• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绘制心血管代谢患者体验和自我护理行为图谱,为数字医疗解决方案的设计、实施及持续使用提供信息:混合方法研究

Mapping the Cardiometabolic Patient Experience and Self-Care Behaviors to Inform Design, Implementation, and Persistent Use of Digital Health Care Solutions: Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Liska Jan, Mical Marie, Maillard Christophe, Dessapt Cécile, Bendig Europa, Mai Daniel, Piette John D, De Geest Sabina, Fontaine Guillaume

机构信息

Sanofi, Paris, France.

STURM und DRANG, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 12;8:e43683. doi: 10.2196/43683.

DOI:10.2196/43683
PMID:38214969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10818241/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiometabolic conditions including acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) require comprehensive care and patient engagement in self-care behaviors, and the drivers of those behaviors at the individual and health system level are still poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to gain insights into self-care behaviors of individuals with cardiometabolic conditions.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 98 adult patients with ACS and T2D was recruited in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan to participate in a mixed methods study using ethnographic methods. All participants completed 7-day web-based diaries tracking their level of engagement, and 48 completed 90-minute web-based semistructured interviews between February 4, 2021, and March 27, 2021, focusing on themes including moments of engagement. Qualitative analysis identified factors influencing self-care practices and a Patient Mind States Model prototype.

RESULTS

Patient reports indicate that many patients feel social pressure to adhere to treatment. Patients' experience can be understood within 5 categories defined in terms of their degree of engagement and adherence ("ignoring," "struggling," "juggling," "controlling," and "reframing").

CONCLUSIONS

For people living with ACS and T2D, the self-care journey is defined by patterns of patient experiences, which can identify areas that tailored digital health care interventions may play a meaningful role.

摘要

背景

包括急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和2型糖尿病(T2D)在内的心脏代谢疾病需要全面护理以及患者参与自我护理行为,而在个体和卫生系统层面,这些行为的驱动因素仍未得到充分理解。

目的

我们旨在深入了解患有心脏代谢疾病个体的自我护理行为。

方法

在美国、德国和台湾招募了98名患有ACS和T2D的成年患者作为便利样本,参与一项使用人种志方法的混合方法研究。所有参与者完成了为期7天的基于网络的日记,记录他们的参与程度,48人在2021年2月4日至2021年3月27日期间完成了90分钟的基于网络的半结构化访谈,重点关注包括参与时刻在内的主题。定性分析确定了影响自我护理实践的因素以及患者心理状态模型原型。

结果

患者报告表明,许多患者在坚持治疗方面感到社会压力。患者的经历可以根据他们的参与程度和坚持程度分为5类来理解(“忽视”“挣扎”“兼顾”“控制”和“重塑”)。

结论

对于患有ACS和T2D的人来说,自我护理过程由患者经历模式定义,这可以确定定制数字医疗干预可能发挥有意义作用的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10fa/10818241/2f298ecd6791/formative_v8i1e43683_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10fa/10818241/fcaab9a97531/formative_v8i1e43683_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10fa/10818241/753189be59c0/formative_v8i1e43683_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10fa/10818241/2f298ecd6791/formative_v8i1e43683_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10fa/10818241/fcaab9a97531/formative_v8i1e43683_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10fa/10818241/753189be59c0/formative_v8i1e43683_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10fa/10818241/2f298ecd6791/formative_v8i1e43683_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Mapping the Cardiometabolic Patient Experience and Self-Care Behaviors to Inform Design, Implementation, and Persistent Use of Digital Health Care Solutions: Mixed Methods Study.绘制心血管代谢患者体验和自我护理行为图谱,为数字医疗解决方案的设计、实施及持续使用提供信息:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 12;8:e43683. doi: 10.2196/43683.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
Understanding Whether and How a Digital Health Intervention Improves Transition Care for Emerging Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation.了解数字健康干预措施是否以及如何改善1型糖尿病青少年成人的过渡护理:一项混合方法的现实主义评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 13;12:e46115. doi: 10.2196/46115.
4
Opening the Black Box of an mHealth Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for Diabetes Self-Management: Interview Study Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.打开用于糖尿病自我管理的移动健康患者报告结局工具的黑匣子:2型糖尿病患者访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 19;7:e47811. doi: 10.2196/47811.
5
A service-user digital intervention to collect real-time safety information on acute, adult mental health wards: the WardSonar mixed-methods study.服务用户数字干预措施,以实时收集急性成人精神科病房的安全信息:WardSonar 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(14):1-182. doi: 10.3310/UDBQ8402.
6
Digital Health Interventions for People With Type 2 Diabetes to Develop Self-Care Expertise, Adapt to Identity Changes, and Influence Other's Perception: Qualitative Study.数字健康干预措施对 2 型糖尿病患者自我护理专业技能的影响、适应身份变化以及影响他人感知的定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 21;22(12):e21328. doi: 10.2196/21328.
7
Participants' and Health Care Providers' Insights Regarding a Web-Based and Mobile-Delivered Healthy Eating Program for Disadvantaged People With Type 2 Diabetes: Descriptive Qualitative Study.参与者及医疗保健提供者对一项针对弱势2型糖尿病患者的基于网络和移动设备的健康饮食计划的见解:描述性定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jan 4;7:e37429. doi: 10.2196/37429.
8
Brief Digital Solutions in Behavior Change Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Literature Review.2型糖尿病行为改变干预中的简短数字解决方案:文献综述
Diabetes Ther. 2022 Apr;13(4):635-649. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01244-w. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
9
Meaning in Measurement: Evaluating Young Autistic Adults' Active Engagement and Expressed Interest in Quality-of-Life Goals.测量中的意义:评估年轻自闭症成年人对生活质量目标的积极参与度和表达出的兴趣。
Autism Adulthood. 2020 Sep 1;2(3):227-242. doi: 10.1089/aut.2019.0081. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
10
The role of economic, educational and social resources in supporting the use of digital health technologies by people with T2D: a qualitative study.经济、教育和社会资源在支持2型糖尿病患者使用数字健康技术方面的作用:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 5;21(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10325-7.

引用本文的文献

1
European Survey on Adults with Type 1 Diabetes and their Caregivers: Insights into Personal Experience and Needs for Improving Diabetes Care.欧洲1型糖尿病成人患者及其照顾者调查:对个人经历及改善糖尿病护理需求的洞察
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Mar;16(3):471-484. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01685-5. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
2
Behavioral Engagement and Activation Model Study (BEAMS): A latent class analysis of adopters and non-adopters of digital health technologies among people with Type 2 diabetes.行为参与和激活模型研究(BEAMS):2 型糖尿病患者中数字健康技术采用者和非采用者的潜在类别分析。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jul 27;14(8):491-498. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae034.

本文引用的文献

1
Laypeople's Online Health Information Search Strategies and Use for Health-Related Problems: Cross-sectional Survey.民众在线健康信息搜索策略及其在健康相关问题中的应用:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 2;24(9):e29609. doi: 10.2196/29609.
2
Self-care: A concept analysis.自我护理:一项概念分析。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2021 Sep 5;8(4):418-425. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.08.007. eCollection 2021 Oct 10.
3
Adapting interventions to new contexts-the ADAPT guidance.适应新环境的干预措施——ADAPT 指南。
BMJ. 2021 Aug 3;374:n1679. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1679.
4
Adherence to beta-blockers and long-term risk of heart failure and mortality after a myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后β受体阻滞剂的依从性与心力衰竭和死亡的长期风险
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Feb;8(1):344-355. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13079. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.健康与糖尿病的社会决定因素:一项科学综述。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov 2;44(1):258-79. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0053.
6
Management of chronic cardiometabolic conditions and mental health during COVID-19.2019冠状病毒病期间慢性心脏代谢疾病和心理健康的管理
Prim Care Diabetes. 2021 Feb;15(1):21-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2020.08.016. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
7
The SPUR Model: A Framework for Considering Patient Behavior.SPUR模型:一种考量患者行为的框架。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Jan 16;14:97-105. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S237778. eCollection 2020.
8
Diabetes digital app technology: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group.糖尿病数字 APP 技术:效益、挑战和建议。欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)和美国糖尿病协会(ADA)糖尿病技术工作组的共识报告。
Diabetologia. 2020 Feb;63(2):229-241. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05034-1.
9
Behaviour change in diabetes: behavioural science advancements to support the use of theory.糖尿病行为改变:支持理论应用的行为科学进展。
Diabet Med. 2020 Mar;37(3):455-463. doi: 10.1111/dme.14198. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
Lifestyle factors, self-management and patient empowerment in diabetes care.生活方式因素、自我管理和患者赋权在糖尿病护理中的作用。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Dec;26(2_suppl):55-63. doi: 10.1177/2047487319885455.