Department of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, 183 Xinqiao Main Street, Shapingba, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):1283-1291. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08105-5. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
To systematically evaluate the perioperative effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on anterior cervical spine surgery by means of meta-analysis.
According to the PRISMA guidelines, the article's search on the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang data resource system, VIP, PubMed database and Cochrane library was conducted to identify clinical studies investigating the effects of ERAS protocols on anterior cervical spine surgery. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed for the clinical outcomes extracted from the studies that met inclusion criteria.
Of the 21 studies identified from the article search, 10 studies met inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed shorter length of stay (LOS) (MD = -2.16, 95% CI (-2.57, -1.75), P < 0.00001) and higher patient satisfaction for the ERAS protocols (OR = 3.13, 95% CI (1.97, 4.98), P < 0.00001). Furthermore, ERAS programs led to significant decreases in cost (MD = -0.81, 95% CI (-1.08, -0.53), P < 0.00001) and complication rates (OR = 0.15, 95% CI (0.08, 0.27), P < 0.00001), but no difference in 90-day readmission (OR = 0.63, 95% CI (0.30, 1.35), P = 0.24).
The data of this study suggest that the implementation of ERAS protocol decreases LOS, cost and complications rates and improve satisfaction for the patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery. To support the practice use of ERAS in anterior cervical spine surgery further, controlled trials will be indispensable.
通过荟萃分析系统评价加速康复外科(ERAS)方案在前路颈椎手术中的围手术期效果。
根据 PRISMA 指南,对中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据资源系统、维普、PubMed 数据库和 Cochrane 图书馆中的文章进行搜索,以确定研究 ERAS 方案对前路颈椎手术影响的临床研究。对符合纳入标准的研究中提取的临床结果进行定量荟萃分析。
从文章搜索中确定了 21 项研究,其中 10 项符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,ERAS 方案的住院时间(LOS)更短(MD=-2.16,95%CI(-2.57,-1.75),P<0.00001),患者满意度更高(OR=3.13,95%CI(1.97,4.98),P<0.00001)。此外,ERAS 方案还显著降低了成本(MD=-0.81,95%CI(-1.08,-0.53),P<0.00001)和并发症发生率(OR=0.15,95%CI(0.08,0.27),P<0.00001),但 90 天再入院率无差异(OR=0.63,95%CI(0.30,1.35),P=0.24)。
本研究数据表明,实施 ERAS 方案可缩短 LOS、降低成本和并发症发生率,提高患者满意度。为了进一步支持 ERAS 在前路颈椎手术中的实际应用,还需要进行对照试验。