Li Ru-Zhong, Liu Yu-Hao, Huang Yan-Huan, Wu Hong-Fei
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China.
Anhui Wenchuan Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., Tongling 244002, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Jan 8;45(1):407-416. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202301058.
To investigate the impact of pyrite mining on the heavy metal pollution in the surrounding soil in Tongling City, 50 surface soil and sediment samples were collected from mining fields, farmland, forests, villages, and the river. The contents of Zn, Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni, Cd, and As in soils and sediments were analyzed. Then, the spatial distribution characteristics of heavy metals in soil were analyzed, and the degree of heavy metal pollution and potential ecological risk level were assessed. Finally, the sources of soil heavy metal pollution were identified. In general, the soil in the study area was weakly acidic (average pH=6.32), and the contents of other heavy metals except Ni exceeded the background values of the soil in Tongling City. Moreover, Ni and Cd were enriched in the river sediments. According to the Nemerow pollution index, Pb and As reached heavy pollution levels, Cu and Cd reached moderate pollution levels, and other elements belonged to light or non-pollution levels. The comprehensive pollution index of different land types was ranked in the order of mining field > river > forest > farmland > village. Mining fields and the river were heavily polluted, forest land was moderately polluted, and farmland and villages were mainly mildly polluted. Pb, As, and Cd belonged to the medium ecological risk category. The contribution rates of the potential ecological risk index were 33.27%, 27.39%, and 20.22%, which were much higher than the other four elements. The ranking results of the potential ecological risk index of different land types was the same as that of the comprehensive pollution index. Mining fields and the river were at a high-risk level, forest land reached moderate risk, and the rest were at a slight risk level. The consistent results of correlation analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and positive definite matrix factor analysis (PMF) indicated that Zn, Cu, Pb, Cd, and As were mainly derived from pyrite mining activities, Cr mainly came from the parent material and agricultural production, and Ni was mainly affected by soil-forming parent material and pyrite mining activities.
为研究铜陵市硫铁矿开采对周边土壤重金属污染的影响,采集了50份来自矿区、农田、森林、村庄及河流的表层土壤和沉积物样本。分析了土壤和沉积物中锌、铬、铜、铅、镍、镉和砷的含量。然后,分析了土壤中重金属的空间分布特征,并评估了重金属污染程度和潜在生态风险水平。最后,确定了土壤重金属污染的来源。总体而言,研究区土壤呈弱酸性(平均pH = 6.32),除镍外,其他重金属含量均超过铜陵市土壤背景值。此外,镍和镉在河流沉积物中富集。根据内梅罗污染指数,铅和砷达到重度污染水平,铜和镉达到中度污染水平,其他元素属于轻度或无污染水平。不同土地类型的综合污染指数排序为:矿区>河流>森林>农田>村庄。矿区和河流污染严重,林地中度污染,农田和村庄主要轻度污染。铅、砷和镉属于中等生态风险类别。潜在生态风险指数贡献率分别为33.27%、27.39%和20.22%,远高于其他四种元素。不同土地类型潜在生态风险指数排序结果与综合污染指数排序相同。矿区和河流处于高风险水平,林地达到中等风险,其余处于低风险水平。相关性分析、主成分分析(PCA)和正定矩阵因子分析(PMF)结果一致表明,锌、铜、铅、镉和砷主要来源于硫铁矿开采活动,铬主要来自成土母质和农业生产,镍主要受成土母质和硫铁矿开采活动影响。