• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在牛津单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)中,胫骨组件的尺寸选择不当会增加假体周围骨折的风险。

Undersizing of the tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures.

机构信息

Endogap Joint Replacement Institute, Auenstraße 7, 82467, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.

Department Trauma Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, Prof. Küntscher Str. 8, 82418, Murnau, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1353-1359. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05142-z. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-023-05142-z
PMID:38214714
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Tibial periprosthetic fractures (TPF) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are a rare condition that affects about 1% of cases. Known risk factors include age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and bone density, as well as surgical technique and prosthesis design. The purpose of the study was to determine if undersizing of the tibial component in relation to the femoral component increases the risk of tibial periprosthetic fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Over a 6-year-period 1542 patients with cemented (n = 363) and uncemented (n = 1179) medial UKA were retrospectively evaluated. Tibial periprosthetic fractures were identified and classified, and epidemiologic data were documented at follow-up. Undersizing was defined as a smaller tibial component compared to the femoral implant. The association of potential risk factors for TPF with the incidence of TPF was investigated with binominal logistic regression.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (0.9%) suffered from TPF at a median of 1 month after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 5.9 ± 1.7 years. Fractures were more common in cases with undersized tibial components [odds ratio (OR) 3.2, p < 0.05]. Furthermore, older age (OR 1.1, p < 0.05) and female sex (OR 6.5, p < 0.05) were identified as significant risk factors, while BMI (p = 0.8) and cemented implantation (p = 0.2) had no effect on fracture rate. Revision surgery included open reduction and internal fixation or conversion to total knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Undersizing of implant sizes in UKA increases the risk for TPF especially in patients with small tibial implants. Therefore, mismatched implants should be avoided for UKA particularly when risk factors like obesity, older age, or female gender are present. Tibial periprosthetic fractures were successfully treated by open reduction and internal fixation or conversion to total knee arthroplasty.

摘要

引言

单髁膝关节置换术后胫骨假体周围骨折(TPF)是一种罕见的情况,约占病例的 1%。已知的危险因素包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和骨密度,以及手术技术和假体设计。本研究的目的是确定胫骨假体相对于股骨假体的尺寸过小是否会增加胫骨假体周围骨折的风险。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了 6 年内接受骨水泥固定(n=363)和非骨水泥固定(n=1179)内侧 UKA 的 1542 例患者。在随访时发现并分类了胫骨假体周围骨折,并记录了流行病学数据。胫骨假体尺寸过小定义为胫骨组件相对于股骨植入物较小。使用二项逻辑回归分析潜在危险因素与 TPF 发生率的关系。

结果

14 例患者(0.9%)在术后 1 个月中位数时发生 TPF。平均随访时间为 5.9±1.7 年。胫骨假体尺寸过小的病例中骨折更为常见[比值比(OR)3.2,p<0.05]。此外,年龄较大(OR 1.1,p<0.05)和女性(OR 6.5,p<0.05)被确定为显著危险因素,而 BMI(p=0.8)和骨水泥固定(p=0.2)对骨折率没有影响。翻修手术包括切开复位内固定或转换为全膝关节置换术。

结论

UKA 中假体尺寸过小会增加 TPF 的风险,特别是在胫骨假体较小的患者中。因此,特别是在肥胖、年龄较大或女性等危险因素存在的情况下,应避免使用不匹配的假体进行 UKA。胫骨假体周围骨折通过切开复位内固定或转换为全膝关节置换术成功治疗。

相似文献

1
Undersizing of the tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures.在牛津单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)中,胫骨组件的尺寸选择不当会增加假体周围骨折的风险。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1353-1359. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05142-z. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
2
Comparable incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非骨水泥固定与骨水泥固定单髁膝关节置换术后假体周围胫骨骨折发生率的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Mar;30(3):852-874. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06449-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
3
[Diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic fracture after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].[内侧单髁膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折的诊断与治疗]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 1;60(6):635-640. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20211111-00527.
4
Did a New Design of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Prosthesis Result in Improved Survival? A Study From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 2012-2021.牛津单髁膝关节假体的新设计是否提高了生存率?一项来自挪威关节置换登记处 2012-2021 年的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Sep 1;481(9):1703-1712. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002671. Epub 2023 May 30.
5
A Comparison of the Periprosthetic Fracture Rate of Cemented and Cementless Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.水泥固定与非水泥固定活动平台单髁膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折发生率的比较:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节注册处的数据分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8):2007-2013. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
6
Periprosthetic fractures after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a narrative review.内侧单髁膝关节置换术后的假体周围骨折:一篇叙述性综述。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug;142(8):2039-2048. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04063-z. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
7
Periprosthetic tibial fractures in total knee arthroplasty - an outcome analysis of a challenging and underreported surgical issue.全膝关节置换术中的假体周围胫骨骨折——一项关于具有挑战性且报道不足的外科问题的结果分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Sep 11;19(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2250-0.
8
Bearing thickness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a reliable predictor of tibial bone loss during revision to total knee arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术中的衬垫厚度是翻修为全膝关节置换术中胫骨骨丢失的可靠预测指标。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May;106(3):429-434. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.12.018. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
9
Periprosthetic tibial fracture as a complication of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current insights.全膝关节置换术后胫骨假体周围骨折:当前的认识。
Injury. 2024 Aug;55(8):111654. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111654. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
10
Short distance from the keel to the posterior tibial cortex is associated with fracture after cementless Oxford UKA in Asian patients.在亚洲患者中,距骨嵴至胫骨后皮质的距离较短与非骨水泥型牛津单髁置换术后骨折相关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Apr;30(4):1220-1230. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06553-4. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the Influence of Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Keel on Sagittal Plane Stresses: A Finite Element Analysis.探讨牛津单髁膝关节置换术龙骨对矢状面应力的影响:有限元分析
Cureus. 2025 Jun 21;17(6):e86506. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86506. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Fractures in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty are associated with a decreased medial keel-cortex distance of the tibial implant.牛津单髁膝关节置换术中的骨折与胫骨假体内侧嵴-皮质骨距离减小有关。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2024 Nov 22;36(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s43019-024-00237-2.

本文引用的文献

1
The relationship of distal femur and proximal tibia morphology with anterior cruciate ligament injuries.股骨远端和胫骨近端形态与前交叉韧带损伤的关系。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2023 Apr;45(4):495-501. doi: 10.1007/s00276-023-03097-9. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
Periprosthetic Tibial Plateau Fractures After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Are Successfully Treated With Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.单间膝关节置换术后假体周围胫骨平台骨折采用切开复位内固定治疗取得成功。
Orthopedics. 2022 Sep-Oct;45(5):287-292. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20220425-04. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
Cemented Versus Noncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes.
骨水泥固定与非骨水泥固定全膝关节置换术的结果。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Mar 15;30(6):273-280. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00353.
4
An Early Periprosthetic Fracture of a Cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Risk Factors and Mitigation Strategies.非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术后早期假体周围骨折:危险因素及预防策略
J Orthop Case Rep. 2021 Apr;11(4):65-69. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i04.2156.
5
Short distance from the keel to the posterior tibial cortex is associated with fracture after cementless Oxford UKA in Asian patients.在亚洲患者中,距骨嵴至胫骨后皮质的距离较短与非骨水泥型牛津单髁置换术后骨折相关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Apr;30(4):1220-1230. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06553-4. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
Comparable incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非骨水泥固定与骨水泥固定单髁膝关节置换术后假体周围胫骨骨折发生率的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Mar;30(3):852-874. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06449-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
Tibial shape and size predicts the risk of tibial plateau fracture after cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in Japanese patients.胫骨形态和大小预测日本患者非骨水泥单髁膝关节置换术后胫骨平台骨折的风险。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul;102-B(7):861-867. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1754.R1.
8
The Medial Eminence Line for Predicting Tibial Fracture Risk after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.内侧嵴线预测单髁膝关节置换术后胫骨骨折风险
Clin Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(2):166-170. doi: 10.4055/cios19011. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
9
What Is the Critical Tibial Resection Depth During Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Biomechanical Study of Fracture Risk.单髁膝关节置换术中胫骨截骨的临界深度是多少?一项骨折风险的生物力学研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Aug;35(8):2244-2248. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
10
New surgical instrumentation reduces the revision rate of unicompartmental knee replacement: A propensity score matched comparison of 15,906 knees from the National Joint Registry.新型手术器械降低单间室膝关节置换的翻修率:一项对国家关节注册中心15906例膝关节进行倾向评分匹配的比较研究。
Knee. 2020 Jun;27(3):993-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 27.