Comtesse Hannah, Smid Geert E, Rummel Anna-Maria, Spreeuwenberg Peter, Lundorff Marie, Dückers Michel L A
Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Eichstaett, Germany.
ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, Diemen, Netherlands; University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2024 Apr 1;350:359-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.094. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) is now included as a diagnosis in international classification systems. Most research on PGD is based on Western populations, but first data from non-Western countries have recently become available. Little is still known about country-related effects on PGD's prevalence.
Determining possible causes of variations in the prevalence of PGD as defined by DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 within and between countries.
We retrieved data from 24 prevalence studies, the World Bank and the 2022 World Risk Report. Negative binomial regressions were used to explore methodological, loss-related and country context characteristics as predictors of PGD. The average rate of PGD was calculated using random effects models.
The included studies comprised 34 samples from 16 countries (20,347 participants). Non-probability sampling and older mean age of the sample as well as lower country vulnerability were associated with higher PGD rates. The average PGD prevalence was 13 % (95 % CI [11, 22]), varying from 5 % (95 % CI [3, 11]) in probability to 16 % (95 % CI [13, 25]) in non-probability samples.
Samples from Europe and North America were overrepresented. For about half of the countries, data were available from only one sample.
While confirming the importance of studies' methodological quality, the results show that PGD is of public health relevance around the world, but especially common in less vulnerabled countries with better access to daily necessities and healthcare services, highlighting sociocultural impacts on grief processing. Further investigations of cross-national differences are needed.
持续性悲伤障碍(PGD)现已被纳入国际分类系统的诊断范畴。大多数关于PGD的研究基于西方人群,但最近来自非西方国家的首批数据已可得。关于国家相关因素对PGD患病率的影响仍知之甚少。
确定各国国内及之间由《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版修订版(DSM-5-TR)和《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD-11)定义的PGD患病率差异的可能原因。
我们检索了24项患病率研究、世界银行和《2022年世界风险报告》的数据。使用负二项回归来探索方法学、与损失相关的和国家背景特征作为PGD的预测因素。使用随机效应模型计算PGD的平均发生率。
纳入的研究包括来自16个国家的34个样本(20347名参与者)。非概率抽样、样本的平均年龄较大以及国家脆弱性较低与较高的PGD发生率相关。PGD的平均患病率为13%(95%置信区间[11, 22]),在概率样本中为5%(95%置信区间[3, 11]),在非概率样本中为16%(95%置信区间[13, 25])。
来自欧洲和北美的样本占比过高。对于约一半的国家,仅从一个样本中获取了数据。
在确认研究方法质量重要性的同时,结果表明PGD在全球具有公共卫生相关性,但在弱势群体较少、日常必需品和医疗服务获取更好的国家尤为常见,突出了社会文化对悲伤处理的影响。需要进一步调查跨国差异。