评估沙特阿拉伯西部医院药房联合委员会国际认证要求的存在情况：一项横断面研究。

Assessing the Presence of the Joint Commission International Accreditation Requirements in Western Saudi Arabia Hospital Pharmacies: A Cross-sectional Study.

作者信息

Fathelrahman Ahmed Ibrahim, Almalki Huda Abdullah, Bajunaid Hanan Rashad, Al-Harthi Ghaidaa Khalid, Aljuaid Manal Omar, Majrashi Ruqayyah Yahya, Alsuwat Mohammed Abdullah

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Res Pharm Pract. 2023 Nov 27;12(1):1-8. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_5_23. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.

DOI:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_5_23

PMID:38213607

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10779688/

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Central Board of Accreditation for Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) the national Saudi accreditation body accredited most hospitals in Saudi Arabia whereas, the Joint Commission International (JCI) a well-known international accreditation body accredited some hospitals. We assessed Western Saudi Arabia hospital pharmacists' knowledge, opinions, and observations about pharmacy-related JCI accreditation criteria needed for hospitals.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional survey-based study conducted among pharmacy personnel working in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Military, and private hospitals in the Makkah region in western Saudi Arabia. The present report represents the findings of descriptive and comparative analyses. Comparative analyses were tested by Student's -test, analysis of variance, and Chi-square when applicable and a ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

FINDINGS

One hundred and one pharmacists completed the survey; most of them were from Taif (53.5%) and Jeddah (37.6%) and fewer from Makkah (8.9%). The highest proportions were from MOH (55.4%), private (29.7%), and some from military (14.9%) hospitals. They worked mostly in hospitals accredited with CBAHI (93.1%) than JCI (58.4%) and only (41.6%) worked with quality units. Correct answers on knowledge items ranged from 14.9% to 65.3%. On five-point Likert Scale, they showed supportive ratings on how they perceived the importance of JCI statement provided (overall average score: 3.78) and on how statement criteria are implemented in their hospitals (overall average score: 3.76). Higher proportions of those working in quality units compared to their counterparts were aware that accreditation cycles for JCI and CBAHI are identical (66.7% vs. 55.9%, = 0.009) and that JCI criteria are more concise than CBAHI (59.5% vs. 52.5%, = 0.007). Higher proportions of those working in JCI-accredited hospitals compared to their counterparts were aware that JCI criteria are clearer than CBAHI (55.9% vs. 33.3%, = 0.021) and that JCI criteria are more concise than CBAHI (61% vs. 47.6%, = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

To a high extent, pharmacists were supportive of JCI criteria and considered the criteria to be implemented in their hospitals. There is a room for improvement to enhance awareness and support of JCI quality criteria among pharmacists.

摘要

目的

沙特阿拉伯中央医疗机构认证委员会（CBAHI）是沙特的国家认证机构，为沙特阿拉伯的大多数医院提供了认证，而国际联合委员会（JCI）是一家知名的国际认证机构，为一些医院提供了认证。我们评估了沙特阿拉伯西部医院药剂师对医院所需的与药房相关的JCI认证标准的知识、意见和观察。

方法

这是一项基于横断面调查的研究，对象是在沙特阿拉伯西部麦加地区的卫生部（MOH）、军事医院和私立医院工作的药剂人员。本报告展示了描述性和对比性分析的结果。适用时，对比性分析通过学生t检验、方差分析和卡方检验进行，P≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

101名药剂师完成了调查；他们大多来自塔伊夫（53.5%）和吉达（37.6%），来自麦加的较少（8.9%）。比例最高的来自卫生部医院（55.4%）、私立医院（29.7%），还有一些来自军事医院（14.9%）。他们大多在获得CBAHI认证的医院工作（93.1%），而非JCI认证的医院（58.4%），只有41.6%的人在质量部门工作。知识题目的正确答案比例在14.9%至65.3%之间。在五点李克特量表上，他们对所提供的JCI声明的重要性的认知（总体平均得分：3.78）以及对声明标准在其医院的实施方式的认知（总体平均得分：3.76）给予了支持性评分。与在非质量部门工作的人员相比，在质量部门工作的人员中，有更高比例的人知道JCI和CBAHI的认证周期是相同的（66.7%对55.9%，P = 0.009），并且知道JCI标准比CBAHI标准更简洁（59.5%对52.5%，P = 0.007）。与在非JCI认证医院工作的人员相比，在JCI认证医院工作的人员中，有更高比例的人知道JCI标准比CBAHI标准更清晰（55.9%对33.3%，P = 0.021），并且知道JCI标准比CBAHI标准更简洁（61%对47.6%，P = 0.012）。