Yamana Ippei, Fujikawa Takahisa, Kawamura Yuichiro, Hasegawa Suguru
Surgery, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, JPN.
Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, JPN.
Cureus. 2023 Dec 13;15(12):e50443. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50443. eCollection 2023 Dec.
The benefits of gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer (GC) remain unknown. This study was conducted to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of elderly patients with GC (≥ 80 years) who underwent gastrectomy.
We enrolled 479 patients (Stages I-IV) who underwent gastrectomy with R0-1 resection. The patients were divided into an elderly group (E group; age ≥ 80 years) (n = 115) and a non-elderly group (NE group; age < 80 years) (n = 364). After propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, the short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the groups.
The rate of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ IIIa) in the two groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.657). Before PSM, the five-year overall survival (OS, 35.3% vs. 71.7%, p < 0.001) and disease-specific survival (DSS, 56.8% vs. 81.8%, p < 0.001) in the E group were significantly shorter than that in the NE group, respectively. On the other hand, significant differences between the E and NE groups were not shown in either the five-year OS (35.5% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.0985) or the five-year DSS (56.5% vs. 66.9%, p = 0.274) after PSM.
Gastrectomy for elderly patients with GC can be considered safe based on short-term outcomes. In terms of long-term results, elderly patients are not inferior to non-elderly patients if the patients' backgrounds are the same. On the other hand, the long-term outcomes of elderly GC patients who have various comorbidities are not satisfactory, so we should carefully consider the indications for gastrectomy.
胃癌(GC)老年患者行胃切除术的益处尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估接受胃切除术的老年GC患者(≥80岁)的短期和长期结局。
我们纳入了479例行R0-1切除胃切除术的患者(I-IV期)。患者分为老年组(E组;年龄≥80岁)(n = 115)和非老年组(NE组;年龄<80岁)(n = 364)。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,比较两组的短期和长期结局。
两组术后并发症发生率(Clavien-Dindo分类≥IIIa)无显著差异(p = 0.657)。PSM前,E组的五年总生存率(OS,35.3%对71.7%,p < 0.001)和疾病特异性生存率(DSS,56.8%对81.8%,p < 0.001)分别显著低于NE组。另一方面,PSM后,E组和NE组在五年OS(35.5%对50.8%,p = 0.0985)或五年DSS(56.5%对66.9%,p = 0.274)方面均未显示出显著差异。
基于短期结局,老年GC患者行胃切除术可被认为是安全的。就长期结果而言,如果患者背景相同,老年患者并不逊于非老年患者。另一方面,患有各种合并症的老年GC患者的长期结局并不理想,因此我们应仔细考虑胃切除术的适应证。