

Brain Pathol. 2024 May;34(3):e13207. doi: 10.1111/bpa.13207. Epub 2023 Aug 8.

Comparative accuracy of ChatGPT-4, Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini in the Italian entrance test for healthcare sciences degrees: a cross-sectional study.ChatGPT-4、微软 Copilot 和谷歌 Gemini 在意大利医疗科学学位入学考试中的比较准确性：一项横断面研究。

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05630-9.

引用本文的文献

Potential role of large language models and personalized medicine to innovate cardiac rehabilitation.大语言模型和个性化医疗在创新心脏康复中的潜在作用。

World J Clin Cases. 2025 Jul 6;13(19):98095. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i19.98095.

Comparison of performance of artificial intelligence tools in answering emergency medicine question pool: ChatGPT 4.0, Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot.人工智能工具在回答急诊医学题库问题方面的性能比较：ChatGPT 4.0、谷歌Gemini和微软Copilot

Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;41(4):968-972. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.4.11178.

Evaluation of correctness and reliability of GPT, Bard, and Bing chatbots' responses in basic life support scenarios.评估GPT、Bard和必应聊天机器人在基本生命支持场景中回答的正确性和可靠性。

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82948-w.

Enhancing Patient Education on Cardiovascular Rehabilitation with Large Language Models.利用大语言模型加强心血管康复患者教育

Mo Med. 2025 Jan-Feb;122(1):67-71.

ChatGPT-4 Omni's superiority in answering multiple-choice oral radiology questions.ChatGPT-4 Omni在回答口腔放射学选择题方面的优势。

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05554-w.

Leveraging Generative Artificial Intelligence Models in Patient Education on Inferior Vena Cava Filters.在下肢静脉滤器患者教育中利用生成式人工智能模型

Clin Pract. 2024 Jul 30;14(4):1507-1514. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14040121.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clinical questions on advanced life support answered by artificial intelligence. A comparison between ChatGPT, Google Bard and Microsoft Copilot.

作者信息

机构信息

出版信息

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献检索

文件翻译

深度研究

Suppr 超能文献

相似文献

引用本文的文献