Misselhorn Catrin
Philosophisches Seminar, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Jul;33(3):346-359. doi: 10.1017/S0963180123000555. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
It is a common view that artificial systems could play an important role in dealing with the shortage of caregivers due to demographic change. One argument to show that this is also in the interest of care-dependent persons is that artificial systems might significantly enhance user autonomy since they might stay longer in their homes. This argument presupposes that the artificial systems in question do not require permanent supervision and control by human caregivers. For this reason, they need the capacity for some degree of moral decision-making and agency to cope with morally relevant situations (artificial morality). Machine ethics provides the theoretical and ethical framework for artificial morality. This article scrutinizes the question how artificial moral agents that enhance user autonomy could look like. It discusses, in particular, the suggestion that they should be designed as moral avatars of their users to enhance user autonomy in a substantial sense.
一种普遍的观点认为,由于人口结构变化导致护理人员短缺,人工系统在应对这一问题上可以发挥重要作用。有一种观点认为,这也符合需要护理的人的利益,即人工系统可能会显著增强用户的自主性,因为他们可能会在家中停留更长时间。这一观点的前提是,所讨论的人工系统不需要人类护理人员的永久监督和控制。因此,它们需要具备一定程度的道德决策和行为能力,以应对道德相关的情况(人工道德)。机器伦理为人工道德提供了理论和伦理框架。本文审视了增强用户自主性的人工道德主体可能是什么样的问题。它特别讨论了这样一种建议,即应将它们设计为用户的道德化身,以在实质意义上增强用户自主性。