Muysewinkel Emilie, Stene Lise Eilin, Van Deynse Helena, Vesentini Lara, Bilsen Johan, Van Overmeire Roel
Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Gullhaugveien 1, 0484 Oslo, Norway.
J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Mar;102:102829. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102829. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
Post-traumatic stress (PTS) was extensively investigated during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, numerous researchers have raised concerns regarding the adherence of many of these studies to the diagnostic criteria for PTSD as outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). This review aimed to provide insight into the methodology of research on PTS during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Two independent reviewers examined a total of 1129 studies published between 1/01/2020 and 1/07/2023. The investigation focused on the scales employed to assess PTS, the diagnostic framework used (DSM or ICD), whether there was referral to an index-event in the PTS measurement and country where data collection took place.
Among the 1129 studies, 70.0% did not provide any indication of an index-event to which PTS symptoms were attributed. Only 11.3% of the studies explicitly indicated an index-event associated with the PTS symptoms. Furthermore, 54.1% of the studies utilized scales based on DSM-IV criteria. Finally, the majority of PTS-studies had data collections in China, United States and Italy.
A limited number of studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic reported use of an index-event in their PTS measurement. Furthermore, most studies used scales based on a previous iteration of the most used diagnostical system, namely the DSM. This delay in the implementation of new diagnostic criteria, may impair the clinical relevance of scientific studies.
在新冠疫情期间,创伤后应激反应(PTS)得到了广泛研究。然而,众多研究人员对其中许多研究是否符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)或《国际疾病分类》(ICD)中概述的创伤后应激障碍诊断标准表示担忧。本综述旨在深入了解新冠疫情期间PTS的研究方法。
两名独立评审员共审查了2020年1月1日至2023年7月1日期间发表的1129项研究。调查重点在于用于评估PTS的量表、所使用的诊断框架(DSM或ICD)、在PTS测量中是否提及索引事件以及数据收集所在的国家。
在1129项研究中,70.0%未提供任何关于PTS症状所归因的索引事件的指示。只有11.3%的研究明确指出了与PTS症状相关的索引事件。此外,54.1%的研究使用了基于DSM-IV标准的量表。最后,大多数PTS研究的数据收集在中国、美国和意大利进行。
在新冠疫情期间进行的研究中,报告在其PTS测量中使用索引事件的研究数量有限。此外,大多数研究使用的量表基于最常用诊断系统的先前版本,即DSM。新诊断标准实施的这种延迟可能会损害科学研究的临床相关性。