• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

毒理学的可能未来——概率风险评估。

The probable future of toxicology - probabilistic risk assessment.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health and Whiting School of Engineering, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Doerenkamp-Zbinden Chair for Evidence-based Toxicology, Baltimore, MD, USA.

L'Oréal, Research & Innovation, Clichy, France.

出版信息

ALTEX. 2024;41(2):273-281. doi: 10.14573/altex.2310301. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

DOI:10.14573/altex.2310301
PMID:38215352
Abstract

Both because of the shortcomings of existing risk assessment methodologies, as well as newly available tools to predict hazard and risk with machine learning approaches, there has been an emerging emphasis on probabilistic risk assessment. Increasingly sophisticated AI models can be applied to a plethora of exposure and hazard data to obtain not only predictions for particular endpoints but also to estimate the uncertainty of the risk assessment outcome. This provides the basis for a shift from deterministic to more probabilistic approaches but comes at the cost of an increased complexity of the process as it requires more resources and human expertise. There are still challenges to overcome before a probabilistic paradigm is fully embraced by regulators. Based on an earlier white paper (Maertens et al., 2022), a workshop discussed the prospects, challenges and path forward for implementing such AI-based probabilistic hazard assessment. Moving forward, we will see the transition from categorized into probabilistic and dose-dependent hazard outcomes, the application of internal thresholds of toxicological concern for data-poor substances, the acknowledgement of user-friendly open-source software, a rise in the expertise of toxicologists required to understand and interpret artificial intelligence models, and the honest communication of uncertainty in risk assessment to the public.

摘要

由于现有风险评估方法的局限性,以及新的机器学习方法来预测危害和风险的工具,概率风险评估越来越受到重视。越来越复杂的人工智能模型可以应用于大量的暴露和危害数据,不仅可以预测特定终点,还可以估计风险评估结果的不确定性。这为从确定性方法向更概率性方法转变提供了基础,但也增加了过程的复杂性,因为它需要更多的资源和人力专业知识。在监管机构完全接受概率范式之前,仍有一些挑战需要克服。基于之前的白皮书(Maertens 等人,2022 年),一个研讨会讨论了实施这种基于人工智能的概率危害评估的前景、挑战和前进道路。展望未来,我们将看到从分类到概率和剂量依赖性危害结果的转变,对数据匮乏物质应用毒理学关注的内部阈值,承认用户友好的开源软件,毒理学家需要提高理解和解释人工智能模型的专业知识,以及向公众诚实地沟通风险评估中的不确定性。

相似文献

1
The probable future of toxicology - probabilistic risk assessment.毒理学的可能未来——概率风险评估。
ALTEX. 2024;41(2):273-281. doi: 10.14573/altex.2310301. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
2
ToxAIcology - The evolving role of artificial intelligence in advancing toxicology and modernizing regulatory science.毒理学人工智能 - 人工智能在推进毒理学和使监管科学现代化方面的不断发展的作用。
ALTEX. 2023;40(4):559-570. doi: 10.14573/altex.2309191.
3
Probabilistic risk assessment - the keystone for the future of toxicology.概率风险评估——毒理学的未来基石。
ALTEX. 2022;39(1):3-29. doi: 10.14573/altex.2201081.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Artificial intelligence (AI)-it's the end of the tox as we know it (and I feel fine).人工智能(AI)——这是我们所知道的毒理学的终结(我感觉很好)。
Arch Toxicol. 2024 Mar;98(3):735-754. doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03666-2. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
6
Application of probabilistic methods to address variability and uncertainty in estimating risks for non-cancer health effects.应用概率方法解决估计非癌症健康影响风险时的变异性和不确定性。
Environ Health. 2023 Jan 12;21(Suppl 1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00918-z.
7
Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.用于评估基因组损伤的下一代检测策略:一个概念框架及考量因素
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017 Jun;58(5):264-283. doi: 10.1002/em.22045. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
Report of the First ONTOX Stakeholder Network Meeting: Digging Under the Surface of ONTOX Together With the Stakeholders.第一届 ONTOX 利益相关者网络会议报告:与利益相关者一起深入探讨 ONTOX。
Altern Lab Anim. 2024 Mar;52(2):117-131. doi: 10.1177/02611929231225730. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
9
New approach methodologies in human regulatory toxicology - Not if, but how and when!人类监管毒理学中的新方法学——不是如果,而是如何以及何时!
Environ Int. 2023 Aug;178:108082. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108082. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
10
A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose-Response Assessment of Human Health Effects.一种用于人类健康效应剂量反应评估的统一概率框架。
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Dec;123(12):1241-54. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409385. Epub 2015 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cumulative risk assessment as the pathway to public health protection for behavioral neurotoxicity.累积风险评估作为行为神经毒性公共卫生防护的途径。
Neurotoxicology. 2025 May;108:400-411. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2025.04.015. Epub 2025 May 10.
2
Editorial: Leveraging artificial intelligence and open science for toxicological risk assessment.社论:利用人工智能和开放科学进行毒理学风险评估
Front Toxicol. 2025 Feb 12;7:1568453. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1568453. eCollection 2025.
3
Editorial: Five grand challenges in toxicology.社论:毒理学的五大重大挑战
Front Toxicol. 2025 Jan 21;6:1533238. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1533238. eCollection 2024.
4
A twin transition in regulatory toxicology: moving toward Chemicals 2.0 and phasing out animal testing.监管毒理学的双重转变:迈向化学品2.0并逐步淘汰动物试验。
Toxicol Sci. 2025 Feb 1;203(2):160-165. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae130.
5
Reducing uncertainty in dose-response assessments by incorporating Bayesian benchmark dose modeling and in vitro data on population variability.通过纳入贝叶斯基准剂量模型和关于群体变异性的体外数据来降低剂量反应评估中的不确定性。
Risk Anal. 2025 Feb;45(2):457-472. doi: 10.1111/risa.17451. Epub 2024 Aug 16.