University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Urol Pract. 2024 Mar;11(2):385-393. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000502. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
Iatrogenic injury during urethral catheterization is a common reason for inpatient urologic consultation and is associated with increased morbidity and resource utilization. Literature defining the patient population, interventions, or outcomes associated with traumatic catheterization is scarce.
We performed a retrospective review of consults for adult urethral catheterization at a single tertiary care center (July 2017-December 2019), with focus on patient characteristics and complications. Traumatic urethral catheterization was defined as catheterization by the primary team with at least 1 of these conditions: gross hematuria, meatal blood, or cystoscopic evidence of urethral trauma. Characteristics collected included urologic history, catheterization circumstances, procedural intervention, and subsequent visits.
Three hundred urology consults for urethral catheterization were identified, including 98 (33%) traumatic events (5.3 incidents/1000 catheters placed). All traumatic catheterization consults were in men (median age 69 years). Most (71%) patients sustaining injury had significant urologic history (eg, benign prostatic hyperplasia, urethral stricture). Sixty-three (64%) consults were determined to be uncomplicated (not requiring any procedural intervention for catheter placement). Gross hematuria was the most common sequela (50% of patients). The 30-day catheter-associated urinary tract infection rate was 13%, and 2 patients developed sepsis. Complications required a total of 52 additional hospital admission days, 19 of which were intensive-care level, as well 113 outpatient urology visits.
Traumatic urethral catheterization is associated with increased need for procedural intervention, risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and additional resource utilization. Further studies on traumatic catheterization are needed to guide systemic efforts for minimizing injury and cost.
在尿道置管过程中发生的医源性损伤是住院泌尿科会诊的常见原因,与发病率和资源利用增加有关。定义与创伤性导尿相关的患者人群、干预措施或结局的文献很少。
我们对一家三级保健中心的成人尿道置管会诊(2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 12 月)进行了回顾性研究,重点是患者特征和并发症。创伤性尿道置管被定义为初级团队进行的导尿,至少有以下一种情况:肉眼血尿、尿道口出血或膀胱镜下尿道损伤的证据。收集的特征包括泌尿科病史、置管情况、程序干预和后续就诊。
确定了 300 例泌尿科尿道置管会诊,其中 98 例(33%)为创伤性事件(5.3 例/1000 例置管)。所有创伤性导尿会诊均为男性(中位年龄 69 岁)。大多数(71%)受伤的患者都有明显的泌尿科病史(如良性前列腺增生、尿道狭窄)。63 例(64%)会诊被认为不复杂(无需任何程序干预即可放置导管)。肉眼血尿是最常见的后遗症(50%的患者)。30 天导管相关尿路感染率为 13%,2 例患者发生败血症。并发症共需要额外的 52 个住院日,其中 19 个是重症监护级别的,还有 113 次门诊泌尿科就诊。
创伤性尿道置管与需要更多程序干预、导管相关尿路感染的风险以及额外的资源利用有关。需要进一步研究创伤性导尿,以指导系统努力,尽量减少损伤和成本。