Suppr超能文献

改善 Foley 导尿的效果:一项回顾性研究及拟议方案

Improving outcomes in foley catheterization: A retrospective review with a proposed protocol.

作者信息

Sarver Jordan, Farley Remington, Daugherty Shane, Bilbrew Jordan, Palka Joshua

机构信息

Department of Urology, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, United States.

出版信息

World J Nephrol. 2025 Jun 25;14(2):104207. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i2.104207.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urologists are commonly consulted regarding difficult and traumatic urethral catheterizations. Complications surrounding Foley catheterizations represent a significant burden to the healthcare system.

AIM

To assess the demographic and patient characteristics surrounding urological consultation for difficult and traumatic Foley catheterizations at our institution across multiple hospitals.

METHODS

This is a single-institution, multi-hospital, 263 patient, retrospective chart review from Jan 2020-December 2023.

RESULTS

The majority of consultations (80.2%) did not require heroic measures by the urology service. A Foley catheter placement was determined not difficult in the majority 191 (72.6%) of patients. Sub-group analysis of "difficult by urology" "not difficult by urology", showed a significant difference between those with zero attempts, one attempt, and greater than one attempts ( = 0.004). Those patients specifically with greater than one attempts were more likely to be seen as a difficult insertion by urology assessment (60.6%) compared to not difficult (38.6%). Likewise, those patients with a history of difficult urethral catheter (DUC)/traumatic urethral catheterization (TUC) (25.8%) were more likely to be difficult compared to those without a history of DUC/TUC (14.2%) ( = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

The study found that majority of consultations received did not require heroic measures by the urology service to place a catheter. Patients who had a history of DUC/TUC and those who had greater than one catheter attempts were statistically more likely to be a DUC based on urology assessment. At our institution we hope to propose a protocol in which nursing staff and non-urologic clinicians will utilize a troubleshooting checklist and an algorithm when difficult or traumatic urethral catheters are encountered in order to improve patient care and decrease healthcare costs. For example, this protocol would ideally address complications of multiple catheter attempts such as urethral trauma, development of urethral strictures, and infection risk. Additionally, future trainings and availability of additional resources will be provided and assessed with a goal of reducing healthcare cost surrounding these complications.

摘要

背景

泌尿科医生经常会就困难和创伤性尿道插管问题进行会诊。Foley导尿管插管相关并发症给医疗系统带来了沉重负担。

目的

评估我们机构多家医院因困难和创伤性Foley导尿管插管而进行泌尿科会诊的人口统计学和患者特征。

方法

这是一项单机构、多医院、纳入263例患者的回顾性病历审查,时间跨度为2020年1月至2023年12月。

结果

大多数会诊(80.2%)不需要泌尿科采取特别措施。在大多数患者(191例,72.6%)中,确定Foley导尿管置入并不困难。对“泌尿科认为困难”和“泌尿科认为不困难”进行亚组分析,结果显示零次尝试、一次尝试和多次尝试的患者之间存在显著差异(P = 0.004)。与不困难的患者(38.6%)相比,那些多次尝试的患者经泌尿科评估更有可能被视为插管困难(60.6%)。同样,有困难尿道插管(DUC)/创伤性尿道插管(TUC)病史的患者(25.8%)比没有DUC/TUC病史的患者(14.2%)更有可能遇到困难(P = 0.038)。

结论

该研究发现,大多数接受会诊的患者不需要泌尿科采取特别措施来放置导尿管。根据泌尿科评估,有DUC/TUC病史的患者以及导尿管尝试次数超过一次的患者在统计学上更有可能出现困难插管情况。在我们机构,我们希望提出一项方案,即当遇到困难或创伤性尿道插管时,护理人员和非泌尿科临床医生将使用故障排除清单和算法,以改善患者护理并降低医疗成本。例如,该方案理想情况下将解决多次导尿管尝试的并发症,如尿道创伤、尿道狭窄的形成以及感染风险。此外,未来将提供并评估额外的培训和资源,目标是降低围绕这些并发症的医疗成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca82/12001225/4510e0eee670/104207-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验